Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T18CM04035
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/26/2018 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/26/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | |
| 09/26/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Since each building is served by its own water meter, revise the plumbing fixture schedule to coordinate the number of fixtures with the drawings. [Initial comment: Revise the plumbing fixture schedule to coordinate the number of fixtures with the drawings (e.g., each unit has five water closets and there are four units per building therefore there are 20 water closets per building, not 32). Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 2. See S & V riser diagram 3/P201 for 3" S down from 2nd floor, typical, 2 places. [Initial comment: Horizontal branches shall connect no closer than ten diameters downstream of the bases of vertical stacks. Reference: Section 704.3, IPC 2012. 3. Clarify the storm drainage calculations on sheet A103. [Initial comment: Clarify the storm drainage calculations on sheet A103. There are no scuppers on the building. Provide the slope of the proposed gutters and consider the roof area that is tributary to each downspout when determining the gutter size.] |
| 09/26/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Comment not resolved; DP18-0050 shows one water meter serving both buildings while sheet as1.0 shows one water meter for each building. [Initial comment: Verify the need for a reduced pressure backflow preventer at the water meter with Tucson Water.] |
| 10/18/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Please resubmit sheets without referencing Type A or Type B units; Section 1107.7.2 of the IBC does not require for multi-story dwellings to be constructed as Type B dwellings where no elevator is provided. Also, Type A units are not required where the total number of dwellings is less than 20 on a single lot. IBC 1107.7.2. 2. Sheet a401, Detail 2 is specifying a typical 2-hr. fire resistance area separation wall which would normally be used for the separation between townhomes found in section R302.2 of the International Residential Code. The building classification which has been assigned for this project is R-2 RESIDENTIAL/APARTMENTS by the designer. Please provide an explanation on the intent for the use of the area separation wall and whether whis would change the classification to R-2 townhomes or condominiums. IBC 310.1. 3. The list of Deferred Submittals could not be located on the cover sheet as noted on the written responses provided. Please provide the Deferred Submittals list for roof/floor trusses and any other applicable components. IBC 107.3.1. 4. On sheet S002 of the structural drawings, the table which contains SYMBOLS, PLAN ABBREVIATIONS, MATERIAL contains non-readible font. Please correct this situation as noted on the previous plan review comment. IBC 107.2.1. Please provide written responses to all plan review comments. You may also contact me with any questions you may have on the 2nd plan review comments at: 520-837-6962 or 480-518-0931. Gilbert Peru Contract Plans Examiner Gilbert.Peru@tucsonaz.gov gperu@willdan.com |
| 10/24/2018 | QJONES1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T18CM04035 1) Engineering has reviewed the building plans and they appear to be in conformance with the approved DP. Engineering cannot approve the plans as there are outstanding commercial review comments. 2) Engineering can conduct an over the counter review/approval once any outstanding review comments have been addressed and a new work flow opened. Call or Email to schedule John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 10/24/2018 | QJONES1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP Lead Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T18CM04035 and T18CM04039 - New Apartment Building Building Plans (2nd Review) 1129 E. 7th Street TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 24, 2018 DUE DATE: October 24, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans in reference to the revised development package (DP18-0050), but cannot approve them at this time. It appears all Zoning comments from previous reviews have been addressed. 2. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers, the building plans can be approved by Zoning. 3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of revised building plans by Zoning. If you have any questions please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised building plans. |