Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T18CM04234
Parcel: 132130490

Address:
1025 E BENSON HY

Review Status: Active

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T18CM04234
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Active
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/11/2018 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change Need architectural/building department to determine Level of Renovation per 2012 International Existing Building Code.
06/20/2018 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Sheet G002; Sheet Index: Please add Sheets A601 and A602 to the index.
2. Sheet SD001; Code Data: Please indicate the first and second floor occupant loads for Building AA, and the occupant load for the new addition.
3. Sheet SD001; Code Data: Per the IBC Section 903.2.8, the addition (R-1 Occupancy Classifrcation) requires an automatic sprinkler system per Section 903.3. Please indicate on the drawings.
4. Sheet SD002; Existing Building Data: Per the IBC Table 503, the allowable floor area (per story) for an R-1 occupancy classification with VB construction (non-sprinklered) is 7000 SF. The existing bujilding AA indicates 7522 SF for each of the first and second floors. Please verify.
5. Sheet A100; Ground Floor plan: Using the IBC Section 508.3.2, please indicate on the drawing the allowable building area and height for Building AA and the addition if the buildings are separated.
6. Sheet A100; Ground Floor Plan: Using the IBC Section 508.4.2, please indicate on the drawing the allowable building area and height for Building AA and the addition. If the buildings are separated.
7. Sheet A101; Floor Plan 1: Is building AA separated or non-separated from the addition? Reference the IBC Sections 508.3 and 508.4.
8. Sheet A101; Floor Plan 1: Does the south wall of Building AA have a fire resistance rating? If so, please indicate the construction of the wall and provide a U.L. Listing number on the drawing.
9. Sheet A101; Floor Plan: Please include an exiting plan for the addition including occupants from Building AA in this plan.
10. Sheet A101; Floor Plan: The employee unisex restroom in the addition seems to indicate an existing wall on four sides. Should these walls have a keynote 16 reference? Are they existing walls? Please verify.
11. Sheet A101; Floor Plan: Is a high/low drinking fountain indicated on this plan? Please verify.
12. Sheet A101; Floor Plan: With automatic sprinklers in the new addition, many issues may change. Per the IBC Section 708.3, dwelling/sleeping unit separations may be reduced to 1/2 hour fire resistance rating. Per the IBC Table 1018.1, corridor separations may be reduced to a 1/2 hour fire resistance rating. Per the IBC Table 509, the laundry room separation may be reduced to 0. Please review all options concerning fire resistance ratings and sprinkler systems.
13. Sheet A101; Floor Plan: Please provide the plumbing calculations on the drawings for required water closets, lavatories, drinking fountains, and service sinks. A high/low drinking fountain was not located on the plans.
14. Sheet A101; Floor Plan: A separation door will be required between the Building AA corridor at the first floor and the addition. Please verify.
15. Sheet A101; Floor Plan: Per the IBC Section 708.3(2), the walls between the sleeping units must be fire resistance rated. Please indicate on the plan.
16. Sheet A601; Door Schedule: Please verify fire rated doors are indicated as required.
17. Sheet S001; General Structural Notes (Foundation): Note 1 indicates a geotechnical report was involved in this design. Please provide one copy of that report for review.
18. General: The City of Tucson requires all lettiering (upper and lower case) shall be a minimum of 3/32" in height. Please revise on all sheets.
19. General: Please provide two sets of structural calculations for review. Additional comments may be included in the next review.
20. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments.
06/20/2018 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide the size and serial number of the water meter serving the hotel.
2. Provide the size of the backflow preventer associated with the water meter.
3. Provide the civil drawings that show the location of the water meter, backflow preventer and the water service pipe.
4. Verify the available range of water pressure with Tucson Water. Revise the water pressure calculations as needed.
06/21/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Lined water heaters with a heat input of 200,000 BTU per hour or more, an operating water temperature of 210ยบ F or greater, or a nominal water containing capacity of 120 gallons or more are required to comply with the rules contained in Article R20-5-404 (Standards for Boilers, Lined Hot Water Heaters and Pressure Vessels) of the Arizona Administrative Code. http://apps.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_20/20-05.pdf. Lined hot water heaters require 36" of clearance on each side of the water heater unless the Arizona Administrative Division approves alternative clearances.
2. Revise the location of the sediment trap to be downstream of the appliance shut off valve, as close to the equipment as possible (compare the gas riser detail on P2.2 with the gas dirt leg w/ SOV detail on P0.1). Reference: Section 408.4, IFGC 2012.
3. Verify that the specified metering faucets for the public lavatories (i.e. rooms 105 and 115) will dispense a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-09.
4. Provide tempered water for the public restroom lavatories (i.e. rooms 105 and 115) using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012.
5. Use an approved 2-way cleanout fitting only at the junction of a building drain and a building sewer; otherwise, cleanouts shall open to allow cleaning in the direction of flow (P1.0 and P1.1). Reference: Sections 708.3.5 and 708.5, IPC 2012.
6. A dishwasher may not discharge through a hydromechanical grease interceptor but it is required to discharge through a gravity grease interceptor. Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
7. Hand sinks in the kitchen are allowed to connect to the sanitary waste system instead of the grease waste system only if each sink has a sign posted above it stating, "HANDWASH SINK ONLY! NO FOOD PREPARATION OR DISHWASHING ALLOWED." Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
06/21/2018 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the addition to the building envelope and the mechanical systems using calculations based on the current code. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, C103.2, C303, and C401.2.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
2. Provide heating and cooling load calculations, using the exterior design conditions shown in Section 302.2, IECC 2012, as modified by the City of Tucson.
3. Show that each rooftop unit (AC-3a, AC-5a, and AC-5b) has a thermostatic control that provides for off-hour and set-back control, automatic shutdown and automatic start-up control (i.e. the thermostat is capable of automatically adjusting the start time of the HVAC equipment in order to bring the interior conditions to the desired temperature at the start of occupancy) and, if the thermostat does not require manual changeover from the heating and cooling modes, it restricts set point overlap. Reference: Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012.
4. Provide mechanical ventilation for the residential portions of the building. Reference: Section R403.5, IECC 2012 and Section 403.3, IMC 2012.
5. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains from AC-3a, AC-5a, and AC-5b. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.
06/21/2018 ERIC NEWCOMB COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Approved
06/29/2018 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response.
#1. Provide full compliance with the Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. See chapter 104 for plan submittal requirements. This Code can be printed or downloaded from www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd.
#2. Identify all electrical equipment power and lighting including the electrical equipment shown on the one line diagram.
Ref: 2012 IBC sec 107.2.1, 2011 NEC, Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code.
Dan Santa Cruz,
Commercial Electrical Plan Review
Dan.santacruz@tucsonaz.gov
07/02/2018 EHAMBLI1 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP
Lead Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: T18CM04234 - Addition and Tenant Improvement
Building Plans (1st Review) Red Roof Inn Conversion
1025 E Benson Hwy, C-2 and I-1 Zoning

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 2, 2018

DUE DATE: July 6, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.


1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. The development package has been returned for corrections and was not available for comparison at the time of the building plan review by zoning.

2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. (Include a copy of the most current or the approved and PDSD stamped version of the DP with the next building submittal.) The PDSD approved and signed copy of the DP shall not be incorporated into the building plans unless it is a PDSD approved and stamped copy.

3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning.

4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the PDSD approved and signed copy of the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning.


If you have any questions please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Building plans and current or approved version of the DP as reference.
07/11/2018 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Needs Review The DP must be approved first.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/07/2018 ANY REJECT SHELF RECEIVED