Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T18CM02424
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
04/24/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
04/24/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Clarify the dimensions of the overflow scuppers - detail 2/A3.1 calls for 4" x 24" scuppers. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Process liquids (e.g. blowdown from evaporative coolers) may not be discharged as storm water. Reference: Section 701.4, IPC 2012. |
04/24/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing. Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Show how one of the "Additional Efficiency Package Options" (C406, IECC 2012) is to be accomplished. Reference: Section C401.2, IECC 2012. |
04/24/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the serial number and size of the water meter that will be supplying water to this building and total demand that the water meter is serving. |
04/24/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet T1: Please provide on this sheet the plumbing fixture calculations for the Shop Building, including water closets, lavatories, drinking fountains, and service sinks. Use the IBC Table 2902.1. |
04/24/2018 | QJONES1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | APPROVED BY ENEWCOMB |
04/26/2018 | MMORENO1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Michael Moreno PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T18CM02424 - New Shop Building Building Plan Review (1st Review) Tucson Subaru 4901 N Oracle Rd. TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 26, 2018 DUE DATE: April 26, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the approved development package. While the building footprint and the site revisions are consistent with the approved DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Building footprint, Height, square footage, site conditions etc) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the Commercial Plans reviewers have approved the building plans. 2. COMMENT: In addition, the building plans must be approved by the PDSD commercial plans reviewers before zoning can approve the plans. The development package sheets provided in the building plan set should either be the approved set or marked as reference; or removed from the building set completely and submitted as a reference copy of the approved and signed development package. 3. COMMENT: Once the plans have been approved by all Commercial Plans reviewers and no site changes are made that affect zoning requirements, zoning will stamp and sign the building plans as it pertains to the zoning review purview. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Michael.Moreno@Tucson.az.gov at any time during the week |
04/27/2018 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. Ref: Plan Sheet EL103. Outdoor Lighting. (a) As noted, full cut-off under canopy lighting is exempt from lumen calcs, however not from light source color temperature requirements (3500K). Please verify. Section 402.1. (b) A special inspection will be required outdoor lighting per section 106.2.1. Comply with section 104.2.2 (c) Could not refer to project # M3-PN124055 for the existing lumen calcs. Provide a permit or activity number if available. Otherwise provide a lighting site plan with the locations and complete inventory of all exterior luminaires. #2. The electrical site plan ES101 does not correlate with the Architectural plan AS1. Provide an electrical site plan that clearly shows the locations of the proposed New Service and Shop Buildings include the Showroom. #3. Provide 2012 IECC compliance for lighting. Ref: 2012 IBC sec 107.2.1, Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. |
05/04/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
05/18/2018 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |