Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T18CM03853
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/22/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/24/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The descriptions of the envelope components are not included on the drawings. The roof does not appear to have a continuous insulation component. Provide fenestration descriptions on the drawing that include the maximum allowable U-value and maximum SHGC; fenestration performance factors must be certified in accordance with NFRC (see footnote b on the COMcheck envelope assemblies section). [Initial comment: Provide calculations for the building envelope to demonstrate compliance with the energy code; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. As a minimum, the information shall include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] |
| 08/24/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Re-label the two restrooms to coordinate with the floor plan on sheet A101. [Initial comment: Section 2902.2, IBC 2012 requires that separate toilet facilities be provided for each sex in occupancies with 15 or more occupants. In addition, Section 2902.3, IBC 2012 requires distribution of fixtures based on 50% for each sex unless otherwise approved by the building official.] 2. The submitted calculations are for rectangular scuppers; round scuppers will require different calculations. Note that each scupper serves a distinct portion of the roof and surrounding vertical walls. [Initial comment: Provide hydraulic scupper size calculations for the round scuppers based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour and a maximum storm water level based on the structural capacity of the roof. Reference: Sections 1106.1, 1106.4, and 1108.3, IPC 2012 and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012.] 3. Revise the elevations as required to show the scuppers to scale. [Initial comment: Show the location of the secondary (overflow) scuppers on the building elevations.] |
| 08/31/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T18CM03853 1) Update sheet as100 (site plan) to match the most current version of DP18-0008. For example the pathway to the trash enclosure has been updated. 2) Engineering can conduct an over the counter review once the above comment has been address and any outstanding comments from other departments have been addressed. John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 09/06/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T18CM03853 - New Office Building Building Plan Review (2nd Review) - I-1 Zoning 910 W. Glenn St. TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 6, 2018 DUE DATE: September 13, 2018 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. An approved development package (DP) is needed for comparison at the time of the building plan review by zoning. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal to ensure consistency with the DP. (Include a copy of the most current or the approved and PDSD stamped version of the DP with the next building submittal.) The PDSD approved and signed copy of the DP shall not be incorporated into the building plans unless it is a PDSD approved and stamped copy. 3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning. 4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the PDSD approved and signed copy of the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. 5. COMMENT: The site plan in the building package does not match the approved DP site plan. The site shall be revised to match the DP and the building plans re-submitted for review and to verify consistency with the approved DP. (The Loading zone is missing and the pedestrian path to the enclosure does not match the DP.) Revise the building plan site plan or the DP. As of this building plan review the DP has been approved but not issued. There are still outstanding site fees. The building plans cannot be issued until the DP fees have been paid and issued. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: building plans |
| 09/10/2018 | SVALENZ1 | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Needs Review |