Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW - COMMERCIAL
Permit Number - T18CM09898
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW - COMMERCIAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/07/2019 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/08/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the civil site plan showing the location of the water meter and backflow assembly. Show the size, route, anf material of the water service to the building. |
| 01/23/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T18CM09898 - New Shell Building - Related to DP16-0044 Shell Building Plan Review (1st Review) 1030 W. Irvington Road - PAD 29 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 23, 2019 DUE DATE: January 24, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the Shell Building plans for compliance with the approved development package. While the building footprint is somewhat consistent with the DP as it relates to the zoning review purview Building footprint, Height, square footage, site conditions etc., zoning cannot approve the building plans until the 3rd Party and PDSD Commercial Plans reviewers have approved the building plans. 2. COMMENT: Zoning reviewed the building site plan included in the building package for consistency with the approved DP. It appears that the building package site plan does not match the approved revised development Package DP16-0044 site plan for this lot. While the differences are minor and technically would not significantly require another revision at this time, please clarify the two following items; 1. The building square footage is 512 square feet larger than the square footage on the revised DP. Why is there a difference? 2. Per the revised DP there is a fenced off area along the northeast side of the shell building that is not depicted on this plan. Clarify if the fenced off area is dependent on the tenant that may occupy the east suite as possibly a food service use (restaurant) and off area is for an outside eating area/ patio. If so if and when the outside area as depicted on the revised DP is to be utilized will a separate permit be processed? 3. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage, location, and the building package site plan to ensure consistency with the DP. Zoning will also review the responses to items related to Comment 2 above. 4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the 3rd Party and PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Building Plans - Revised building package site plan |
| 01/25/2019 | STANTEC | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | AT 3RD PARTY OFFICE | Completed | |
| 01/25/2019 | KROBLES1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/25/2019 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |