Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T18CM07313
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/03/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Per section 5306.2.2 of the 2018 International Fire Code, fire sprinkler required in Medical Gas room (oxygen room). If no sprinklers are provided in the building, the sprinkler can be supplied from the domestic water system. A permit must be obtained for the installation of the sprinkler. |
| 10/20/2018 | PIMA COUNTY | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | BUILDING – COMMERCIAL The second floor has a single exit access stair. 517 NSF/ 15 SF per person per 2012 IBC Table 1004.1.2 based on function of the space rather than IBC Chapter 3 building use = 35 occupants. Since the building is not fire sprinkled Table 1021.2(2) requires there to be two means of egress out of the second floor space. Per Clayton Trevillyan, the Chief Building Official, the note on sheet A0.2 “PER COT BUILDING OFFICIAL, THE WAITING AREA AND BREAK ROOMS DO NOT NEED TO BE CALCULATED AS ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY, SO ALL “B” OCCUANCY” is incorrect. The 2012 IBC Table 1021.2(2) requires that for non-sprinkled buildings with “B” occupancy, the maximum exit access travel distance is 75-feet for a 2nd story with one means of egress. A rough takeoff using the 1st and 2nd floor plans shows approximately 125-feet travel distance from the most remote spot on the 2nd floor along the natural and unobstructed path of horizontal and vertical egress travel to the new lobby exit doors. Ref. 2012 IBC 1016.3. Since this is a non-sprinkled building please provide an exiting plan showing direction and loading of corridors and at each exit doors. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. Please revise the occupant load calculation in the Code Review Checklist based on the clarification of comment 1 above. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. Based on the clarification in item 1 above, please revise the plumbing calculations in the Code Review Checklist, sheet A0.2, for the new addition only to verify that two new toilet rooms, each with one lavatory and one water closet are sufficient for the added occupant load. Plumbing calculations for the existing portion of the building are not required as the previous building was permitted and use/plumbing calculation for it has not changed. Ref. 2012 IBC 2902.1.1. At the stair sections, sheet A3.3, a note states “nosings shall project 1-1/2” max. beyond the riser…” Per 2012 IBC 1009.7.5.1 nosings shall project no more than 1 ¼” beyond the tread below. On the new addition wall sections, sheet A3.4, the wall insulation is noted as R-19. However, on the wall types schedule, sheet A2.2 the wall insulation is noted as ”R-13 min.” Please change “R-13 min.” to “R-19.” Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. The building envelope COMcheck shows R-19 cavity insulation for exterior walls and also R-5.8 for exterior walls. However, the V-groove configuration for the board insulation only provides R-5.0 per note on elevation sheet A3.1. Please change the COMcheck value to R-5.0 and rerun. The building envelope COMcheck identifies widows and storefront as thermally broken. However, Specification Section 08411 – Aluminum-Framed Entrances and Storefronts 2.3(A)(2) does not require thermally broken framing members. Please revise specification. The building envelope COMcheck identifies the U-factor for storefront and windows as 0.50, while Specification Section 08411 1.1(A)(1) allows a maximum U-factor of 0.65. Revise either the COMcheck to 0.65 or the Specification to 0.50. They must match. On wall sections, especially 4/A3.4, there is minimum clearance between the Dryvit drainage track and the sidewalk. Detail OPMD 0.0.08 is referenced; however detail 0.0.09 or 0.0.10 is probably more appropriate. In either case, the drainage screed is shown located a minimum distance above the paving. If detail OPMD 0.0.08 is used, the minimum distance is 8”. Please review the wall sections base conditions and call out the appropriate detail and add drainage screed clear dimensions to the wall sections. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. Please revise Elevation Keynote 3 on sheet A8.1 to read “All new exterior windows and storefront shall have a max. U-factor of 0.5 and max. SHGC of 0.25.” The required maximum U-factor is for the assembly, not just the glazing. Ref. 2012 IECC Table C402.3. Please indicate safety glazing locations on the storefront elevations, sheet A8.1. Ref. 212 IBC Section 2406. Provide shear wall schedule on second floor framing need to match structural calculations sheet 58. |
| 10/20/2018 | PIMA COUNTY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | MECHANICAL – COMMERCIAL No mention in the Equipment Schedule is made for how restroom exhaust fans will be controlled to prevent recirculation of air into the occupied spaces outside the restrooms. Since there is supply air in the restrooms, the exhaust fans should be on a timer to run continuously while the building is occupied or interlocked with the RTU supplying air to the restroom. If interlocked, the RTU supply air fan should be set to run continuously when spaces are occupied. Ref. 2012 IMC 403.2.1. |
| 10/20/2018 | PIMA COUNTY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ELECTRICAL – COMMERCIAL Provide light fixture with maximum 3500K color temp. Page E1.3 |
| 10/20/2018 | KROBLES1 | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/20/2018 | PIMA COUNTY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLUMBING – COMMERCIAL WW Will need to see Pima County’s RWRD to pay for sewer fees, when changing from 5/8 meter to 1” water meter for commercial buildings. Prior to permit approval. |
| 10/25/2018 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Section Manager PROJECT: Pima Pet Clinic - Additions T18CM07313 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 25, 2018 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning has reviewed the building plan set for compliance with DP18-0127 and it appears that the building plans are in compliance. Zoning cannot approve until the building plans are approved by all other PDSD review agencies. Once the above comment is addressed Zoning will provide an over the counter review. Call or email to schedule an appointment for this review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/13/2018 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 11/13/2018 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/13/2018 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |