Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T18CM05195
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/27/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. General: It appears changes were not made to the drawings for this second submittal. Please provide responses to all review comments from the first submittal. |
| 10/01/2018 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/08/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Verify that adequate dynamic water pressure (30 - 90 PSI) is available for proper operation of the emergency showers. Reference: Sections 303.2 and 604.3, IPC 2012.] 2. Comment not resolved; provide calculations showing how the water supply piping has been sized. [Initial comment: Provide calculations showing how the water supply piping has been sized. Note that emergency eyewashes and showers have continuous supply demands (20 GPM for the Haws 8300 FP) and the use of plumbing fixture units is not appropriate. Reference: Sections 604.1 and 604.3, IPC 2012.] 3. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: The emergency shower/eyewash specification calls for the installation of a Haws model 9201H tempering valve. Provide an installation detail and show the source of hot water. Reference: Section 303.2, IPC 2012.] 4. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide a freeze-proof emergency shower/eyewash that does not rely upon below-grade stop-and-waste valves. Reference: Section 608.7, IPC 2012.] 5. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide the dimensions of the gutter and downspout. Reference: Sections 1106.1 and 1106.6, IPC 2012.] |
| 10/08/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Demonstrate energy code compliance for the building envelope using calculations based on the current code. Reference: Sections C101.3, C101.5, C103.2, C303, and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 2. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Show how one of the "Additional Efficiency Package Options" (C406, IECC 2012) is to be accomplished. Reference: Section C401.2, IECC 2012.] 3. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide heating and cooling load calculations, using the exterior design conditions shown in Section 302.2, IECC 2012, as modified by the City of Tucson.] 4. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Secure the refrigerant circuit access ports of the condensing units to prevent unauthorized access. Reference: Section 1101.10, IMC 2012.] 5. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Coordinate the location of EF-2 with the architectural building elevations. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |
| 10/15/2018 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. As requested per the previous electrical plan review comments. There was no written response located in the second submittal. It appears there are no changes on the plans in relation to the first submittal and electrical review. This plan review could not be completed due to insubstantial information on the drawings. Please submit complete electrical drawings as required per the City of Tucson Commercial Submittal Requirements (ELECTRICAL). These requirements can be printed or downloaded from www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd. Please provide the information requested per the first review. Also provide complete panel schedules. And distinguish what is relative to building #3. Also it was noted that this building has an 'H' Classification, Indicate if the wiring methods of NEC Chapter 5 will be required. First review electrical comments. "Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. Distinguish between new and existing electrical equipment on the One Line Diagram. #2. Specify the location of '2SES'. #3. Provide for a UFER (concrete encased grounding electrode) and other bonding required at the new building. NEC 250.50, 250.32, 250.104 #4. Provide complete compliance with the Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code for the exterior lighting. #5. Provide complete load calcs for the electrical service including the new panels. #6. Provide complete compliance with the 2012 IECC for the lighting. Ref; 2012 IBC 107.2.1, 2011 NEC" |
| 10/17/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T18CM05196 - New Building #3 (Truck Depot Parking - TEP) Related to DP18-0088 Building Plan Review (1st Review) Tucson Electric Power 3950 E Irvington Road - Zoning is PAD 34 / per Rezoning Case C9-18-03 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 1, 2018 DUE DATE: August 8, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the approved version of the development package. While the building footprint is consistent with the DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Building footprint, Height, square footage, site conditions etc.) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the building plans have been approved by the 3rd Party and PDSD Commercial Plans Reviewers. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. 3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the 3rd Party and PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning. 4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the 3rd Party and PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. 5. COMMENT: Label the height of the north wall on the elevation and cross section drawings. The maximum height proposed and approved on the DP is 27 feet. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: building plans |
| 10/18/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T18CM05195 1) Engineering has reviewed the building plans and they appear to be in conformance with the approved DP. Engineering cannot approve the plans as there are outstanding commercial review comments. 2) Engineering can conduct an over the counter review/approval once any outstanding review comments have been addressed and a new work flow opened. Call or Email to schedule John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/14/2018 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |