Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T18CM05262
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/24/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet PD; Required Accessible Seating; Exiting: Under the required accessible seating, the occupant load indicates 54 indoor + 20 outdoor seating for a total of 74 occupants. Under the exiting, initially the occupant load concurs with the accessible seating of 74 total occupants. However, the next calculation indicates 77 occupants indoor and 20 occupants outdoor for a total occupant load of 97. Please clarify. 2. Previous Comment 3; Sheet PD; Required Accessible Seating: Please verify the required accessible seating calculation for the occupant load discussion in comment 1. 3. Previous Comment 9; Sheet A-1; Key Notes (6): Note 6 was not located on the floor plan. Please verify. 4. Sheet A-1.1; Detail 3: The typical partition detail should provide the spacing of the wall studs. Please indicate. 5. Sheet A-1.1 (Detail 3); Sheet S5.2 (Detail B1): The stud walls at the hood must be non-combustible per the IMC Section 507.6. Please indicate on the architectural and/or structural drawings. 6. Previous Comment 12; Sheet A-4; Keyed Notes (5): Note 5 was not located on the reflected ceiling plan. Please verify. 7. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. Reviewed by Eric Newcomb Contact at 520-837-4911 |
| 10/01/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Comment not addressed. Include needed civil utility drawings with the building set. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). [Initial comment: Provide the civil plan referenced on sheet P-2 showing the location of the water meter, reduced pressure backflow assembly and the route of the water service to the building. Specify the material of construction for the water service pipe. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |
| 10/01/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not addressed; provide COMcheck for the building envelope. [Initial comment: Demonstrate energy code compliance for the building envelope using calculations based on the current code (e.g. COMcheck). Reference: Sections C101.3, C101.5, C103.2, C303, and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 2. The electrical plans did not use the requirements of C406.3 to calculate the reduced lighting power density. [Initial comment: Show how one of the "Additional Efficiency Package Options" (C406, IECC 2012) is to be accomplished. Reference: Section C401.2, IECC 2012.] 3. Verify that the model of the specified Honeywell TH8000 thermostat includes an "adaptive recovery" operation mode. [Initial comment: Verify that the control system for the specified HVAC units is capable of automatically adjusting the start time of the HVAC equipment in order to bring the interior conditions to the desired temperature at the start of occupancy. Reference: Section C403.2.4.3.3, IECC 2012.] 4. Comment not resolved; provide structural calculations. [Initial comment: Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hood is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2012 (the hood hanging weight plus the weight of personnel working in or on the hood). Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012.] 5. A wood-stud wall does not comply with the requirements of Section 507.9, IMC 2012 for clearances (i.e. it is not a non-combustible structure). [Initial comment: Show that the hood installation complies with Section 507.9, IMC 2012 for clearances (i.e. 18" clearance to combustibles).] |
| 10/01/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not addressed. Include needed civil utility drawings with the building set. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). [Initial comment: Provide a site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building sewer and the location of its connection to the public sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 2. Keynotes 11, 12, and 14 call for a "BFP" for the water connection to a beverage dispenser. The Watts LF007QT is listed to ASSE 1015 but a dual check valve with an atmospheric relief listed to ASE 1022 is required for beverage dispensers. [Initial comment: Appliances (e.g. beverage dispensers, ice makers, etc.) to be directly connected to the water supply system that do not have listed, integral backflow preventers or integral air gaps conforming to Section 608.13.1, IPC 2012 require backflow prevention. Specify the type of backflow prevention device required for each water connection. Water supply connections to beverage dispensers require backflow preventers conforming to ASSE 1022. Reference: Sections 608.1, 608.3, and 608.16.1, IPC 2012. 3. Show the vents for the grease interceptor on the plumbing waste plan (they are shown on the waste & vent schematic). [Initial comment: Verify that all of the vents (except for vents serving interceptors located outdoors) rise vertically to at least 6" above the flood rims of the fixtures they protect prior to running horizontally. (See the floor sinks and floor drains.) Reference: Section 905.4, IPC 2012.] |
| 10/03/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T18CM05262 - New Building (Food Service Use) Related to DP18-0169, S18-029, DP14-0167 Building Plan Review (2nd Review) Burger King 9175 S. Rita Road - C-2 per Rezoning Case C9-00-23 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 3, 2018 DUE DATE: October 12, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the current revised and approved version of the development package DP14-0167. While the building footprint is consistent with the DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Building footprint, Height, square footage, site conditions etc.) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the building plans have been approved by the PDSD Commercial Plans reviewers. The building plans indicate that there is an outside dining area that was not indicated on the revised DP14-0167. This area must be included on the revised DP or removed from the building plans. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. Contact Kelly Lee or Alexandra Hines for more information on the process for revising the DP, if the DP is to be revised to include the outside dining area. 3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning. 4. COMMENT: There is a Lot split application related to this project that has not been completed by the applicant. Copies of the recorded lot split documents have to be submitted to PDSD Zoning Review for final approval. Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the lot split application is completed. 5. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. 6. COMMENT: The building plan site plan indicates that outside seating is proposed. The revised and approved DP does not indicate any outside seating area which must be accounted for on the dp. Zoning cannot approve the building plans until the DP is revised to include the proposed outside seating area. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: building plans |
| 10/11/2018 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/12/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Engineering can conduct an over the counter review once the plans have been updated based on other department comments. If any revisions are need to the development package, those revisions will need to be completed prior to approving the building plans. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/23/2018 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 10/23/2018 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/23/2018 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |