Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: T18CM05456
Parcel: 11705069D

Address:
210 E 7TH ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T18CM05456
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/31/2018 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
08/02/2018 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Sheet a0.1; Project Data (Area + Occupancy): The allowable area calculation needs to be revised. The frontage increase percentage is 0.25. The allowable area for frontage is 0.25 x 6000 = 1500 SF, where 6000 is the allowable square footage per Table 503. The sprinkler increase (per Section 506.3) is 300% + the base area = 3 x 6000 + 6000 = 24,000 SF. The total allowable square footage is 1500 + 24000 = 25,500 SF. This is the allowable square footage for each story.
2. Sheet a0.1; Project Data (Area + Occupancy): The total square footage indicated (13,645) should separate the basement square footage and the first floor square footage since the allowable square footage is per story.
3. Sheets a0.2 and a0.3; Exiting Plans: Since this tenant improvement is for a shell only, the exiting will not be reivewed since no tenant spaces and occupant loads are established.
4. Sheets a0.4, a0.5, a0.6, and a0.7: Is the na in the title space indicating these sheets are not applicable to this permit? Please verify.
5. Sheet a2.0 (Ground Floor Demolition Plan); Sheet a2.1 (Ground Floor Demolition Reflected Ceiling Plan); Sheet a2.4 (Second Floor Demolition Reflected Ceiling Plan); Sheet a3.0 (Keynote Plan): Keynote 222 on Sheet a2.0 indicates to repair or replace the spiral stair, while Keynote 216 (Sheet a2.1), Keynote 220 (Sheet a2.4), and Keynote 324 (Sheet a3.0) indicate only to repair the stair. Please coordinate.
6. Sheet a2.4: This sheet is titled as the Demolition Plan for the Second Floor. Should this be the Ground Floor? Please verify.
7. Sheet a3.0; General Floor Plan Notes: Note 8 references Sheet a9.1. Please remove that reference.
8. Sheet a3.0; General Floor Plan Notes: Note 15 references Sheet f3. Please revise that reference.
9. Sheet a3.0; General Floor Plan Notes: Note 17 references Sheet a3.1 for the Dimension Plan and Finish Plan. The Dimension Plan is on Sheet a3.2. Please revise the reference.
10. Sheet a3.0 (Floor Plan Key Notes); Wall Legend: The exterior wall at Rooms 107, 108, and 109 references Key Note 308, which indicates a new wall. The Wall Legend indicates this is an existing masonry wall. Please coordinate.
11. Sheet a3.0; Key Notes: Note 317 indicates an accessible curb ramp per code. Details and notes must be provided on these drawings for that ramp.
12. Sheet a3.0; Key Notes: Notes 323, 332, and 344 were not located on the plan. Please verify.
13. Sheet a3.0; Key Notes: Note 331 indicates a new concrete ramp and handrail per code. Details and notes must be provided on these drawings for that ramp and handrail.
14. Sheet a3.0; Key Notes: Note 328 should indicate the detail and sheet numbers for the location of the details.
15. Sheet a3.0; Key Notes: Note 330 indicates a new raised platform. Details and notes must be provided on these drawings for the slab and the slab elevation.
16. Sheet a3.0; Key Notes: Note 340 should indicate the detail and sheet number for the location of the detail.
17. Sheet a3.0; Key Notes: Note 346 references Sheet a3.2 for a new frame wall. Please revise the reference.
18. Sheet a3.0; Key Notes: Note 348 indicates a code compliant floor transition. Details and notes must be provided on these drawings for that transition.
19. Sheet a3.0; Key Notes: Note 353 indicates to install a sump pump at light shaft per plumbing drawings. Please verify that the plumbing and architectural drawings are coordinated.
20. Sheet a3.0; Key Notes: Note 354 references a steel canopy per elevations and structural drawings. Nothing was found on the structural drawings. Please verify and revise the reference as required.
21. Sheet a3.0; Key Notes: Note 355 references steel canopy columns per elevations and structural drawings. Nothing was found on the structural drawings. Please verify and revise the reference as required.
22. Sheets a3.0 through a3.5; Plans: The City of Tucson requires all lettering (upper and lower case) to be a minimum of 3/32" in height. Please revise the building section indicators.
23. Sheets a3.0 through a3.5; Plans: A north/south building section (east of Grid Line 4) indicates 2/a7.0. Please revise.
24. Sheets a3.0 through a3.5; Plans: The building sections 3/a7.1 (east/west) and 4/a7.1 (north/south) are reversed. Please verify and revise as required.
25. Sheet a3.1; Wall Schedule: Wall Type D indicates to provide code compliant fire rating at all openings and penetrations. The wall type (fire wall, fire barrier, fire partition) must be identified on the drawings, and the fire resistance rating must be indicated. In addition, a U.L. Rating Number, or an Item Number from the IBC Table
721.1(1) must be indicated for the wall on the drawing. Verify on the drawings the requirements for penetrations (Section 714), joint systems (Section 715), opening protectives (Section 716), and ducts and transfer openings (Section 717), have been met.
26. Sheet a3.1; Finish Plan: Please indicate the description on the drawings for the wall designation F (at interior rated walls).
27. Sheet a3.3; Wall Schedule: Wall Type D indicates to provide code compliant fire rating at all openings and penetrations. The wall type (fire wall, fire barrier, fire partition) must be identified on the drawings, and the fire resistance rating must be indicated. In addition, a U.L. Rating Number, or an Item Number from the IBC Table
721.1(1) must be indicated for the wall on the drawing. Verify on the drawings the requirements for penetrations (Section 714), joint systems (Section 715), opening protectives (Section 716), and ducts and transfer openings (Section 717), have been met.
28. Sheet a3.3; Key Notes: Note 303 references an existing masonry wall. Does that note apply to this floor level? Please verify.
29. Sheet a3.3; Key Notes: Notes 314 and 318 were not located on the plan. Please verify.
30. Sheet a3.4; Wall Types: Are the interior walls indicated by a B designation intended to be D walls? Please verify.
31. Sheet a3.4; Wall Types: Is there a wall type B at this level? Please verify.
32. Sheet a3.4; Wall Types: Is there a wall type C at this level? Please verify.
33. Sheet a3.4; Wall Types: Is there a wall type E at this level? Please verify.
34. Sheet a3.6; Key Notes: Notes 306, 308, 309, 310, 312, 314, 319, and 320 were not located on the drawings. Please verify.
35. Sheet a3.6; Key Notes: Please verify in note 315 if the stair is to be repaired or replaced.
36. Sheet a3.6; Penthouse Plan: The plan indicates notes 501 and 513, but these are not in the Key Notes. Please verify.
37. Sheet a4.0; Key Notes: Because of the quantity of comments on Sheet a3.0 concerning the coordination of Key Notes, please review this sheet for the coordination of Key Notes to the Floor Plan. Verify all notes are indicated on the Floor Plan and are relevant to the plan area shown.
38. Sheets a4.0 and a4.1; Plans: A north/south building section (east of Grid Line 4) indicates 2/a7.0. Please revise.
39. Sheets a4.0 and a4.1; Plans: The building sections 3/a7.1 (east/west) and 4/a7.1 (north/south) are reversed. Please verify and revise as required.
40. Sheets a4.0 and a4.1; Plans: The City of Tucson requires all lettering (upper and lower case) to be a minimum of 3/32" in height. Please revise the building section indicators.
41. Sheet a4.1; Key Notes: Note 401 was not located on this plan. Please verify.
42. Sheet a4.1; Key Notes: Notes 402 and 406 are the same. Note 402 does not appear on the plan. Please verify.
43. Sheet a4.1; Key Notes: Note 405 indicates an existing window, while the plan indicates that note at an existing concrete column. Please verify.
44. Sheet a4.1; Key Notes: Note 408 indicates an existing lift, while the plan indicates that note at a light fixture (L-4). Please verify.
45. Sheet a4.1; Key Notes: Notes 409 and 411 were not located on the plan. Please verify.
46. Sheet a5.0; Key Notes: A Note 509 is located incorrectly on the west half of the existing roof (should be 510). Please verify.
47. Sheets a6.0, a6.1, a7.0, and a7.1: Please review these sheets for the coordination of Key Notes to the building sections and elevations. Verify all notes are indicated on the elevations and sections, and are relevant to the area shown.
48. Sheet a9.0; Detail 19: This wall is indicated as a rated wall. The wall type (fire wall, fire barrier, fire partition) must be identified on the drawings, and the fire resistance rating must be indicated. In addition, a U.L. Rating Number, or an Item Number from the IBC Table 721.1(1) must be indicated for the wall on the drawing. Verify on the drawings the requirements for penetrations (Section 714), joint systems (Section 715), opening protectives (Section 716), and ducts and transfer openings (Section 717), have been met.
49. Sheet a9.0; Details 15 and 17: Please identify these as handrails (Section 1012) or guardrails (Section 1013), and details as required.
50. Sheet s2.0; Foundation Plan: The foundation at the stair stringer indicates an F2 footing over an F1 footing. Will the C1 columns affect the actual construction of the F1 or F2 footings? Please verify.
51. Sheet s2.2; Stair Roof Framing Plan: Where are the T1 roof trusses shown or referenced? Please verify.
52. Sheet s4.0 (Detail 211); Structural Calculations: The calculations indicate a guardrail size, base plate, and anchors, while the detail does not. Please add that information to the detail.
53. Sheet s4.0; Detail 205: Please indicate Note 6 on the detail.
54. Sheet s4.1; Detail 221: If the stud wall indicated by Note 1 is supported by the existing truss, does Note 3 indicate the top chord of the truss? Please indicate on Note 3.
55. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments.
08/07/2018 ERIC NEWCOMB COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Passed
08/08/2018 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Provide an energy code analysis (i.e. COMcheck) for the renovations and repairs to the building envelope. Reference: Sections C101.4.2 and C101.4.3, IECC 2012.
08/08/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Show the location of the connection to the public sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
3. Provide calculations to show that the roof scuppers are adequate to protect the roof from the rain load based on the current code requirements. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012, and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012.
08/08/2018 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
08/14/2018 EHAMBLI1 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP
Lead Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: T18CM05456
Building Plan Review (1st Review)
210 E 7th St

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 14, 2018

DUE DATE: August 23, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. It appears exterior modifications, including demolition of walls and a loading dock, are being proposed. As site modifications, these will require an approved development package (DP) to be used for comparison at the time of the building plan review by zoning. Additionally, as a historic structure built in 1930, any demolition will require historic review. Please contact Allison Diehl in the PDSD Historic Review Section.

2. COMMENT: The proposed exterior modifications can be reviewed as minor modifications to existing commercial site. This still requires a development package submittal with a site plan. Please contact me for clarification on the process.

3. COMMENT: Once a development package has been approved and historic review completed, zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal to ensure consistency with the DP. (Include a copy of the most current or the approved and PDSD stamped version of the DP with the next building submittal.) The PDSD approved and signed copy of the DP shall not be incorporated into the building plans unless it is a PDSD approved and stamped copy.

4. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning.

5. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the PDSD approved and signed copy of the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact me at (520) 837-4966 or Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised building plans
08/14/2018 EHAMBLI1 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP
Lead Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: T18CM05456
Building Plan Review (1st Review additional)
210 E 7th St

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 17, 2018

DUE DATE: August 23, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. The building plans must be approved and signed by the PDSD Historic Review Section. Please contact Michael Taku at Michael.Taku@tucsonaz.gov.

2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal and verify Historic approval. If sufficiently stamped and signed, the building plans can be approved by zoning.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact me at (520) 837-4966 or Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised building plans
08/20/2018 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change T18CM05456

1) Refer to Zoning review comments. A development plan is needed for the proposed site work. Once the development plan is approved and any outstanding commercial review comments have been addressed Engineering can approve the building plans
2) A flood plain use permit is required and will be completed once the above comment is addressed

John Van Winkle, P.E.
John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007
08/20/2018 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide written response.
#1. The quantity of luminaires shown on the Comcheck does not correlate with the quantity shown on the floor plans. Please clarify.
#2. Identify the luminaires in the basement with a symbol or mark that correlates with the luminaire schedule and IECC calcs.
#3. Verify light source color temperature for the exterior lighting is in compliance with 402.1 (3500K). Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code.
Dan

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/05/2018 QJONES1 APPROVAL SHELF Completed
09/05/2018 QJONES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
09/05/2018 QJONES1 REJECT SHELF Completed