Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: WALK THRU - COMM
Permit Number - T18CM08885
Review Name: WALK THRU - COMM
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/14/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/26/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet S2 (Plan); Structural Calculations (Sheet 28): The calculations indicate a W14 x 34 beam and a W14 x 43 column at Canopy A, while the plan indicates a W14 x 30 beam and a W14 x 38 column. Please clarify. 2. Sheet S3 (Detail A1); Structural Calculations (Sheet 30): The calculations indicate a footing for Canopy A that matches the information for Canopy B. Please clarify. 3. Sheet S6 (Detail 101); Structural Calculations (Sheet 7): The calculations indicate a 10" x 2 1/2" x 14 gauge purlin (with a provided section), while the Detail 101 indicates a 9" x 3" x 14 gauge purlin. Please clarify (the section input in the calculations uses a 9" x 3" x 14 gauge). 4. General: It appears the structural design information for Canopy A and Canopy B is reversed in the calculations from the structural drawings. Please revise. 5. General: Please add pilings and field welding to the Special Inspection Certificate. 6. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. Reviewed by Eric Newcomb Contact at 520-837-4911 or Eric.Newcomb@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/05/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/05/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/05/2018 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. Ref; Plan Sheet E3.3. Detail 4 shows the conduit being bonded to the grounded conductor. The conductor should be the equipment grounding conductor not the grounded conductor. #2. Provide a signed letter from the manufacturer of the service equipment stating that the proposed supply side PV interconnection utilizing existing busbar holes to perform the tap will not compromise the listing or performance of the equipment. Otherwise provide for a field evaluation by a certified listing agency after the tap is performed to maintain the listing of the equipment. Ref; 2012 IBC sec 107.2.1, 2011 NEC 110.3, and 250. |