Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T18CM10091
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/14/2019 | PIMA COUNTY | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | BUILDING – COMMERCIAL Reviewer: Chris Anderson Please provide a completed Special Inspection Certificate – Building & Grading that can be found on the City of Tucson Planning & Development Services website under the link “All Application Forms & Submittal Requirements.” On sheet A2.1 the Laundry Discharge room 012 walls shall be 1-hour fire-rated per 2012 IBC 713.13.3. On sheet A4.1 the boxed structural column assemblies along grid lines D.3 and F shall be 1-hour fire-resistance rated per 2012 IBC Table 601. The box outs appear to be non-rated 2x4 construction per Wall Legend. Please show how required fire rating will be achieved. On bath elevations, sheets A5.5b, A5.7b, A5.8b, and A5.9b refer reader to location of toilet room accessories in the drawing set (sheet A9.3). Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. In the Door Schedule, sheet A8.1, door 028 shall be ¾-hour fire-rated as it is located in fire-rated walls. A boxed note on the Door and Window Schedules, sheets A8.1 and A8.2, refer the reader to Specifications for additional Code information. Please confirm that these Specifications include maximum U-factors and solar heat gain coefficients in accordance with the building envelope COMcheck on sheet M6.0. Please revise exterior wall details on sheet A8.3 to include the layer of fire-rated drywall between the exterior finish systems and sheathing. Please pay particular attention to showing how the drywall surfaces will be protected from moisture/water within the assembly. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.4. Revise note “Line of wall” on Toilet Accessories detail HD09, sheet A9.3, to “Line of controls wall”. Ref. ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009 fig, 607.4.1. In the structural calculations, page 8 – Code Search, revise Type of Construction to indicate 1-hour fire-ratings for roof and floor. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.4. Structural calculations show that 2nd floor steel beam 15 shall be a W24x68; however the framing plan, sheet S3.1, shows this beam as a W21x68. Please confirm the size. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. Structural calculations show that column E/12.1 shall be HS5x5x3/8; however the foundation plan shows this column as C1, HS5x5x1/4. Please confirm size. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. Structural calculations show that column base plate EP-2 is to be 1” thick; however detail 13/S2.2 shows this base plate as ¾” thick. Please confirm the size. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. Structural calculations do not appear to include calculations for the elevator pit foundation walls 8 & 9/S2.1. |
| 01/14/2019 | PIMA COUNTY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLUMBING – COMMERCIAL Reviewer: Chris Anderson Water calculations and Fixture Unit Calculations on sheet P001 are based on the 2015 IPC. The City of Tucson adopted Code for this project is the 2012 IPC. Revise calculations to reflect the adopted Code. Ref. 2012 IPC 106.3.1. On the Mechanical room Water Heating Piping Detail, sheet 1/P700 and in the Master Thermostatic Mixing Valve Schedule, sheet P001, the water temperature set point for hot water supply to fixtures is shown as 120-degrees F; however the 2012 IPC 607.1.2 limits tempered water to a maximum of 110-degrees F. Please explain. In the Plumbing Fixture Schedule, sheet P002, please provide a note that the public use lavatories shall have automatic faucets that deliver no more than 0.25 gallon per metering cycle. Ref. City of Tucson amendment to the 2012 IPC. The grease interceptor capacity will be reviewed by the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Industrial Wastewater Section as part of the RWRD review for sewer connection permit (in process). RWRD will contact the Applicant directly. |
| 01/14/2019 | PIMA COUNTY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ELECTRICAL – COMMERCIAL Reviewer: Charlie Bard On sheet E0.03 the Site Lighting Base Detail 1 showing construction of the concrete base is redundant. A structural detail for light pole bases is shown on structural sheet S6.1. Coordinate detail with Architect so that differing information is not given. On sheet E0.03 please include outdoor lighting lumen calculations in accordance with the 2012 City of Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code Table 401.1. Select a commercial lighting option for lighting area E3 and provide calculations in tabular form for allowable total lumens (fully shielded plus unshielded) and for the maximum allowable unshielded lumens portion of the total. The proposed total lumens and the proposed unshielded fixtures lumens shall match or be less than the allowable lumens. For each fixture indicate “fully shielded” or “unshielded”. Refer to the definitions for each in the OLC. The photometric site plan on sheet E0.03 does not provide the information required. Per the 2012 City of Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code 402.1 the maximum rated color temperature for outdoor light sources (lamps and fixtures) is 3500K. Please verify that the exterior fixtures shown in the Exterior Luminaire Schedule, sheet E2.00, are in compliance. In General Lighting Notes, sheet E2.00, please change item 2 to read “2012 International Energy Conservation Code” rather than “Arizona State Energy Code.” There is a note PENDING FINAL DESIGN referencing the Electrical Utility Schedule on sheet E3.01. As these documents have been submitted for a building permit and the design should be “final” please remove this note. Provide an Arizona registered electrical engineer’s stamp for all electrical sheets |
| 01/14/2019 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Section Manager PROJECT: 6555 S. Bay Colony Dr. T18CM10091 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 14, 2019 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The building plans have been reviewed for compliance with development package DP18-0298. As DP18-0298 does not provide required zoning information such as use, building height etc. Zoning cannot verify that the proposed building plans match what is proposed on the development package (DP). Until the required information is provide on the DP and the DP is approved Zoning cannot approve the building plan. 3. Until all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 01/14/2019 | PIMA COUNTY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | MECHANICAL – COMMERCIAL Reviewer: Chris Anderson Combustion Air Calculations, sheet M0.1, show that the laundry room requires a single permanent 48” x 30” combustion air louver within 12” of top of enclosure. Please show this opening on the 1st Floor Mechanical Plan, sheet M2.1 or enlarged plan, sheet M3.0. Ref. 2012 IMC 106.3.1. Provide heating and cooling load calculations summary sheets for each heating and cooling unit to justify the capacities shown in schedules, sheet M0.2. Per City of Tucson amendment to the 2012 IECC, Table R302.1, the load calculations and equipment selection shall be performed for summer design dry bulb temperature of 105-degrees F, summer design wet bulb temperature of 66-degrees F, and winter design dry bulb temperature of 32-degrees F. |
| 01/14/2019 | KROBLES1 | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | WATER – COMMERCIAL Reviewer: Chris Anderson Neither the Civil Utility Plan nor the Water Calculation on sheet P001 identify the required water meter size. Please provide this information in the water calculations. Ref. 2012 IPC 106.3.1 and City of Tucson Water Meter Sizing Guidelines. Water pipe sizing on sheet P001 is based on the 2015 IPC. The City of Tucson adopted Code for this project is the 2012 IPC. Revise calculations to reflect the adopted Code. Ref. 2012 IPC 106.3.1. |
| 01/28/2019 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/01/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T18CM10091 1) Coordinate with Development Package DP18-0298 to ensure that roof drains scupper underneath sidewalks. Reference City of Tucson Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 7-01.4.1.E 2) Sheet A0.2. Clear height to lowest Accessible Parking sign is 7'. Adjust as needed 3) Sheet A0.2. All accessible pathways comply with ICC A117.1. Provide detail on plans for all curb access ramps, including detectable warnings. Make sure details match those shown in development plan 4) Sheets A0.2, A0.3. Double check that all details shown, trash enclosure, sidewalk, bollards etc match those shown on the DP 5) Once the DP has been approved, any outstanding commercial review comments have been addressed and a new work flow opened Engineering can conduct an over the counter electronic review of the building plans. Call or Email to Schedule John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/05/2019 | AMARTIN1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |