Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T17CM07603
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The building and wall sections do not appear to show a continuous insulation layer with an R-4 thermal resistance. Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing. Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. The service bays are conditioned; include them in the COMcheck energy analysis. Reference: Sections C101.5.2 and C401.2, IECC 2012. |
| 10/10/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 10/10/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Coordinate the water heater mounting shelf designs (details 19/A.1.3 and 3/P2.0) using the actual the building structure and appliance weight. Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2012. 2. Provide an approved vacuum relief valve for the scheduled bottom-fed water heater located above the fixture outlets. Reference: Section 504.2, IPC 2012. 3. Termination of the excess pressure relief from the water heater over an elevated service sink (P5) is not an approved location. Reference: Section 504.6 (6), IPC 2012. 4. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2332.83') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2333.00'). Provide a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 10/19/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet A.1.0; Partition Details 1 and 2: In Keynote 5, please indicate the size and quantity of connectors for the brace to the top of the partition and to the structure above. 2. Sheet A.1.0; Partition Details 1 and 2: In Keynote 9, indicate the size of the blocking and how it is connected to the roof structure. 3. Sheet A.1.1; Enlarged Floor Plan: The Sales/Service counter (Reception) has a counter height of 3'-6" as indicated on 6D/A.1.1 and 6E/A.1.1. Per the ICC/ANSI Section 904, the maximum height of the counter above the finished floor is 36". Please revise as required. 4. Sheet A.1.1; Enlarged Floor Plan: The Break Room sink area has a counter height of 3'-0" as indicated on 6B/A.1.1. Per the IBC Section 1109.3, sinks in accessible spaces shall be accessible. Per the ICC/ANSI Section 902.4, the counter/sink height shall be 28" minimum and 34" maximum above finished floor. Please revise as required. 5. Sheet A.1.1; Drinking Fountain Detail: Please add on this drawing a detail for the high/low drinking fountain located in the Lobby. 6. Sheet A.2.0; Details 2 and 3: Note 1 indicates a metal stud suspended from the structure. Please extend these details to the roof and indicate how the metal studs are supported at the roof structure. 7. Sheet A.3.0; Detail 1: The detail indicates a fire rated masonry control joint. Do we have any fire resistance rated walls that this detail is pertinent to? Please verify. 8. Sheet A.5.0; Detail 1 (Note 8): Please indicate the steel angle size in the note. 9. Sheet A.5.0; Detail 1 (Note 9): Please indicate the expansion bolt size and minimum embedment into the concrete, along with the steel angle size. 10. Sheet S2.1 (Roof Framing Plan); Structural Calculations: The calculations for the roof joists J1 (as indicated on Sheet S2.1) were not located. Please verify. 11. Sheet S3.0; Detail 104: This detail does not include the trench drain as indicated in Detail 105. Please include the trench drain in Detail 104, and how it affects the footing in that detail. 12. Sheet S3.0 (Details 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 108, and 109); Sheet S1.0 (General Structural Notes-Foundations): Note 1 indicates a 2500 PSF allowable soil bearing value at 2'-0" below lowest adjacent finished grade, but none of the footing details reference a minimum depth. Please provide on the details. 13. Sheet S3.0; Detail 105: Note 7 indicates 1-#4 horizontal continuous, while two reinforcing bars are indicated. Please clarify. 14. Sheet S4.0; Detail 204: Note 3 references Detail 12 for a masonry control joint. Please revise the reference. 15. Sheet S4.0; Detail 207: Are the metal awnings to be designed by others? No structural calculations were found that relate to the awnings. However, they are not listed under Deferred Submittals on Sheet S1.2. Please clarify. 16. Sheet S4.0; Detail 207: If the metal awnings are to be designed by Schneider Structural Engineers, please provide all calculations, and indicate member sizes on the plans (Sheet S2.1) or Detail 207. 17. Sheet S4.0; Detail 202: Note 5 does not indicate the steel plate spacing. Please provide. 18. Structural Calculations; Pages 40 and 41: The joists J2 in the calculations use a 1200S162-97 at 24" o.c.with a uniform dead load and live load on page 40, but use a 1000S162-68 with a 200 pound point load on page 41. The plans indicate a 1000S162-68 joist at 24" o.c. Please clarify. 19. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 10/30/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/02/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: Brake Masters - 1714 W. Speedway Blvd T17CM07603 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 1, 2017 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Until development package Dp17-0225 is approved the building plans cannot approve. Zoning will review the building plans for compliance with the development package on the next submittal. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 11/06/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP must be approved first. Lowest floor and building drainage must match DP. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/13/2018 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |