Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T18CM02424
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/25/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 05/29/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet A3.0; Door Schedule: Please reference Sheet SP3 for the Door Hardware Schedule. 2. Sheet A3.0; Floor Plan: The floor plan indicates no plumbing fixtures. Per the IBC Section 2902.3.2, required toilet facilities shall be located so that the path of travel does not exceed a distance of 500 feet. Please indicate this requirement on Sheet A3.0. 3. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. I apologize that these comments were not indicated in the first review. |
| 05/29/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide the revised energy code analysis (COMcheck). [Initial comment: Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing. Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 2. Provide the revised energy code analysis (COMcheck). [Initial comment: Show how one of the "Additional Efficiency Package Options" (C406, IECC 2012) is to be accomplished. Reference: Section C401.2, IECC 2012.] |
| 05/29/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Refer to the State of Arizona General Permit for De Minimis Discharges to Waters of the U.S. (http://azdeq.gov/sites/default/files/final_dmgp_2016.pdf) See section B (6) in Part 1 (on page 6): the document makes the distinction that only residential evaporative coolers are considered De Minimis and are can be allowed under the general permit. You have two choices with commercial evaporative coolers: prevent the cooler discharge from draining to an adjacent waterway by keeping it on site or apply for a separate discharge permit from ADEQ. [Initial comment: Process liquids (e.g. blowdown from evaporative coolers) may not be discharged as storm water. Reference: Section 701.4, IPC 2012.] |
| 06/07/2018 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comment. Also provide a written response. As per the previous electrical plan review comment #1c,"Could not refer to project # M3-PN124055 for the existing lumen calcs. Provide a permit or activity number if available. Otherwise provide a lighting site plan with the locations and complete inventory of all exterior luminaires". …. The response to that comment was to refer to activity T12CM07876, the lighting calcs for that project show total lumens for at 393,750 shielded lumens and a parcel size of 3.8 acres. This does not correlate with the existing lumens shown on your lumen calcs and parcel size for the proposed new exterior lighting. Please provide a lighting site plan with the locations of all proposed and existing exterior lighting, and up to date lumen calcs, as required per the Outdoor lighting Code sections 102.4, 104.2. Dan.santacruz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/13/2018 | MMORENO1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | FROM: Michael Moreno PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T18CM02424 - New Shop Building Building Plan Review (2nd Review) Tucson Subaru 4901 N Oracle Rd. TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 13, 2018 DUE DATE: June 18, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the approved development package. While the building footprint and the site revisions are consistent with the approved DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Building footprint, Height, square footage, site conditions etc) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the Commercial Plans reviewers have approved the building plans. 2. COMMENT: In addition, the building plans must be approved by the PDSD commercial plans reviewers before zoning can approve the plans. The development package sheets provided in the building plan set should either be the approved set or marked as reference; or removed from the building set completely and submitted as a reference copy of the approved and signed development package. 3. COMMENT: Once the plans have been approved by all Commercial Plans reviewers and no site changes are made that affect zoning requirements, zoning will stamp and sign the building plans as it pertains to the zoning review purview. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Michael.Moreno@Tucson.az.gov at any time during the week |