Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T18CM07895
Parcel: 107070230

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T18CM07895
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/25/2018 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Sheet CVR; Code Review (Area); Sheet SD1 (Site Plan): The building area is listed as 4106 SF on Sheet CVR, and 4200 SF on Sheet SD1. Please clarify.
2. Sheet S2.1; Sections A and B: To use the presumptive maximum soil bearing value of 1500 PSF, the City of Tucson requires the bottom of footing to be located a minimum of
1'-6" below the finish slab or the finish grade, whichever is lower. Please indicate that on the drawings/details.
3. Sheet A-1; Wall Legend: Please coordinate the walls indicated in the Wall Legend with the walls shown on the plan.
4. Sheet A-1 (Floor Plan); Sheet A-3 (Sections 1 and 2): The section cuts on Sheet A-3 are reversed from the section cuts on the Floor Plan. Please verify.
5. Sheet A-2; Typical Handicap Restroom Dimensions: Please indicate the distance from the back wall to the centerline of the vertical grab bar per the ICC/ANSI Figure 604.5.1.
6. General: Please provide a Special Inspection Certificate with Parts A and B completed. This form can be located at www.tucsonaz.gov/PDSD.
7. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments.

Reviewed by Eric Newcomb
Contact at 520-837-4911 or Eric.Newcomb@tucsonaz.gov
11/02/2018 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Reqs Change Show the location of the proposed water meter, backflow preventer, and the water service pipe on a site plan. The development package is not a substitute for a complete site plan. Reference: Section 107.2.5, IBC 2012.
11/02/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide a site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building sewer and the location of its cleanouts and the connection to the public sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Explain the "existing 3" waste" shown on the sewer riser diagram.
3. Revise the design criteria for the water distribution system to account for the actual static lift to the highest fixture. Reference: Section 604.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
4. Revise the water distribution system design criteria to provide a pressure drop of 10 PSI for the specified reduced pressure zone assembly or as presented by the manufacturer. Reference: Section 604.1, IPC 2012.
5. Verify the equipment data for the water heater with the manufacturer's listing information. State the maximum factory-set temperature for the water heater. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012 and Section 607.1, IPC 2012.
6. Provide hot water to the service sink. Reference: Sections 202 and 607.1, IPC 2012.
7. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2339.86') is higher than the first floor elevation (2338.50'). Provide a backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
8. Clarify the method used to vent the Show that each trap and trapped fixture has been vented in accordance with one of the methods shown in the IPC. Reference: Section 901.2.1, IPC 2012.
9. Verify if a sand interceptor is required to prevent the discharge of heavy solids to the public sewer. If a sand interceptor will not be installed, show how the public sewer is to be protected from harmful discharges. Reference: Section 1003.5, IPC 2012.
11/05/2018 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Coordinate the envelope components shown on COMcheck with the construction drawings (e.g. R-30 or R-38 insulation and how is it installed in the metal building?).Reference: Section C103.2, IECC 2012.
2. The exterior walls of the retail and office areas are noted as having steel framing at 16" on center and R-19 cavity insulation. Provide a detail showing how the wall framing will be combined with the structure of the metal building. Reference: Section C103.2, IECC 2012.
3. Provide a completed COMcheck mechanical analysis. Reference: Section C103.2, IECC 2012.
4. Show the minimum energy efficiency rating (EER) or seasonal energy efficiency rating (SEER) the air conditioning unit in the equipment schedule. Reference: Section C403.2.3, IECC 2012.
5. Show that specified heat pump has a thermostatic control that provides for off-hour and set-back control, automatic shutdown and automatic start-up control (i.e. the thermostat is capable of automatically adjusting the start time of the HVAC equipment in order to bring the interior conditions to the desired temperature at the start of occupancy) and, if the thermostat does not require manual changeover from the heating and cooling modes, it restricts set point overlap. Reference: Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012.
6. Show how the HVAC controls are capable of reducing the outside air to the minimum flow rates required by Chapter 4, IMC 2012. Reference: Section C403.2.5, IECC 2012.
7. Provide structural calculations and details to show how the air handler will be supported from the building structure. Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012.
8. Provide maintenance access, a level service space, and a switched luminaire for the equipment in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions. Reference: Sections 304.1,306.3 and 306.3.1, IMC 2012.
9. Revise the size of the condensate drain for the air handler; the minimum size is ¾". Reference: Section 307.2.2, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.
10. Provide an auxiliary or secondary condensate drain system. Reference: Section 307.2.3, IMC 2012.
11. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans to show that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012.
12. Show the location of the termination of the restroom exhaust fans. Reference: Section 501.3.1, IMC 2012.
13. Provide an analysis of the need for exhaust of the dust generated by granite cutting and finishing operations. Reference: Section 502.1, IMC 2012.
14. Clarify why the air handler is scheduled to supply 1600 CFM but only 1388 CFM is noted on the mechanical plan. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
15. Secure the refrigerant circuit access ports of the condensing unit to prevent unauthorized access. Reference: Section 1101.10, IMC 2012.
11/06/2018 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response.
#1. Ref; Plan Sheet E3 Line Diagram. Indicate conduit and conductor sizes, types, for the secondary feeders to the electrical service equipment and feeders between the meter base and main disconnect switch.
#2. Verify that the exterior luminaire lamp color temperature output does not exceed 3500 Kelvin per Outdoor Lighting Code sec 402.1.
Ref; 2012 IBC sec 107.2.1, 2011 NEC. 2012 Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code.
11/07/2018 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change T18CM07895

1) Engineering has reviewed the building plans and they appear to be in conformance with the unapproved development package (DP18-0209)
2) Coordinate with Development Package (DP) to ensure that roof drains scupper underneath sidewalks. Reference City of Tucson Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 7-01.4.1.E
3) Once the DP has been approved and any outstanding commercial review comments have been addressed, Engineering can conduct an over the counter review of the building plans. Call or Email to Schedule

John Van Winkle, P.E.
John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007
11/07/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: T18CM07895 - New Building (Industrial Use - General Manufacturing) Related to DP18-0209
Building Plan Review (1st Review) Granite Fabricators
919 W. Fairview Business Park Place - I-1 / O-3 Zoning

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 7, 2018

DUE DATE: November 13, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the current unapproved version of the development package. While the building footprint is consistent with the DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Building footprint, Height, square footage, site conditions etc) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the building plans have been approved by the PDSD Commercial Plans reviewers.

2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. (Include a copy as reference of the approved and PDSD stamped version of the DP with the next building plan submittal.

3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning.

4. COMMENT: Label the height of the wall at the bottom of the roof ridge.

5. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the approved PDSD copy of the signed DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: building plans

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/07/2019 PMARTIN1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed