Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T18CM05888
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10/16/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
10/17/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
10/17/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | A building envelope COMcheck was not found in the architectural plans. [Initial comment: Provide calculations for the building envelope (e.g. COMcheck) to demonstrate compliance with the energy code; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. As a minimum, the information shall include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration (NFRC fenestration product ratings required for the fenestration components). Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] |
10/18/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Clarify that the thermostatic mixing valve must be listed to ASSE 1070. [Initial comment: Provide tempered water for the public restroom lavatories using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012.] 2. Provide the dimensions of the downspouts. [Initial comment: Provide the dimensions of the rain gutters, their slopes, and the size of the downspouts. Reference: Section 1106.6, IPC 2012.] |
10/25/2018 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. As per the previous plan review comments and responses, the following comments were generated from the responses. #1. Comment and response to #1 (a) and #2 (a). Due to the information provided for the exterior lighting, the lumen calcs will need to include the existing lighting in the inventory along with the new as required per the OLC sec 104.1, 104.2.1. #2. The parcel size shown in the lumen calcs is incorrect. The cover sheet shows the site area as 5.53 acres, there fore the entire site must be included in the lumen calcs. sec 104.2.1(2).OLC. #3. Comment and response to #2 (b). Added note #4. Still missing note #5 on the plans. Ref; 2012 IBC 107.2.1, 2011 NEC, Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. |
11/01/2018 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Site Section Manager PROJECT: 427 N. Grande Ave #1 T18CM05888, T18CM05896 & T18CM05897 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 1, 2018 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. The building plans have been reviewed for compliance with development package DP18-0084 and appear to meet all requirements. 3. Until all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. 4. The Civil sheets C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6 and Landscape sheets L1.1, L2.1 & L2.2 are not part of DP18-0084 as indicated on the plan and have not been reviewed or approved. A new grading/landscape submittal review will be required and must be approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
11/01/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Development Package must be approved first. |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
11/28/2018 | AVAUGHN1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
11/28/2018 | AVAUGHN1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
11/28/2018 | AVAUGHN1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |