Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T17CM09407
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/08/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet T1.0; Code Analysis (Allowable Area): The General Building Summary indicates there is a sprinkler system, but the area increase for sprinklers indicates 0. Please coordinate and revise. 2. Sheet T1.0; Code Analysis (Occupant Load): Does the occupant load calculation include the patio square footage? The occupant load for exiting does not need to include the patio, but the required number of plumbing fixtures should include the patio occupants. Please verify. 3. Sheet T1.0; Code Analysis: A note indicates the plumbing requirements to be provided per the tenant improvement plans. However, restroom calculations are provided with this shell permit. Please coordinate. 4. Sheet A2.2; Notes: Note 6 references specifications. Are specifications included in this permit set? Please verify. 5. Sheet A2.3; Roof Plan: Detail 15/A8.2 is referenced on the east side of the plan at the entry door. This detail indicates a double parapet. This does not appear to be a double wall. Please clarify. 6. Sheets A2.4 and A2.5; Keynotes: Notes 9 and 19 reference specifications. Are specifications included in this permit set? Please verify. 7. Sheet A3.1; Keynotes: Notes 3 and 4 reference specifications. Are specifications included in this permit set? Please verify. 8. Sheet A8.3; Detail 4: Please indicate the steel pipe size, or reference another detail. 9. Sheet S0.0; Structural Notes (General): Note 2 indicates a soil report was used for the foundation design. Please provide one copy of that report for review. 10. Sheets S1.0 and S2.0; Plans: Please add a north arrow on the sheet plans. 11. Sheet S1.0 (Foundation Plan); Sheet S3.0 (Shear Wall Design): Please move the Shear Wall Schedule to Sheet S1.0 to be with the holdown locations and size, or move the Holdowns Schedule to Sheet S3.0. 12. Sheet S2.0 (Roof Framing Plan); Sheet A2.3 (Detail 2): The structural plan does not indicate the metal panel per the architectural Detail 2. Per that detail, the 3" B-deck is supporting the metal panel over a steel beam. Please verify this panel requires no other support, and provide a structural detail at that location, including how the metal panel is connected to the structure. 13. Sheet S2.0; Roof Framing Plan: Detail 11/S5.0 (on the east side of the building at the entry door) should include the extended roof that shows up on Detail 15/S5.0. Please add. 14. Sheet S3.0; Shear Wall Schedule: Why does the Shear Wall Schedule have seven walls indicated, and the Shear Wall Plan only indicates two different shear walls? 15. Sheet S3.0; Holdowns: Use this sheet or Sheet S1.0 to indicate holdowns. It is clear on Sheet S1.0, but not clear on Sheet S3.0. 16. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 01/09/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Verify that the specified booster pump system comes complete with a low-pressure cutoff to protect the booster pump per Section 606.5.5, IPC 2012. 2. The installation of a grease interceptor will be required by Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department for the proposed tenant. Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Provide dimensions for the "thru-wall sheet metal scupper(s)" described in keynote 10 on sheet A2.3. Show how secondary drainage will be provided or present structural calculations per Section 1101.7, IPC 2012. Reference: Section 1108.1, IPC 2012. |
| 01/09/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide calculations (e.g. COMcheck) for the building envelope to demonstrate compliance with the energy code; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. As a minimum, the information shall include maximum U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the maximum SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C302.2, C403.2.1, and C403.2.2, IECC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012. |
| 01/09/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 01/17/2018 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/23/2018 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: 203 E. Speedway Blvd T17CM09407 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 23, 2018 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Until development package DP17-0266 is approved the building plans cannot be approved. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 02/06/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/28/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/15/2018 | LPEREZ2 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 02/15/2018 | LPEREZ2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/15/2018 | LPEREZ2 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |