Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T18CM02702
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/15/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Previous Comment 2; Sheet G0.1; Three Hour Wall Detail 2: Please revise the title to indicate this is a three hour fire barrier detail. 2. Previous Comment 2; Sheet G0.1; Three Hour Wall Detail 2: The referenced IBC Table 721.1(2)3-1.4 requires a 5.3" minimum finished thickness face-to-face, which is greater than the actual thickness (5.1") listed per the NCMA. The IBC Table 707.3.10 only requires a two hour fire barrier which could be achieved per the Table 721.1(2)3-1.4 (4.2" minimum). Please review and revise as required. 3. Sheet S1.0 (Detail 3); Structural Calculations (Sheet 1): The calculations indicate 2-#4 in the bottom of the foundation, while Detail 3 indicates the 1-#4 top and bottom. Please coordinate. 4. Sheet S1.0; Detail 10: Please indicate the foundation reinforcing and reference Detail 3/S1.0 for that reinforcing. 5. Sheet S1.0; Structural Notes (Foundation and Earthwork): Please reference per the geotechnical evaluation by Western Technologies, Inc.an allowable soil bearing value of 1500 psf at a minimum 1.5' below finish grade may be used. 6. Sheet S1.0 (Detail 6); Structural Calculations (Sheets 4 and 8): The calculations indicate 2-#5 hairpin reinforcing at the building frames, while Detail 6 indicates 1-#5. Please coordinate. 7. Sheet S1.0 (Detail 11); Structural Calculations: Please provide structural calculations for the foundation design at the masonry separation wall. 8. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 08/22/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The calculated water demand (23.8 GPM) will require the installation of a 1" water meter. [Second Comment: The water demand shown on P-1 does not include the existing plumbing fixtures or the evaporative coolers. Section E103.3 (2.1) of Appendix E, IPC 2012 states that fixture units cannot be used for constant use items such as hose bibbs. Add a separate demand value for hose bibbs and evaporative coolers to the demand determined using fixture units. The total demand for the water is about 32 GPM, which will require a 1" water meter.] [Initial comment: Calculate the total water demand that will be served by the existing water meter. Include the service sink, hose bibbs, and the required water dispenser in addition to the water closets and lavatories. Verify that the size of the existing water meter is adequate for the new load. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |
| 08/22/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/22/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide the revised COMcheck for the envelope and the mechanical systems. [Second comment: The COMcheck report shows that the building fails (18% worse than code requirements). In addition, using the High Efficiency HVAC additional efficiency package (Section C406, IECC 2012), will require that the unit heaters have a combustion efficiency of 90% or greater.] [Initial comment: Demonstrate energy code compliance for the addition to the building envelope using calculations based on the current code. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, C103.2, C303, and C401.2.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 2. Provide the sequence of operation for the two building exhaust fans (EF-1 and EF-2). [Second comment: The heating load calculations show a heating load that is about half of the stated heating capacity of the two unit heaters. Note that mechanical ventilation will be required when the evaporative coolers are not operating.] [Initial comment: Provide heating load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating equipment specified for the project and provide sufficient heat to maintain a minimum temperature of 68 F on a design-heating day (32 F). Reference: Sections C302.2, C403.2.1, and C403.2.2, IECC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012 and Section 309.1, IMC 2012.] 3. The specified Reznor UAES unit heaters call for the installation of a concentric vent system (horizontal or vertical) with a condensate drain. Modify the installation detail per the manufacturer's instructions. [Second comment: The specified unit heaters are Category III units with power vents (i.e. intake air plus a separate exhaust vent) and the exhaust vent will require a thimble for the roof penetration.] [Initial comment: Specify the type of venting systems and the venting materials to be used for the proposed unit heaters. Reference: Section 503.1, IFGC 2012]. |
| 08/27/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP Lead Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T18CM02702 Building Plan Review (3rd Review) 1301 S Tyndall Ave TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 27, 2018 DUE DATE: September 5, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal to ensure consistency with the DP. (Include a copy of the most current or the approved and PDSD stamped version of the DP with the next building submittal.) The PDSD approved and signed copy of the DP shall not be incorporated into the building plans unless it is a PDSD approved and stamped copy. 3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning. 4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the PDSD approved and signed copy of the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. 5. Once the above comments have been addressed, Zoning can complete an over the counter review. Please email to set an appointment time. If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact me at (520) 837-4966 or Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised building plans |
| 08/29/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T18CM02702 1) Once any outstanding department review comments have been addressed, Engineering can conduct a final over the counter review and approval of the building plans. Call or email to schedule John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |