Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

PRO is currently experiencing an outage. Some documents and records may not be available on PRO momentarily. We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to restore full access.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T17CM06296
Parcel: 14042072B

Address:
7060 S TUCSON BL

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG

Permit Number - T17CM06296
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - BLDG/FIRE/ZONING/ENG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/17/2017 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
09/07/2017 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Sheets PV0.0 through PV1.3: Per the IBC Section 107.1, construction documents shall be prepared by a registered design professional. These drawings have not been sealed. Please verify.
2. Drawing v18110.01 (Sheet 1); Schletter Submittal: The foundation notes indicate a geotechnical report was used for this project. Please provide one copy of that report for review.
3. Drawing v18110.01 (Sheets 1 through 3); Schletter Submittal: Please add a note on these sheets that references the ground mount arrays (G1 through G7) as indicated on Sheets PV0.0 and PV1.0.
4. Drawing v18110.01 (Sheet 2); Structural Calculations (Page 8): The estimated anchoring depth of the post is listed as 81.1" in the calculations, while the drawing (Section A-A) indicates 63 3/4". Please clarify.
5. Drawing v18110.01 (Sheet 3); Structural Calculations (Page 5): The purlin section indicated in the calculations does not dimensionally match the purlin section on Sheet 3. Please verify.
6. Drawing v18110.01 (Sheet 3); Structural Calculations (Page 7): Is the member shown in the calculations (crossbar) indicated on the drawings? Please verify.
7. Drawing v18110.02 (Sheet 1); Schletter Submittal: The foundation notes indicate a geotechnical report was used for this project. Please provide one copy of that report for review.
8. Drawing v18110.02 (Sheets 1 through 3); Schletter Submittal: Please add a note on these sheets that references the ground mount arrays (G1 through G7) as indicated on Sheets PV0.0 and PV1.0.
9. Drawing v18110.02 (Sheet 2); Structural Calculations (Page 8): The estimated anchoring depth of the post is listed as 81.1" in the calculations, while the drawing (Section A-A) indicates 63 3/4". Please clarify.
10. Drawing v18110.02 (Sheet 3); Structural Calculations (Page 5): The purlin section indicated in the calculations does not dimensionally match the purlin section on Sheet 3. Please verify.
11. Drawing v18110.02 (Sheet 3); Structural Calculations (Page 7): Is the member shown in the calculations (crossbar) indicated on the drawings? Please verify.
12. Drawing v18110.03 (Sheet 1); Schletter Submittal: The foundation notes indicate a geotechnical report was used for this project. Please provide one copy of that report for review.
13. Drawing v18110.03 (Sheets 1 through 3); Schletter Submittal: Please add a note on these sheets that references the ground mount arrays (G1 through G7) as indicated on Sheets PV0.0 and PV1.0.
14. Drawing v18110.03 (Sheet 2); Structural Calculations (Page 8): The estimated anchoring depth of the post is listed as 81.1" in the calculations, while the drawing (Section A-A) indicates 63 3/4". Please clarify.
15. Drawing v18110.03 (Sheet 3); Structural Calculations (Page 5): The purlin section indicated in the calculations does not dimensionally match the purlin section on Sheet 3. Please verify.
16. Drawing v18110.03 (Sheet 3); Structural Calculations (Page 7): Is the member shown in the calculations (crossbar) indicated on the drawings? Please verify.
17. Sheet S2.0; Panels P1, P2, and P4: A section through the panels references Sheet S2.2. It appears Sheet S2.2 is incorrectly identified as S2.0. Please verify.
18. Sheet S2.0; Plan Keynotes: Note 1 references Detail 205A for the bridging. Detail 205 (on Sheet S4.0) does not indicate a Detail 205A. Please verify.
19. Sheet S2.0; Footing (F) Schedule: The F2 footing should have 8-#6 longitudinal bars per the structural calculations. Please verify.
20. Sheet S2.1; Panel P3: A section through the panel references Sheet S2.2. It appears Sheet S2.2 is incorrectly identified as S2.0. Please verify.
21. Sheet S2.1: Should the drilled pier (30" option) schedule and the footing (F) schedule be included on this sheet? Please verify.
22. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments.
09/14/2017 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response.
#1. Provide for a field evaluation after the supply side taps are performed for the PV interconnection to the service equipment, to maintain equipment listings. NEC art, 230.66.
#2. Provide for the installation of grounding electrodes at the transformers. As required per NEC art, 250.30A4.
Ref: 2012 IBC sec, 107.2.1, 2011 NEC.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/20/2017 ARUIZ1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed