Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T17CM08351
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/19/2018 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/28/2018 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Previous Comment 1; Sheet C1; Index of Drawings: The distances from the building to site property lines and to adjacent buildings were not indicated on Sheet C1 or the Site Plan Sheet DP2 as requested. 2. Previous Comment 13; Sheet A3; Stair Section b: The vertical dimensions from the first floor to the stair landing and from the stair landing to the second floor do not appear to be correct. Please verify. 3. Previous Comment 26; Structural Calculations: There were no structural calculations received with this submittal. Please provide, including the requested lateral calculations. 4. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 03/29/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Coordinate the assembly descriptions of the COMcheck envelope compliance certificate with the drawings. See section B/A13, the "Exterior Envelope Energy Compliance Values" note on A2, and the IECC compliance notes on sheet M2. Based on section B/A13, there is no continuous insulation in the addition. [Initial comment: Demonstrate energy code compliance for the addition to the building envelope using calculations based on the current code. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, C103.2, C303, and C401.2.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 2. Provide the documentation for the performance of the fenestration products (see footnote b of the assembly descriptions of the COMcheck envelope compliance certificate). [Initial comment: Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3 (3), IECC 2012. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012]. 3. Show the size, route, and termination point for each condensate drain. [Initial comment: Condensate drains shall be terminated at an approved disposal location. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 4. Provide the air balancing data for HP-2. Clarify the submitted ventilation calculations. Provide justification for adding a 25% safety factor to the cooling load calculations considering that the calculations already included a 15% safety factor (page 1 of 3) and the manufacturer shows only a 6% capacity decrease in the total cooling capacity when the unit operates at the Tucson design conditions. [Initial comment: Provide air-balancing data for HP-2 (supply air and outside air) and for HP-1 (outside air). Reference: Sections 403.1 and 403.2, IMC 2012.] |
| 03/29/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Clarify the termination of the roof drains in the southwest corner of the addition (i.e. where does the 16"-square drain box discharge?). Revise the discharge point of the primary roof drain located at the northwest corner of the addition. Section 7-01.4.1 (E) of the COT Unified Development Code (Technical Standards Manual) states, "Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges of up to and including a ten-year frequency flood event. Drainage flowing across all pedestrian circulation paths shall be conveyed under the path for up to and including the ten-year frequency flood events, except at street intersections, pedestrian crossings, and PAAL pedestrian crossings." As an emergency drain, the overflow roof drain is not subject to this requirement (see Section 1108.2, IPC 2012). [Initial comment: Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. Reference: section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |
| 04/05/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T17CM08351 - Office Building Expansion Building Plans (2nd Review) 3901 E Broadway Blvd. - C-1 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 5, 2018 DUE DATE: April 16, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the current version of the (unapproved) development package DP17-0264. While the building footprint is consistent with the current version of the DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Use, Building footprint, Height, Building square footage, Site conditions etc) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the Commercial Plans reviewers have approved the building plans and the Development Package has been fully approved by PDSD. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. (Include as reference a copy of the most current or the approved and PDSD stamped version of the DP with the next building submittal.) 3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning. 4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: building plans and current or approved version of the DP as reference. |
| 04/16/2018 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |