Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T18CM07895
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/10/2019 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet S2.0 - Footing Schedule - F-1 footing size , the height is 16" , but the structural calculations ( sheet A-7 ) specifies 18" height , correct on plan . IBC 107.2.1. 2. Sheet A-1 references details B and C on Sheet A-4 , but sheet A-4 is not attached with plan set submitted . IBC 107.2.1. |
| 06/13/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/14/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | General: replot the mechanical sheets for legibility. 1. Not found. [Initial comment: Provide a completed COMcheck mechanical analysis. Reference: Section C103.2, IECC 2012.] 2. Not found. [Initial comment: Provide structural calculations and details to show how the air handler will be supported from the building structure. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012.] 3. Not found. [Initial comment: Provide an auxiliary or secondary condensate drain system. Reference: Section 307.2.3, IMC 2012.] 4. Not found. [Initial comment: Provide an analysis of the need for exhaust of the dust generated by granite cutting and finishing operations. Reference: Section 502.1, IMC 2012.] |
| 06/14/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | General: replot the plumbing sheets for legibility. 1. Show the slope of the building sewer. Explain the meaning of "U.C.O."; if it means "underground clean out", extend the cleanout to grade (see Section 708.9, IPC 2012). [Initial comment: Provide a site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building sewer and the location of its cleanouts and the connection to the public sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 2. The sewer riser on P-1 calls for 4" waste downstream of the sand interceptor but the plumbing plan specified 3" waste. The size of cleanouts must be the same as the pipe they service. [Initial comment: Explain the "existing 3" waste" shown on the sewer riser diagram.] |
| 07/01/2019 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/08/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T18CM07895 - New Building (Industrial Use - General Manufacturing) Related to DP18-0209 Building Plan Review (1st Review) Granite Fabricators 919 W. Fairview Business Park Place - I-1 / O-3 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 8, 2019 DUE DATE: July 8, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. ***Previous comments are still applicable, comment 4 was not addressed on plans, add the requested dimension as requested in previous comment 4. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the current unapproved version of the development package. While the building footprint is consistent with the DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Building footprint, Height, square footage, site conditions etc) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the building plans have been approved by the PDSD Commercial Plans reviewers. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. (Include a copy as reference of the approved and PDSD stamped version of the DP with the next building plan submittal. 3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning. 4. COMMENT: Label the height of the wall at the bottom of the roof ridge. 5. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the approved PDSD copy of the signed DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: building plans |
| 07/10/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Once all commercial review comments have been addressed, Engineering can conduct an over the counter review of the building plans. Call or Email to Schedule John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/01/2019 | PMARTIN1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |