Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T18CM04086
Parcel: 11508100C

Address:
1110 N STONE AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T18CM04086
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/06/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: T18CM04086 - New Building (Commercial - Food Service)
Building Plan Review (1st Review) Popeye's Restaurant
1110 North Stone Avenue - C-3 Zoning

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 6, 2018

DUE DATE: June 21, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.


1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the approved development package. While the building footprint is consistent with the approved DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Building footprint, Height, square footage, site conditions etc) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the PDSD Commercial Plans reviewers have approved the building plans.

2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. (Include a copy of the approved and PDSD stamped version of the DP with the next building submittal.)

3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the 3rd Party or PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning.

4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning.

5. COMMENT: The North and South Elevation drawing have been labeled incorrectly. The elevation labeled as north is actually the south elevation and vice versa. Re-label the north and south elevations accordingly.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revise building plans
06/07/2018 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Sheet CS200; Egress Plan: Per the IBC Section 1015.2.1, exit doors shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one-half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the building or area being served. The two exit doors in the dining area indicate 27'-0" separation distance. Please indicate the diagonal distance of the area that those two doors serve (from the northwest corner of the Dining Area to the southeast corner of the Sales Area). The distance between the two exits is less than one-half of that diagonal length. Please verify.
2. Sheet CS200; Egress Plan: Please indicate on this sheet the maximum exit access travel distance is 200' per the IBC Table 1016.2.
3. Sheet SD125; Detail 15: The City of Tucson requires all lettering (upper and lower case) to be a minimum of 3/32" in height. Please revise.
4. Sheets A001 and A002: The City of Tucson requires all lettering (upper and lower case) to be a minimum of 3/32" in height. Please revise.
5. Sheet A100: The City of Tucson requires all lettering (upper and lower case) to be a minimum of 3/32" in height. Please revise the Section/Elevation indicators for the sheet number.
6. Sheet A100; Floor Plan: Please remove the circular suspended soffit indicated in the Dining Room.
7. Sheet A100 (Floor Plan); Sheet A426 (Section 4): The Floor Plan indicates Section 4/A426 is cut in the southeast corner of the east exterior wall. Section 4/A426 is a ladder section. Please revise.
8. Sheet A100; Section 6: Please add an enlarged detail for the top wall plate connection to the roof structure. That detail will vary according to the direction the trusses are running.
9. Sheet A100; Floor Plan: An enlarged plan at the Cooler/Freezer indicates 10/A124. Please revise that reference number.
10. Sheet A102: The City of Tucson requires all lettering (upper and lower case) to be a minimum of 3/32" in height. Please revise the interior finish schedule.
11. Sheet A103; Section 1: Please provide all stud sizes and connections of those studs to each other, to bracing, to trusses, etc., or add a reference for that information.
12. Sheet A103: The City of Tucson requires all lettering (upper and lower case) to be a minimum of 3/32" in height. Please revise the Section indicators for the sheet number.
13. Sheet A125; Elevation 3: There are two "C" elevations. Please revise.
14. Sheet A125; Enlarged Plan 1: The City of Tucson requires all lettering (upper and lower case) to be a minimum of 3/32" in height. Please revise the Elevation indicators for the sheet number.
15. Sheet A200; Roof Plan: The City of Tucson requires all lettering (upper and lower case) to be a minimum of 3/32" in height. Please revise the Section indicators for the sheet number.
16. Sheet A300; Detail 4: The Section A cut on the parapet indicates Sheet 1/A200. Please revise.
17. Sheet A301; Elevation 2: The Elevation call-out on Sheet A100 is on the north wall, while Elevation 2 on Sheet A301 indicates South Elevation. Please coordinate.
18. Sheet A301; Elevation 3: The Elevation call-out on Sheet A100 is on the south wall, while Elevation 3 on Sheet A301 indicates North Elevation. Please coordinate.
19. Sheet A301; Detail 20: The City of Tucson requires all lettering (upper and lower case) to be a minimum of 3/32" in height. Please revise the Section.
20. Sheet A425: The City of Tucson requires all lettering (upper and lower case) to be a minimum of 3/32" in height. Please revise the Wall Sections.
21. Sheet A426; Section 2: The Section indicates the roof trusses parallel to the wall. The trusses should be bearing on this wall. Please coordinate.
22. Sheet S101; Foundation Plan: Please indicate the holdowns (HD) outside the foundation wall. Some are not legible.
23. Sheet S601; Section 304: Please indicate in Note 7 the soffit to be connected to the 2x4 hangers is per the manufacturer.
24. Sheet S601; Section 305: Note 2 is not indicated on the Section, and Note 7 is indicated on the Section but not included in the Notes. Please revise.
25. Structural Calculations: Please include a plan in the calculations that identifies the location of the shear walls.
26. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments.
06/08/2018 ERIC NEWCOMB COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Approved
06/13/2018 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing (e.g. roof insulation: R20 or R16?). Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Coordinate how one of the "Additional Efficiency Package Options" (C406, IECC 2012) is to be accomplished. The mechanical and interior lighting compliance certificates call for reduced interior lighting power while the envelope compliance certificate calls for high efficiency lighting. Reference: Section C401.2, IECC 2012.
3. Verify that the installer setup menu for the specified programmable thermostat includes off-hour and set-back control, automatic shutdown and automatic start-up control (i.e. the thermostat is capable of automatically adjusting the start time of the HVAC equipment in order to bring the interior conditions to the desired temperature at the start of occupancy) and, if the thermostat does not require manual changeover from the heating and cooling modes, it restricts set point overlap. Reference: Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012.
4. Based on the drawing note on the CaptiveAire shop drawings disclaiming responsibility for the information on the drawings, the registrant's seal is to be removed. Reference: Arizona Revised Statutes 32-125, Board of Technical Registration Rules R4-30-304.
5. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hood is supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2012 (the hood hanging weight plus the weight of personnel working in or on the hood). Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012.
06/13/2018 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
06/13/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Provide a site drawing showing the location of the proposed gravity grease interceptor, the size, route, and slope of the building sewer, the location of all cleanouts in the building sewer, and the location of the connection of the building sewer to the public sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
3. Southwest Gas, the local gas utility, provides natural gas at 7" WG, 2 PSIG, and 5 PSIG. Appliances needing gas service at 7" WG or greater (e.g. the fryer system) will require a gas meter that delivers at least 2 PSIG gas into a regulator located after the meter set. Reference: Section 402.1, IFGC 2012.
4. Verify the natural gas input for the rooftop units. The mechanical schedule show RTU-2 and RTU-3 each having an input of 63 MBH but the Carrier literature shows the 48HCED07 model with two-stage gas heat with 82 MBH for the first stage and 125 MBH for the second stage. Similarly, the Carrier 48HCED12 is listed with two-stage gas heat with 180 MBH for the first stage and 224 MBH for the second stage. Reference: Section 402.1, IFGC 2012.
5. Provide automatic faucets for the lavatories, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Verify that each cycle of the automatic faucets will operate for at least 10-seconds for accessibility. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-09.
06/22/2018 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change T18CM04086

1) Sheet A450, Drain Leader Detail 3. Show on plans that any roof drains (downspouts) scupper underneath sidewalks or pedestrian walkways. Reference City of Tucson Technical Standard (TSM) 7-01.4.1.E. Coordinate placement of scuppers with the approved Development Package

John Van Winkle, P.E.
John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007
06/22/2018 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response.
#1. Provide complete compliance with the Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. See chapter 104 for plan submittal requirements. This Code can be printed or downloaded from www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd.
#2. Ref; Plan Sheet E4.2. The Arc Flash label has the incorrect system voltage.
Ref; 2012 IBC sec 107.2.1, 2011 NEC, Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/11/2018 KROBLES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed