Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T18CM04423
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/30/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Previous Comment 1; Sheet A1.0 (Site Plan); Sheet A3.0 (Floor Plan): It appears the distance between the west wall of the new addition is 20' from the east wall of the existing building. If the imaginary property line (per Section 705.3) would be placed 10' from the west wall of the addition, and 10' from the east wall of the existing building, Table 602 would indicate for VB or IIB construction, that Groups A, R, and I would not require exterior walls to be rated. Please verify the occupancy group and the construction type for the existing building west of this project. Revise the imaginary property line as required, and provide a new analysis for the exterior walls as required. 2. Previous Comment 7; Sheet S1.1A; General Structural Notes (Foundations): A copy of the geotechnical report was not included in this submittal. Please provide. 3. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 09/10/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/10/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The kitchen fixture schedule still shows K-45 being indirectly wasted. [Initial comment: Hand sinks (e.g. K-45) cannot be indirectly wasted. Hand sinks must drain to the grease waste system unless the sink has a sign posted above it stating, "HANDWASH SINK ONLY! NO FOOD PREPARATION OR DISHWASHING ALLOWED." Reference: Sections 301.3, 802.1, and 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 2. The kitchen fixture schedule still shows K-38 and K-39 being indirectly wasted. [Initial comment: Provide justification for sink K-38 and dipperwell K-39 not being directly connected to the grease waste system. Reference: Sections 301.3, 802.1, and 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] |
| 09/11/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Demonstrate energy code compliance for the addition to the building envelope and the new mechanical system using calculations based on the current code (i.e. provide COMcheck). Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, C103.2, C303, and C401.2.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 2. Nothing on the food service drawings indicates that the makeup air unit is equipped with a recirculating water system. [Initial comment: Verify that the evaporative cooling section of the makeup air unit is equipped with a recirculating water system. Reference: Section 928.2, IMC 2012 and ARS Title 45, Chapter 1, Article 12. See text at: (http://www.azleg.gov/viewdocument/?docName=http://www.azleg.gov/ars/45/00313.htm).] |
| 09/11/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T18CM04423- New Building Addition - Ref. DP18-0066 Bistro Addition Building Plan Review (2nd Review) 210 N. Maguire Avenue - O-3 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 11, 2018 DUE DATE: September 24, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the Building Plans for the Bistro addition but cannot approve them at this time. While the building footprint is consistent with the approved version of the DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Building footprint, Height, square footage that is under review zoning cannot approve the building plans at this time PDSD Commercial Plans reviewers have approved the building plans. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. 3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning. 4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Building plans |
| 09/20/2018 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. Per the previous plan review comments from 7/9/18. (a) Comment #3 requesting GFI protected receptacle in the kitchen and food prep areas is still not addressed in the plans. NEC 210.8b(2). (b) Comment #4 requesting kitchen equipment 55 to be included on the Kitchen Equipment Schedule. No compliance with this comment. Ref; 2012 IBC 107.2.1, 2011 NEC. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/20/2018 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 11/20/2018 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/20/2018 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |