Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T18CM05361
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
07/17/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
07/18/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
07/18/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The portion of the building shell being modified in this activity does not appear to have been conditioned. Section C101.4.5, IECC 2012 requires the space to be brought into full compliance with the current energy code. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. Provide heating and cooling load calculations, using the exterior design conditions shown in Section 302.2, IECC 2012, as modified by the City of Tucson. 3. The supply storage room has an exhaust fan controlled by a time clock. What is stored in this room? Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
07/18/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
07/26/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet X1; Code Review Summary: The City of Tucson requires all lettering (upper and lower case) to be a minimum of 3/32" in height. Please revise. 2. Sheet X1; Code Review Summary: Please revise the IFC to the 2012 Edition. 3. Sheet X1; Code Review Summary (Construction Type): Per the IBC Chapter 6, the current construction type for this project is VB. Please revise all notations on this project. 4. Sheet X1; Code Review Summary (Allowable Area Increase): Per the IBC Section 508.3.2, the allowable area for nonseparated occupancies shall be based on the most restrictive of the occupancy groups. In this case, the U occupancy group allows 5500 SF, which is less than the B or S-1 occupancy groups. The allowable area would be 3 x 5500 + 5500 (see IBC Section 506.3) = 22,000 SF. Please revise this calculation on the drawing. 5. Sheet X1; Code Review Summary (Plumbing Fixture Requirements): Please add a note to your commentary indicating per the IBC Section 2902.3.2, the maximum allowable travel distance to these fixtures is 500 feet. 6. Sheet A2; Floor Plan 1: Please finish the elevation reference on the west end of the addition. 7. Sheet A2; Door Schedule Notes: A reference to these notes indicates 1/A1. Please revise that reference. 8. Sheet S1; Plans 1 and 2: Please add north arrows to the plans. 9. Sheet S1; Keynotes: On Note 8, please add to reference the Structural General Notes on Sheet S2-A4. 10. Sheet S2-A4; Wall Section 1: An enlarged detail references 5/S4. Please revise that reference. 11. Sheet S2-A4; Structural General Notes: Please add "Follow the requirements of the IBC Section 107.3.4.1 for deferred submittals" to Note 11. 12. General: Please provide structural calculations for this project. 13. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
07/30/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP Lead Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T18CM05361 Building Plans (1st Review), St. Cyril Addition 4725 E Pima St, R-1 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 30, 2018 DUE DATE: August 7, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. The proposed addition constitutes an expansion of use and requires an updated development package (DP). An approved development package (DP) is needed for comparison at the time of the building plan review by zoning. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. (Include a copy of the revised and approved DP (with PDSD stamp) with the next building submittal.) The PDSD approved and signed copy of the DP shall not be incorporated into the building plans unless it is a PDSD approved and stamped copy. 3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning. 4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the PDSD approved and signed copy of the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. 5. COMMENT: The revised DP could be potentially handled as an over-the-counter walk through. Please contact me if you wish to proceed in this manner. If you have any questions please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Building plans and revised and approved version of the DP as reference. |
08/01/2018 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
08/01/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T18CM05361 1) Refer to Zoning review comments 2) Show on plans that any roof drains (downspouts) scupper underneath sidewalks or pedestrian walkways. Reference City of Tucson (COT) Technical Standard (TSM) 7-01.4.1.E. Coordinate as needed with the required Development Package. John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
08/08/2018 | SVALENZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |