Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T17CM06734
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/05/2017 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Unable to determine fire rating of doors and exit hardware where panic hardware is required. Not listed on door hardware schedule. Please add sprinklers and alarms to deffered submittals. |
| 09/05/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Coordinate the size of the proposed water meter; the civil drawings call for a 2" meter but the plumbing drawings call for a 1-1/2" meter. |
| 09/06/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide gas service to AC-1. Reference: Section 402.1, IFGC 2012. 2. Revise the Plumbing General Notes to show the codes that the City of Tucson has currently adopted and complete the note regarding the need for a backwater valve. 3. Coordinate the waste and vent isometric, 9/P2.1, with the floor plan 3/P1.1 for pipe sizes and location of cleanouts. Is it your intention to utilize the water closet as a cleanout for the 4" horizontal drain? Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 4. Clarify the proposed use of the floor sink (EQ 35) located in the paint area and explain why it requires 110-volt power. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 5. Include the continuous supply water demand (e.g. the evaporative coolers and the pressure washer) when determining the total water demand for the building. 6. Clarify how the trench drains and catch basins are connected to the sand/oil separator. Reference: Section 1003.1, IPC 2012. 7. Provide the gutter slopes and sizing information for the gutters and downspouts. Reference: Sections 1106.1 and 1106.6, IPC 2012. |
| 09/07/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Demonstrate energy code compliance for the building envelope using calculations based on the current code. Reference: Sections C101.3, C101.5, C103.2, C303, and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. As noted in the COMcheck Mechanical Compliance Certificate, the reduced indoor lighting power option was selected as the additional efficiency package requirement to comply with Section C406, IECC 2012. The lighting plans however do not show compliance with the requirements of Section C406, IECC 2012. Coordinate the compliance with the additional efficiency package options. Reference: Section C401.2, IECC 2012. 3. Verify that the placement of the drum louvers for the evaporative coolers EC-4 and EC-5 comply with the clearances required by the manufacturer of the ceiling fan. Reference: Section 304.1, IMC 2012. 4. Provide ventilation for the storage room (107). Reference: Section 401.2, IMC 2012. 5. Verify that sufficient additional outside air is being supplied to the break/conference room to transfer the required ventilation for the janitor room (104). Reference: Section403.2.2, IMC 2012. 6. The occupant load used for calculating the minimum required ventilation (e.g. the break/conference room) is to be based on Table 403.3, IMC 2012 or an approved engineering analysis of the specific occupancy type. (Note: the architect shows this room with an area of 324 square feet, not the 175 square feet that is shown in the ventilation calculations. Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2012. 7. Coordinate the balancing data for AC-1 as shown on the mechanical plan (M1.1) with the scheduled airflow for the unit (1450 CFM vs. 1200 CFM). Reference: section 107.2.1, IBC 2012 and Sections 304.1 and 403.7, IMC 2012. |
| 09/07/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet G1.2 Code Analysis: Gross Building Area for F-1 area is denoted as 10,009 sq. ft. but when welding, wash, paint and shop areas are added the total is 13,615 sq. ft. (4,143+3,707+1,947+3818=13,615). Verify 2. Sheet G1.2 Code Analysis: Gross Building Area for overhangs is denoted as 13,362 sq. ft. but when areas are added the total is 9,023 sq. ft. (2,175+6,848=9,023). Verify 3. Sheet G1.2: Outdoor work area 208 shall be assigned an occupant load. Considering this area contains storage, an occupant load factor of 1/300 Gross would be acceptable. Reference IBC 1004.5 4. Sheet G1.2: Wash area 203 shall be assigned an occupant load and included in the total number of occupants of the F-1 area. 5. Sheet G1.2 Code Analysis Plan: Pain Booth area exiting is denoted at the overhead door. Should this be at the adjacent side hinged door. Verify 6. Sheet A1.1: Detail callout between gridline A1 & A2 is blank. Verify 7. Sheet A7.0 Elevation 4: Verify correct location of water closet. 8. Sheet A7.0: At lockers near Gridline H there is an elevation callout that is blank. Verify 9. Sheet A8.0 Storefront Types: Section callout at Storefront 05 is blank. Verify 10. Sheet A8.0 Administration Door Schedule: Please include Head & Jamb Details and Hardware schedule. 11. Sheet S1.0 Epoxy Bolts or Dowels: Hilti HIT RE 500 SD Report 2322 is no longer valid. Please reference a current report. 12. Sheet S1.2: Please provide a Special Inspection Certificate for all required special inspection denoted. 13. Sheet S3.0 Keynote 15 of details 104, 105, 113 and Keynote 3 of detail 112: Pleae denote the size of ties. 14. General: Provide written responses to all comments. |
| 09/25/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/26/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: Los Reales Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 26, 2017 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Until development package DP17-0144 is approved Zoning cannot approve the building plans. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 09/26/2017 | SSHIELD1 | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Until development package DP17-0144 is approved Engineering cannot approve the building plans. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/20/2018 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |