Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T17CM07499
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/06/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Clarify the status of the heat pumps shown on sheet M1.0. If they are to be installed as part of the shell construction, provide calculations to show that the building complies with the requirements of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code for new buildings. Reference: Section C401.2, IECC 2012. |
| 10/06/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Recalculate roof areas and revise the roof drain calculations to include the effect of any vertical walls that can divert rainfall onto the roof. Reference: Section 1106.4, IPC 2012. 2. The roof drainage notes on sheet A3.0 refer to scuppers but there are no scuppers on the roof. No scuppers are required if you are using roof drains and secondary (overflow) roof drains. Detail 2/A3.0 and keynote 3 call for 12" roof drains; coordinate the detail with the calculations or increase the size of the rainwater leaders. (Or see the design on sheet P1.0) Reference: Section 1101.5, IPC 2012. 3. Both the primary and the secondary rainwater conductors terminate at the sidewalk curb. How will you differentiate the primary from the secondary flows? (See sheet P1.0; it shows a different termination.) Reference: Section 1108.2, IPC 2012. 4. Provide the civil utility drawings referenced on sheet P1.0 that show the construction of the building sewer and the water service to the building. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 10/06/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 10/10/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/17/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet TS1: Include on the drawing the allowable height and area calculations. Include adjacent building. Reference IBC Ch. 5 2. Sheet TS1: Review and verify compliance with IBC Table 602. If provisions of IBC Section 503 are being utilized, please provide sufficient information to verify compliance and include reference on the drawings. 3. Sheet A1.0: Door 106 reduces the required egress width of the corridor by more than one half. Reference IBC Section 1005. 4. Sheet A1.0 Keynotes 8 & 19: Both notes specify gypsum board on the "inside only". Is this the inside of the shell space or inside of the corridor? Please clarify. 5. Sheet A1.0 Keynote 15: Verify wall denoted complies with IBC Table 602. Reference Comment 1 & 2. 6. Sheet A1.0 Keynote 11: Keynote 11 could not be located on the drawing. Verify 7. Sheet A1.0 Keynote 21: Keynote 21 is denoted on the drawings in multiple locations. Verify and coordinate with the Fire Department to determine desired location. 8. Sheet A2.0 East Elevation: Detail 11/A6.0 EIFS wall system is denoted where the new wall abuts the existing wall but the new wall is identified by Keynote 15 as metal studs with only plywood. Verify and coordinate. 9. Sheet A3.0 Keynotes: Overlapping text at Keynotes. Please revise. 10. Sheet A3.0 Roof Plan: In the NW corner of the building near the curved awning, Details 1/A6.1 & 3/A6.1 are denoted. Verify and revise as necessary. 11. Sheet A3.0 Roof drain calculations: Roof drain calculation for the North and South scuppers indicate an area of 2,445 + 4,395 = 6,840 square feet but the building area is denoted as 6,240 square feet on Sheet TS1. Verify and coordinate. 12. Sheet A3.0 Roof Plan: On North end of patio canopy there is a note "T.O. Parapet". Should this be T.O. Canopy? Verify and revise. 13. Sheet A4.1; Wall Section 1: Verify Details 2/A6.0 and 3/A6.0 are correctly denoted. Revise as necessary. 14. Sheet A4.1; Wall Section 3: Verify Detail Callout 4/S1.1 is correctly located on the section drawing. 15. Sheet A4.2; Wall Section 6: Detail 2/A6.0 is denoted on the section drawing. Verify correct detail is denoted. 16. Sheet A4.3; Wall Section 9: The T.O. Window Height is denoted as 0'-0" as is the T.O. Slab. Please revise to indicate the T.O. Window Height. 17. Structural Calculations: There were 2 separate sets of structural calculations submitted, one included the registrant's seal and one did not. Please provide calculations which include the registrant's seal. 18. Structural Calculations: Please include Keyplans for foundation, beams, columns. 19. Structural Calculations: Please include a complete Lateral Analysis. 20. Sheet S1.1; Detail 4: H2.5 tie denoted in the detail is a discontinued item. Revise to reference a currently available product. 21. Sheet S2.0: Near the SE corner of the building there is overlapping text. Please revise. 22. Sheet S3.0: Verify concrete strengths specified are correctly denoted. 23. Sheet S3.0: Please denote all required special inspections. Reference IBC Ch. 17. 24. Include a Special Inspection Certificate for all required special inspections. 25. General: Provide written responses to all comments. |
| 10/27/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/31/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T17CM07499 - Shell Building Only Building Plans (1st Review) 5590 E River Road TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 31, 2017 DUE DATE: November 2, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. The development package related to this development has not been approved and will require an additional plan review. However, zoning did do a comparison review with the current version of the DP with the building plans as it relates to the zoning review purview, which includes the building square footage, building height, building footprint, and location on the site. While the building footprint and the site revisions are consistent with the approved DP as it relates to the zoning review purview (Building footprint, Height, square footage, site conditions etc) zoning cannot approve the building plans until the Commercial Plans reviewers have approved the building plans. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. (Include a copy of the most current or the approved and PDSD stamped version of the DP with the next building submittal.) 3. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. 4. COMMENT: Zoning is requesting a clarification on the square footage information. Clarify if the square footage listed on the DP and the cover sheet of the building plans is based on the inside dimensions. For zoning review, the square footage of the building is measured from the outside face of the building walls. Based on the dimensions on the floor plan sheet, the square footage appears to be 6,597 square feet and the square footage listed on both the DP and building plans is listed as 6,240 square feet. If the interior space has been used, the building square footage on the DP will have to be revised and any calculations using the building square footage will also have to be revised. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised Building Plans |
| 11/03/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP Must be approved first |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/09/2017 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |