Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T18CM05206
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/11/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Clarify the flow rate for the outside air for HP-1. It is calculated at 104 CFM for the ventilation, scheduled at 400 CFM for the heat pump, and the cooling/heating calculations use 450 CFM. Reference: Section C403.2.5, IECC 2012. 2. Provide the mechanical compliance certificate (COMcheck) to verify that the proposed heat pump complies with the requirements of C403 and C406, IECC 2012. 3. Clarify how the cooling load calculations support the selection of a 6-ton heat pump. Reference: Section C403.2.2, IECC 2012. 4. Call out the locations for EF-5 and EF-6. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 07/11/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 07/11/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 07/11/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 07/12/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet T.1.0; Code Review (Occupant Loads): The code review indicates two exits are required. Per the IBC Table 1015.1, only one exit is required for 35 occupants. Please revise the required number of exits to one. 2. Sheet T.1.0; Code Review (Plumbing Fixtures): The code review indicates one drinking fountain is required per 100 occupants. Per the IBC Table 2902.1, one drinking fountain is required per 1000 occupants. Please revise. 3. Sheet AS.1.0; Site Plan: Per the IBC Table 602, the fire separation distance from the new building to the existing residence requires a one hour fire resistance rating for the new north wall (per Keynote 29 on Sheet A.1.0). Please provide a U.L. listing number for that wall, or an IBC reference number per Table 721.1. 4. Sheet A.1.0; Floor Plan: Do any hazardous materials used or stored in this building require special consideration per the IBC Section 414? Please verify and list on the drawings. 5. Sheet A.1.0; Floor Plan: The plan indicates a property line at the northeast corner of the building that aligns with the exterior face of the new building. That does not appear to match the site plan on Sheet AS.1.0. Please verify. 6. Sheet A.1.0 (Floor Plan); Sheet A.4.0 (Keynotes): Is the new north wall a one hour rated wall (Keynote 29 on Sheet A.1.0), or a two hour rated wall (Keynote 32 on Sheet A.4.0)? Is the wall less than five feet from the property line, or between five feet and ten feet from the property line? 7. Sheet A.1.1; Millwork Elevations (6A and 6B): Please provide elevation dimensions not shown. 8. Sheet A.1.3; Detail 15: In note 3, please indicate the size and quantity of wall anchors. 9. Sheet A.4.0; Sections A and B: These sections indicate the property line aligning with the exterior face of the new building. Please verify. 10. Sheet A.5.0; Keynotes: Note 7 references Sheet A.5.1 for a skylight and curb detail. Please revise the sheet reference. 11. Sheet A.5.0; Keynotes: Note 8 references Sheet A.5.1 for an evaporative cooler and curb detail. Please revise the sheet reference. 12. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 07/26/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T18CM05206 - New Building (Automotive Service Major) Related to DP18-0089 Building Plan Review (1st Review) Brake Masters 1935 E. Broadway Boulevard - Zoning C-1 and C-2 per Rezoning Case C9-18-06 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 26, 2018 DUE DATE: August 8, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the current unapproved version of the development package. While the building footprint is consistent with the DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Building footprint, Height, square footage, site conditions etc.) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the building plans have been approved by the PDSD Commercial Plans reviewers. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. (Include a copy as reference of the approved and PDSD stamped version of the DP with the next building plan submittal.) 3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning. 4. COMMENT: Revise on the architectural site plan the number of parking spaces provided. There are only 25 spaces drawn and accounted for on both the DP and Architectural site plan. However the parking count for the number of spaces provided on the architectural plan is listed as 26. Revise as required. 5. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: building plans |
| 07/26/2018 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. Ref; Plan Sheet E.0.The Outdoor Lighting calcs and Lumen Schedule show two 'X2' luminaires. There are three total on the site plan. Please clarify. Ref;2012 IBC sec 107.2.1. Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. |
| 07/31/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T18CM05206 1) Engineering has reviewed the building plans and they appear to be in conformance with the unapproved Development Package (DP). Once the DP has been approved, any outstanding commercial review comments on the building plans have been addressed and a new work flow has been opened, Engineering can conduct an over the counter review and approval. John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/13/2018 | AVAUGHN1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |