Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T18CM00822
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/26/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet M-1; Sheet Index: Please revise the Sheet Index to include all sheets and to remove those sheets not in this submittal. 2. Sheet M-1; Parcel Detail with Setbacks: This plan indicates the roof projection of the parking structure is 1'-6" from the property line. The minimum allowable clear distance from the roof projection to the property line is 2'-0". Please revise the structure location as required. 3. Sheet M-1 (Project Description); Sheets L-1 and L-2A (Photovoltaic System Array Data): Sheet M-1 indicates 60 photovoltaic modules, while Sheets L-1 and L-2A indicate 70 modules. Please coordinate. 4. Sheet M-1; Parcel Detail with Setbacks: The face of the parking structure columns must be a minimum of 5'-0" clear from the property line. Please indicate the actual clear distance on the plan. 5. Sheet L-2A; Purlins: Please provide the purlin design and connections in this submittal. 6. Sheet L-2B; Steel Frame Section: The steel frame design and the design of the I-beam Connection Detail were not included in this submittal. Please provide. 7. General: The cover sheet for the footing design calculations indicates the footings were calculated using the 2012 IRC, and the structure was examined and appeared to be in compliance with the 2012 IRC. This is a commercial project and should comply with the 2012 IBC. Please revise and verify/provide all calculations required. 8. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 03/05/2018 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. Minimum text font is to be no smaller than 3/32". #2. Include the total maximum DC voltage and current available feeding the inverter. #3. Justify why the inverter is rated at maximum 9.5KW on the DC side and the system DC KW is 17.5KW. Why would this inverter be suitable? NEC 110.3, 690.4D. Ref: 2012 IBC sec 107.2.1, 2011 NEC, City of Tucson Commercial Plan Submittal Requirements. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/06/2018 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 03/06/2018 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/06/2018 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |