Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: 3RD PARTY REVIEW - COMMERCIAL
Permit Number - T18CM07563
Review Name: 3RD PARTY REVIEW - COMMERCIAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/22/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/26/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/29/2019 | AHINES2 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/29/2019 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Please resubmit updated drawings along with a detailed comment response letter, which states how all zoning review comments were addressed. I have reviewed the building plans for compliance with the issued development package (DP18-0067) and found that the building plans are acceptable as it relates to zoning requirements, which includes the building square footage, building height, building footprint, and location on the site. 1. COMMENT: Remove civil and landscape sheets. If requested, include the private utility sheet and mark "FOR REFERENCE ONLY". 2. COMMENT: Add keynote, like "under separate permit, DP19-0038", next to civil and landscape sheets in index. The sheets can be compiled together later on the job site. Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal to assure that any updates made to the building plans or the development package does not affect zoning requirements. Zoning cannot approve the building plans until all PDSD commercial plans reviewers have also approved the building plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact Alexandra Hines at 520-837-6975 or alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 09/04/2019 | ALEXANDRA HINES | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Please resubmit updated drawings along with a detailed comment response letter, which states how all design professional review comments were addressed. Design Professional or delegated staff will review the building plans on the next submittal to assure that any updates made to the building plans or the development package does not affect design requirements. Design Professional or delegated staff cannot approve the building plans until all PDSD commercial plans reviewers have also approved the building plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact Alexandra Hines at 520-837-6975 or alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 09/04/2019 | ALEXANDRA HINES | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | POSTER FROST MIRTO A RC HI T E CT U R E P LA NN I N G P RE S E R VA T I O N 317 North Court Avenue Tucso n, Arizona 85701 P H 5 2 0 . 8 8 2 . 6 3 1 0 F A X 5 2 0 . 8 8 2 . 0 7 2 5 www.posterfrostmirto.com DATE: August 30, 2019 TO: IID Design Review Committee c/o Koren Manning, Principal Planner Planning & Development Services, City of Tucson 201 N Stone Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85701 FROM: Corky Poster, Architect/Planner (AICP) City of Tucson On-Call Design Professional RE: IID-15-01, HPZ-14-11 Related Activity Numbers: DP-18-0067, T18PRE0006 Union on 6th 340 East 6 th Street, Tucson, AZ (includes 316 East 6 th Street, and 49-424 North Herbert) OWNER(S): Tigre Properties I, LLC; Honeybadger Happenings, LLC; Four Emeralds, LLC; Darlene Gaston; Wayne Hausknecht. ARCHITECT: VFLA and a.23 Studios PHASE: REVIEW OF PERMIT SET On August 20, 2019, in the 3 rd floor large conference room of COT P & DSD, I reviewed the full permit set of the construction documents for the above-cited project. I reviewed them for two hours and then discussed my findings with Architect Burak Bekat on the telephone and with Koren Manning in the room. I reviewed the set and confirmed several key items: A0.0: I confirmed that any substitutions must be approved by the Owner and the Architect. A0E.1: Unit 112 is a live-work space as promised. And is differentiated by brick (as per A3E.1) The internal patio is accessible from 6 th Street as promised. The detail at the 4 th Avenue SE complex entry gate is well done. A0E.4: The upper level setback form 6 th Street and 4 th Avenue was respected. A3E.1 (and others): Sunshades over double (D) windows on all sides but north as promised. A4E2.14: Steel tube sunshade awning detailed as promised. In addition, I have the following questions/findings: 1. The 2 nd and 3 rd level windows facing 4 th Avenue (A3E.1) has consolidated the two separate protrusions into a single larger one. That change is noted and accepted as equivalent. 2. The porcelain tile (non-decorative) size on the design renderings is shown as a smaller tile (4” or 6”). On the permit set (A3E.1) those tiles are shown as 12” or 16”. Please construct the project with the smaller porcelain tiles to give better detail at the pedestrian scale. 3. The promised mural on the final design submittal is not shown on A3W.2. Please ensure that this mural is included in the project as promised. Please submit final mural design to COT when complete. 4. The drawings show (A0E.3) the upper level balcony on 4 th Avenue allowing residents to come all the way to the east parapet (approx. 4’ tall) and overlooking 4 th Avenue. I strongly suggest that you place terrace planters in this area to keep people away from that overlooking edge. |
| 09/05/2019 | MASHFOR1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | Required Changes were added based on Martin Browns previously notes pertaining to this project concerning Fire hydrants and Fire Service expectations on dp18-0067 & T19cm05174. Please provide all deferred submittals to Tucson Fire Department for review as also indicated on this plans set for Fire Sprinklers/Alarms |
| 12/03/2019 | STANTEC | 3RD PARTY REVIEW-COMMERCIAL | AT 3RD PARTY OFFICE | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/03/2019 | PMARTIN1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |