Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T17CM09258
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2018 | PIMA COUNTY | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T17CM09258 – PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Reviewer: Chris Anderson, Larry Chavez, January 9, 2018 BUILDING – COMMERCIAL Submit a completed City of Tucson Development Services Department Code Analysis Data sheet. The code compliance information on sheet A-1 does not provide all required information. Indicate if the use (Group B Professional Office) is existing or a new use. Indicate if the building meets the tabular limits of Chapter 5 for general building height and area or is the fire sprinkler system be used to modify the allowable building area. Indicate if the building is being submitted as having non-separated occupancies (508.3) or with separated occupancies (508.4). On sheet A-1 the Code Compliance Information takes the entire square foot area for each floor and divides each floor area by 100 to arrive at the occupant load. This does not comply with the methodology of 2012 IBC Section 1004 as clarified by the ICC Code and Commentary to determine the occupant load and must be revised. Although this building is a “B” use the total occupancy load for egress purposes is determined by adding the occupancies of individual spaces in the building with their occupant loads calculated in accordance with the uses indicated in IBC Table 1004.1.2. My calculations are as follows: The use for second floor is predominately business with the occupant load calculated using 100 gross SF per occupant. However there are also spaces (break rm 201, conference rm 217, program conference rm 248 and executive conference rm 249) where occupancies are calculated at 15 net SF per occupant. Take the gross floor area (area within interior faces of exterior walls and not including vent shafts) of 13,179 SF and subtract the areas of these spaces (531 SF + 307 SF + 426 SF + 270 SF = 1,534 SF). Divide the remaining area of 11,645 SF by 100 to get an occupant load of 117 for the business portion of this floor; and divide 1,534 SF by 15 to get an occupant load of 102 for the assembly uses on this floor. The total occupant load for the 2nd floor is 219. Calculate the first floor occupancy in a similar manner. 12,933 gross square feet – 2,283 SF for non-business uses = 10,650 GSF/100 = 107 business occupants. 701 SF/15 for conference rm 109 = 47 occupants + 710 SF/20 for classroom 110 = 36 occupants + 203 SF/15 for training/conference rm 114 = 14 + 429 SF/20 for skills/training rm 122 = 21 occupants + 240 SF/15 for conference rm 136 = 16 occupants. The total occupant load for the first floor is 241. Delete the “Occupancy Load 1-Story building” from the Code Compliance Information, sheet A-1, as this does not apply to this project. Indicate the number of square feet on the first floor only and the second floor only. Provide plumbing fixture calculations per 2012 IBC Table 2902.1 based on a total occupancy load of 460 for this building to confirm the amounts of plumbing fixtures shown on the floor plans. Provide a demolition plan, specifically indicating how the existing exterior walls and roof assemblies are being modified. Clarify if existing insulation is being removed and replaced or left as is. On the floor plans, provide a legend where appropriate showing New, Existing & To-be-removed walls. Graphically show the maximum exit access travel distance and indicate the required maximum allowed travel distance. Show or state that the means of egress complies with chapter 10. At the stairs and the doorway serving the most occupants, show or state compliance with means of egress sizing. Show On the reflected ceiling plansA-4 thru A-7, indicate what work is new and what work is existing. Show required exit signs on the plans and show the exit sign symbol in the legend. On the section drawings A-8 & A-9, the drawings do not distinguish between new and existing construction, especially Sheet A-8. Indicate the work is being depicted with notes. If no work is called for, indicate, “No work this area,” and indicate the referenced area. On Sheet A-10, Wall section D2, show a detail screeds at the bottom of the wall that complies with IBC 2512.1.2 Weep indicating 2” clearance from paved areas and 4” above earth. Ditto D1 & D3 sheet A-11, and generally where occurs. On the elevations show or state what work is indicated in the drawings—Is all the glass, is all the stucco new? On sheet A-14, provide a roof plan and show and callout the work. Is there work on the roof? Is the entire roof being replaced? What is happening with the roof top units? |
| 01/12/2018 | PIMA COUNTY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | MECHANICAL – COMMERCIAL Provide mechanical load calcs. |
| 01/12/2018 | PIMA COUNTY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ELECTRICAL – COMMERCIAL The architectural floor plan sheet A-2 indicates that there is no work at the south building addressed 626 N. Craycroft Rd. However sheet E-1 shows electrical work. Mark as “separate permit” as appropriate. Provide Outdoor Lighting Code documentation showing compliance. Outdoor lighting code require led to have a maximum color temperature of 3500K. Provide cut sheet for fixtures that meet this requirement. |
| 01/12/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/16/2018 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: United Cerebral Palsy T17CM09258 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 16, 2018 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Sheet A-1 either needs to be the approved development package, DP18-0001, or marked for reference only or removed from the building plans set. 3. The building plans have been reviewed for compliance with development package DP18-0001. Although the building plans appear to comply with the development package, until the building plans are approved by all other PDSD review agencies zoning cannot approved the building plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 12/21/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/22/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the natural gas piping design to clarify the developed pipe lengths, the misplaced notes, the gas loads for each branch, and the routing of the pipes. Specify how the pipe sizes were determined. Show the routing of the gas piping to K-3 and K-4. Reference: Sections 402.1 and 402.3, IFGC 2012 and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Provide specifications for the kitchen appliances and plumbing fixtures. Verify the number of ranges in the kitchen; the drawings show two ranges. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 3. Verify that the discharge from the dishwasher will be 140 degrees Fahrenheit or less. Reference: Section701.7, IPC 2012. 4. Clarify why the proposed 2-compartment sink does not discharge indirectly to the grease waste system. Reference: Section 802.1.8, IPC 2012. 5. Show all of the kitchen plumbing fixtures (e.g. hand sinks, prep sinks, etc.) and their relation to the grease waste system. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 6. Explain the note, "2" (E) GREASE INTERCEPTOR (500LB)". Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 7. Clarify the nature of the relocated water heater; is it gas-fired or electric? No circuits note its installation. Provide a detail of the water heater installation, including the excess pressure relief, expansion tank, vacuum relief or other anti-siphon device, safety pan, and valves. Reference: Sections 503, 504, 606.1, 607.2, and 607.3, IPC 2012 and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 12/22/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/19/2018 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 01/19/2018 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/19/2018 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |