Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T18CM06089
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/26/2018 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Site Section Manager PROJECT: 1979 W. Valencia Road T18CM06089 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 26, 2018 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The building plans have been reviewed for compliance with development package DP18-0139 and appear to meet all requirements but until the DP is approved and the following comments have been addressed Zoning cannot approve the building plan. 3. Until all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 09/26/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T18CM06089 1) Engineering has reviewed the building plans and they appear to be in conformance with the unapproved Development Package (DP18-0139). Engineering cannot approve the building plans until all outstanding commercial review comments have been addressed and the development plan is approved. Engineering can conduct an expedited review of the building plans one the above comments are addressed and a new work flow has been opened. Call or email to schedule. John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 10/01/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/04/2018 | PIMA COUNTY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Reviewer: Chris Anderson, October 3, 2018 PLUMBING – COMMERCIAL Please contact Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department’s Industrial Wastewater Control Section at (520) 724-6200 regarding their required review of the proposed amalgam separator for this facility. Please verify that the selected lavatory faucets will deliver no more than 0.25 gallon per metering cycle per City of Tucson amendment to the 2012 IPC. |
| 10/04/2018 | PIMA COUNTY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Reviewer: Chris Anderson, October 3, 2018 ELECTRICAL The light pole base detail 1 on sheet E101 does not match the light pole base detail B1 on sheet S4.1. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. All exterior light fixtures in the Light Fixture Schedule, sheet E101, are specified with a color temperature rating of 4,000K. The 2012 City of Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code 402.1 limits color temperature for outdoor fixtures to 3,500K. Submit outdoor lighting lumen calculations in accordance with the 2012 City of Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code Table 401.1. Select a commercial lighting option for lighting area E3 and provide calculations in tabular form for allowable total lumens (fully shielded plus unshielded) and for total allowable unshielded lumens. The proposed total lumens and the proposed unshielded fixtures lumens shall match or be less than the allowable lumens. For each fixture indicate “fully shielded” or “unshielded”. Refer the definitions for each in the OLC. The photometric site plan on sheet E101 does not provide the information required. |
| 10/04/2018 | KROBLES1 | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 10/04/2018 | PIMA COUNTY | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Reviewer: Chris Anderson, October 3, 2018 BUILDING – COMMERCIAL Please submit the site utility plan for reference. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. The COMcheck on sheet G100 does not include the cavity insulation for exterior walls shown in the Wall Type Legend, sheet A201. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. In the Wall Type Legend, sheet A201, please add the R-values for the exterior wall continuous and cavity insulation. Per the COMcheck, the continuous 1 ½” insulation is R-7.5. Please provide the R-value for the 2 ½” cavity insulation. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. On this same schedule, two wall types have markers “F” and “6” that do not appear on the floor plan. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. On the Enlarged Men’s Room Floor Plan, sheet A203, the toilet compartment door shall not swing into the required minimum area of the compartment. Ref. ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009 Fig. 604.9.3.1(C). On the Finish Plan, sheet A204, the wall tile at the service sink in the Utility Room shall extend to the door jamb on the east wall. Ref. 2012 IBC 1210.2.2. On Wall Sections, sheets A602 and A603, revise keynote 4 to add R-value for 2 ½” cavity insulation. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. The Steel Column Schedule, sheet S2.1, specifies a ¾” x 12” x 12” base plate; however the structural calculations, sheet 30, require a ¾” x 14” x 14” base plate. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. |
| 10/04/2018 | PIMA COUNTY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Reviewer: Chris Anderson, October 3, 2018 MECHANICAL – COMMERCIAL Submit heating and cooling load calculations summary sheets to show that the building envelope components used in the calculations match the architectural drawings and that calculations were run for 104-degrees F summer db and 66-degrees F summer wb design temperatures, and 32-degrees F winter db design temperature. Ref. City of Tucson amendment to the 2012 IECC. The Package Heat Pump schedule, sheet M103, indicates the capacities for RTU’s 1 and 2 are based on 115-degrees F summer db ambient temperature. The ASHRAE summer db design temperature in Tucson is 104-degrees F. Reselect cooling equipment based on stated design temperature. Ref. City of Tucson amendment to the 2012 IECC. The Mechanical Load Summary on sheet M103 indicates 39,235 btuh (3.26 tons) difference between the selected cooling units’ capacity and the calculated cooling load. Please justify that the selected units have been sized with the smallest capacities available to accommodate the calculated load. Ref. 2012 IECC C403.2.2. The Exhaust Fan Schedule, sheet M103, has the remark “interlock with timeclock.” Please add to the note “time clock shall be set so that exhaust fan runs continuously while building is occupied” if that is the intent of your remark. Otherwise show how restroom air will not be recirculated into other spaces per 2012 IMC 403.2.1. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/30/2018 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |