Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - T17CM09288
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/12/2018 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/20/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/26/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Comment not resolved. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the building, building sewer, etc.). Provide a site plan showing the installation of the water service to the building. Specify the material of construction for the water service pipe. [Initial comment: Provide the site utility plan showing the location of the proposed water meter, backflow preventer, and the water service pipe. Specify the size of the proposed water meter and the size of the reduced pressure backflow assembly being installed. Specify the material of construction for the water service pipe. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf] |
| 02/26/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not resolved. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to the building, building sewer, etc.). Provide a site plan showing the installation of the building sewer. Specify the material of construction for the building sewer. [Initial comment: Provide the civil site utility plans referenced on sheet P-1 that show the material, size, route, and slope of the building sewer and the location of its connection to the public sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 2. Comment not resolved. Coordinate the details and calculations on sheet A3. [Initial comment: Coordinate the vertical opening dimensions of the scuppers as shown in details 5/A3, 6/A3 and the drainage calculations in roof plan 1/A3. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |
| 03/01/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/01/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/08/2018 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. As per the previous electrical plan review comment # 2. It was requested to provide an available fault current analysis and available fault current at the loadcenters. Ref: Plan Sheet E-5. Shows the available fault current at panel 'MDP' as 25.7k, however the panel schedule shows the panel rated at 22k. Please clarify. #2. As per the previous electrical plan review comment # 3. Ref: Plan Sheet E-2. It was requested to provide full compliance with the Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. The information provided was insufficient to verify compliance with this Code. Revise the lumen calcs to include the following information. (a) Parcel size in acres and total allowed lumens per table 401.1. Include the lighting area and option used from the table. (b) Total applicable lumens, include all new (S1, S2) and existing lighting on the parcel. (c) Luminaire inventory must include the existing exterior parking and any other existing exterior lighting on this parcel. (d) Provide a complete luminaire schedule for all exterior luminaires, include shielding information and lamp color temperature output. (e) Color temperature cannot exceed 3500K, section 402.1. (f) Indicate whether or not a special inspection is required. Per section 104.2.2, 106.2. (g) Provide the sections for any exceptions used. Please see section 104 of this Code for plan submittal requirements. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/15/2018 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 03/15/2018 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/15/2018 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |