Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T18CM05456
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/12/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheets a3.0, a3.1, a3.2, and a4.0; Floor Plans: The City of Tucson requires all lettering (upper and lower case) to be a minimum of 3/32" in height. Please revise the building indicator 5/a7.1. 2. Previous Comments 23 and 24; Sheets a3.0 through a3.5 (Floor Plans); Sheets a7.0 and a7.1 (Building Sections): The section cuts 1/a7.0, 2/a7.0, 3/a7.1, and 4/a7.1 do not have the grid call-outs coordinated with the plans. Please revise. 3. Previous Comment 27; Sheet a3.3; Floor Plan Key Notes: Note 315 should be revised to match Key Note 329 on Sheet a3.0. Please revise. 4. Previous Comments 38 and 39; Sheets a4.0 and a4.1 (Floor Plans); Sheets a7.0 and a7.1 (Building Sections): The section cuts 1/a7.0, 2/a7.0, 3/a7.1, and 4/a7.1 do not have the grid call-outs coordinated with the plans. Please revise. 5. Previous Comment 50; Sheet s2.0; Foundation Plan: The reply to this comment indicated a Keynote 3 on Sheet s2.0 would be added to notch the footing around the column. That note was not located on the drawing. Please verify. 6. Previous Comment 51; Sheet s2.2; Stair Roof Framing Plan: The reply to this comment indicated a T1 schedule would be added to Sheet s2.0. That schedule was not located on the drawing. Please verify. 7. Previous Comment 52; Sheet s4.0 (Detail 211); Structural Calculations: The reply to this comment indicated the detail showed the guardrail size, base plate, and anchors per the calculations. No change was made to include these issues. Please verify. 8. Previous Comment 53; Sheet s4.0; Detail 205: The reply to this comment indicated Note 6 was added to the detail. No change was made to include that note. Please verify. 9. Previous Comment 54; Sheet s4.1; Detail 221: The reply to this comment indicated Note 3 was revised. No change was made to that note. Please verify. 10. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. Review by Eric Newcomb Contact at 520-837-4911 |
| 09/18/2018 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. As per the 1st electrical plan review comment . There was no written response to the comments found in the 2nd submittal plan documents. #2. The quantity on luminaires shown on the floor plans still does not correlate with the quantity shown in the Comcheck calcs. Ref; 2012 IBC 107.2.1, 2011 NEC |
| 09/18/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Show the location of the connection to the public sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 2. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide calculations to show that the roof scuppers are adequate to protect the roof from the rain load based on the current code requirements. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012.] |
| 09/18/2018 | QJONES1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 09/18/2018 | QJONES1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 10/03/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/18/2018 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 09/18/2018 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/18/2018 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |