Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T17CM06751
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/12/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/13/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/15/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet T1.0; Code Analysis (Occupant Load): The occupant load is calculated using 732 SF office, 6786 SF recreational, and 596 SF assembly. Please break this analysis down to indicate the square footage per Sheet A1.0 floor plan and mezzanine plan, and corresponding occupant load for each occupancy type using those square footage values (see Section 1004.1.1.2 for mezzanine occupant load). 2. Sheet T1.0; Code Analysis (Occupancy Classification): The drawings indicate a business (B) occupancy classification, and base the allowable square footage on that use (Table 503). The minimum plumbing fixtures required indicate an occupancy classification of gymnasium (A-3) per Table 2902.1. The plan on Sheet A1.0 indicates this is primarily a gymnasium. A single occupancy classification must be used for this project, then the allowable square footage and plumbing fixtures will be based on that use. Please revise the occupancy classification, allowable area, and plumbing fixtures as required. 3. Sheet T1.0; Code Analysis (Egress): Please include an analysis on the drawings for the required egress width at the stair from the second floor using the IBC Section 1005.3.1. 4. Sheet D1.0; Plan Keynotes: Note 9 indicates 'not used', but is located in the parking lot on the southwest corner of the building. Please coordinate. 5. Sheet A1.0; Second Floor Plan: The IBC Section 505.2.3 indicates a mezzanine shall be open to the room in which it is located. There are five exceptions to this requirement. Please indicate on the drawings how this mezzanine meets the code requirements. 6. Sheet A1.0; First Floor Plan: Please darken the lines defining the existing walls of this building. 7. Sheet A1.0; First Floor Plan: In Room 101, there is a symbol at the west wall indicated by 1. Is this a window designation? Please clarify on the plan. 8. Sheet A1.0; Floor Plan Keynotes: Note 6 was not located on the plan. Please verify. 9. Sheet A1.0; Floor Plan Keynotes: Note 8 indicates a 36" high guardrail at the mezzanine. Per the IBC Section 1013.3, the required guardrail height is 42". Please verify. 10. Sheet A1.0; Floor Plan Keynotes: Note 15 indicates 'not used', but is located near the south entry. Please coordinate. 11. Sheet A1.0; Floor Plan Keynotes: Note 14 indicates column sizes that do not match the structural Sheet S1.1. Please coordinate. 12. Sheet A1.0; Floor Plan Keynotes: In note 16, please add the sheet reference for the wall schedule. 13. Sheet A1.0 (First Floor Plan); Wall Types: Along Grid Line G, a wall type WT7 is indicated, but that wall type is not noted with the wall types on Sheet A1.0 (it is indicated on Sheet A4.1). Please clarify. 14. Sheet A1.1; Enlarged Restroom Plan: Please indicate on the plan the accessible bench in the men's locker room, and reference a detail for that bench (could use women's accessible bench detail on Sheet A1.1). 15. Sheets A1.1 and A1.2: Please add details on these sheets as required for shower compartment per the ICC/ANSI Section 608. Include seats, controls, grab bars, etc. 16. Sheet A2.0; Roof Plan Keynotes: Notes 2, 10, 11, and 14 were not located on the plan. Please verify. 17. Sheet A2.0; Roof Plan Keynotes: Please finish note 5 by adding the reference. 18. Sheet A2.0; Roof Plan Keynotes: Please verify the reference sheet indicated in note 11. 19. Sheet A2.0; Roof Plan Keynotes: Note 13 indicates a roof hatch detail. This detail was not located on the drawings. Please verify. 20. Sheet A2.1; Reflected Ceiling Plan Keynotes: Note 4 was not located on the plans. Please verify. 21. Sheet A3.0; West Elevation: Please indicate the grid lines on this elevation. 22. Sheets A3.1, A3.2, and A3.3; Building Section Keynotes: Note 6 was not located on the sections. Please verify. 23. Sheet A3.4; Section 1: The detail reference 410/S4.1 is not correct. Please revise. 24. Sheet A4.0; Door Schedule: Door 107 indicates EEH-2 operator hardware in the schedule. Operator EEH-2 indicates this is for a single door, while the schedule/floor plan indicate a double door. Please clarify. 25. Sheet S0.1; General Structural Notes: The foundation notes indicate a geotechnical report was used for the footing design. Please provide one copy of that report for review. 26. Sheet S0.3; Detail 012: Please provide structural calculations for the light pole foundation. 27. Sheet S1.1; Foundation Plan: At Grid Lines D and 1, an existing footing is indicated (see Plan Note 1). Is this footing 4'-0" x 8'-4" x 2'-0" thick like the other two footings in this wall? Please indicate on the plan. 28. Sheets S1.1, S2.1, and S2.2; Plans: Please indicate a north arrow on all plans. 29. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 09/15/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the energy code analysis for the building envelope, coordinating the building components used in the analysis with those shown on the drawing (e.g. on the plans, the roof does not show a layer of continuous insulation). Reference: Section C303.1, IECC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 2. Revise the heat gain calculations for HP-8 and HP-10 using the outside air flowrates determined per Section 403.3, IMC 2012 and reassess the required cooling capacities of the units. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012. 3. Show the location of HP-5 on the roof plan. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 4. Room 108 has two 8-foot diameter ceiling fans. Show that the relative locations of the supply air diffusers in the room are in accordance with the conditions of the fan manufacturer's installation requirements. Reference: Section 304.1, IMC 2012. |
| 09/15/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The plans and the water isometric do not show a recirculating hot water system. Coordinate the water heater detail (and the plumbing specifications) with the plans and the water isometric. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Provide roof drainage and hydraulic scupper size calculations based on the 100-year hourly rainfall rate for Tucson, 3" per hour. Consider each portion of the roof (i.e. roof areas separated by crickets or parapets) separately. Reference: Sections 1106.1, 1106.4, and 1108.3, IPC 2012; Section 1611.1, IBC 2012. 3. Verify the areas of the vertical walls used in the roof area calculations. Reference: Section 1106.4, IPC 2012. 4. The minimum dimension for a scupper is 4". Reference: Section 1108.3, IPC 2012. |
| 09/29/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. Ref: Plan Sheet E5.0. Provide for a complete Grounding Electrode System for the Electrical Service and building, as required per 2011 NEC art 250. #2. Ref: Plan Sheet E3.0. All receptacles in the restrooms are required to be GFI protected. The locker area is not isolated from the restroom areas, therefore the receptacles in this area should also be GFI protected to prevent the possibility of electric shock to personal as there is a potential for wet people in the area. NEC art 210.8B1, B7. #3. Ref: Plan Sheet E 3.0, E5.0. The power plan E3.0 shows panels 'C' and 'D' as existing, and the House panel as New, and the One Line Diagram shows 'C' and 'D' them as new, and the House panel as existing. Please clarify this on the plans. Ref: 2012 IBC 107.2.1, 2011 NEC. |
| 10/04/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: 4490 N. 1st Avenue T17CM06751 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 04 2017 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Until all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 10/06/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/11/2017 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 10/11/2017 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/11/2017 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |