Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T17CM08351
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/16/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Code review checklist indicates no sprinklers. Our records indicate a sprinkler system was installed. Please verify one way or the other. |
| 11/17/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T17CM08351 1. Sheet C1; Index of Drawings: The index indicates Sheets DP1 and DP2 are included in this submittal. Please provide. Indicate on the site plan the distance from this building to site property lines and to adjacent buildings. Indicate those distances on the Sheet C1 Code Review. 2. Sheet C1; Code Review (Fire Resistive Requirements): The entry for 'Roof Construction' indicates '0 hour existing'. This is a new roof. Please clarify. 3. Sheet C1; Code Review (Fire Resistive Requirements): The entry for 'Floor Construction' indicates 'N/A'. It is applicable. Please indicate the fire resistance rating required. 4. Sheet C1 (Code Review); Sheet A2 (Floor Plan): The Code Review (Fire Resistive Requirements) entry for 'Shaft Enclosures' indicates 'N/A'. The floor plan on Sheet A2 indicates a duct chase at the west side of the floor plan (south of stair 101). Is this shaft being utilized for new ductwork related to this project? The IBC Section 713 does require a fire resistance rating for shaft enclosures. Please clarify and revise the drawings as required. 5. Sheet C1; Code Review (Sprinklers): The Code Review entry for 'Sprinklers' indicates 'Not required-provided'. The Code Review entry for 'Allowable Area Calculations' indicates "Sprinklers-No'. Please clarify. 6. Sheet C1; Code Review: Please include an analysis for the required number of plumbing fixtures (water closets, lavatories, drinking fountains, service sinks) for this new space. 7. Sheet D1 (Demolition Keynote 8); Sheet A1 (Lower Level Floor Plan): A plan note at the southeast corner indicates the 'covered existing parking structure to remain'. Please add a reference to that keynote on Sheet D1 at that location. 8. Sheet A1 (Lower Level Floor Plan); Sheets A8 and A9 (Column Schedule): The architectural plan indicates 3-5 ½" x 8" steel columns, while the structural sheets indicate 6" x 8" steel columns. Please coordinate. 9. Sheet A1; Lower Level Floor Plan: Is the new interior stair (at the west wall) being considered as an exit for the second floor (per the Code Review on Sheet C1)? Please verify the stair meets the requirements of the IBC Sections 1022.1 (direct exit to the exterior or an exit passageway), Section 1022.2 (enclosure construction), Section 1022.3 (stair termination), Section 1022.4 (openings), Section 1022.5 (penetrations), Section 1022.6 (ventilation), 1022.7 (exterior walls), and Section 1022.8 (discharge identification). 10. Sheet A1; Lower Level Floor Plan: If the new interior stair (at the west wall) is not considered an exit, revise the Code Review on Sheet C1 and verify the maximum exit access travel distance from Table 1021.2(2) is not exceeded. See Section 1016.3.1 for that measurement at exit access stairways. 11. Sheet A2; Upper Level Floor Plan: Please verify on the drawings the exterior exit stairway (at the north wall) does not require separation from the interior of the building per the IBC Section 1026.6. 12. Sheet A2; Column Facing Details A and B: Will this condition be acceptable with a 6" wide steel column (per Sheet A8)? Please verify. 13. Sheet A3; Stair Section b: Please indicate on this section the vertical dimension from the lower stair landing to the finished second floor. 14. Sheet A3; Door Schedule: Please provide all missing door hardware types in this schedule. 15. Sheet A3; Door Hardware Schedule: Please add verbiage for door locks and latches on this sheet per the requirements of the IBC Section 1008.1.9.3. 16. Sheet A8; Design Criteria: The structural design criteria indicates a floor live load of 40 psf. Per the IBC Table 1607.1, the 'Office Buildings' section indicates a minimum 50 psf uniform live load for offices and 80 psf uniform live load for corridors above the first floor. Please verify the design live load used for the floor framing, and verify framing indicated is adequate. 17. Sheet A8; Floor Framing Plan: Detail 19/A10 is cut on the north wall. Please revise the detail sheet reference. 18. Sheet A8; Floor Framing Plan: A bottom of beam reference on the north wall (at B1) is incomplete. Please revise. 19. Sheets A8 and A9; Header Schedule: Please verify the header spans indicated in the schedule. 20. Sheet A9 (Roof Framing Plan); Structural Calculations: The beam denoted as B7 in the calculations (5 1/8"x12" GLB) is calculated as 20'-0" length, while the B7 on the plan (also a 5 1/8"x12" GLB) indicates 34'-5" in the Beam Schedule. Please clarify. 21. Sheets A10 and A11: Several details indicate rated wall, floor, and ceiling assemblies. Please include the UL Rating numbers for all of those assemblies. Are all of the assemblies indicating fire resistance ratings required? Sheet C1 indicated there were no fire resistive requirements (in the Code Review). Please verify and revise as required. 22. Sheet G1; General Structural Notes: Please add a section of notes for masonry. 23. Sheet G1; General Structural Notes (Special Inspections): Note 3A indicates 'Structural Masonry: Not Used'. Please revise. 24. Sheet G1; General Structural Notes (Foundations): Note 3 indicates the necessity of hiring a registered soils engineer to test and inspect to ensure requirements of the soils report are met. There is no soils report for this project. Is a registered soils engineer required? Please verify. 25. Sheet G1; General Structural Notes (Structural Steel): Note 3 indicates bolts shall be A307 or A325N per details. No details were located indicating bolt grades. Please clarify. 26. Structural Calculations: Please provide lateral calculations for this project. 27. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 11/17/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/20/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Verify that the specified metering faucet for the lavatory will dispense a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle and that cycle will last for at least 10-seconds. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-09. 2. Provide tempered water for the public restroom lavatories using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012. 3. Revise the design criteria for the water distribution system to account for the actual static lift to the highest fixture. Reference: Section 604.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 4. For the use of PEX tubing, provide a sizing chart showing the correct size of PEX tubing to be used as a substitute for the CPVC pipe shown on the drawings. Reference: Sections 303.2 and 604.3, IPC 2012. 5. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. Reference: section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 6. Explain the meaning of the term, "tailpiece vent." Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 7. Provide the civil plans referenced on sheet P3. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012 |
| 11/21/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the addition to the building envelope using calculations based on the current code. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, C103.2, C303, and C401.2.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factor and the SHGC values on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3 (3), IECC 2012. Reference: Section C303.1.3, IECC 2012. 3. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the HVAC system serving the building addition using calculations based on the current code. Reference: Sections C101.4.3, C101.5, C103.2, and C403, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 4. Show that each rooftop unit has a thermostatic control that provides for off-hour and set-back control, automatic shutdown and automatic start-up control (i.e. the thermostat is capable of automatically adjusting the start time of the HVAC equipment in order to bring the interior conditions to the desired temperature at the start of occupancy) and, if the thermostat does not require manual changeover from the heating and cooling modes, it restricts set point overlap. Reference: Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012. 5. Condensate drains shall be terminated at an approved disposal location. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 6. Provide air-balancing data for HP-2 (supply air and outside air) and for HP-1 (outside air). Reference: Sections 403.1 and 403.2, IMC 2012. 7. Revise the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fans so that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted (i.e. all of the air supplied to each restroom is to be exhausted during the hours of operation even if the lights are off). Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012 |
| 12/01/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. Provide for illumination and a maintenance receptacle for the air handler installed above the ceiling. 2011 NEC 210.63, 210.70.C. |
| 12/13/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T17CM08351 - Office Building Expansion Building Plans (1st Review) 3901 E Broadway Blvd. - C-1 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 13, 2017 DUE DATE: December 14, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans for compliance with the current version of the (unapproved) development package DP17-0264. While the building footprint is consistent with the current version of the DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Use, Building footprint, Height, Building square footage, Site conditions etc) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the Commercial Plans reviewers have approved the building plans and the Development Package has been fully approved by PDSD. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. (Include as reference a copy of the most current or the approved and PDSD stamped version of the DP with the next building submittal.) 3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning. 4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: building plans and current or approved version of the DP as reference. |
| 12/14/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/05/2018 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 02/05/2018 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/05/2018 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |