Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T17CM03530
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/25/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | From sheet A1.0, unable to locate door 105C on door schedule page. Please include fire sprinklers, fire sprinkler underground, fire alarms, and kitchen exhaust hood fire supression system to list of deferred submittals. |
| 05/30/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: T17CM03530 - New Food Service Use - IHOP Restaurant Building Plans (1st Review) 375 West Blacklidge - O-3 / C-3 Zone TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 30, 2017 DUE DATE: June 16, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. The development package related to this development was not available for comparison with the building plans as it relates to the zoning review purview, which includes the building square footage, building height, building footprint, and location on the site. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. (Include a copy of the most current or the approved and PDSD stamped version of the DP with the next building submittal.) 3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning. 4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: building plans and current or approved version of the DP as reference. |
| 05/30/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PROJECT: T17CM03530 - New Food Service Use - IHOP Restaurant Building Plans (1st Review) 1955 W VALENCIA RD - C-1 Zone TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 30, 2017 DUE DATE: June 16, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. The development package related to this development was not available for comparison with the building plans as it relates to the zoning review purview, which includes the building square footage, building height, building footprint, and location on the site. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage and location to ensure consistency with the DP. (Include a copy of the most current or the approved and PDSD stamped version of the DP with the next building submittal.) 3. COMMENT: If any changes are necessary, due to the PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments that affect or change the building footprint, height, or square footage, the DP will need to be updated prior to approval of the building plans by Zoning. 4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: building plans and current or approved version of the DP as reference. |
| 06/05/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Sheet TS1; Project Code Review: The occupant load calculations for the office should use a factor of 100 SF per occupant. Please revise. 2. Sheet TS1 (Project Code Review); Sheet A1.0 (Seating Schedule): The total occupant load listed on Sheet TS1 is 185. The seating schedule on Sheet A1.0 indicates 190 seats. Please coordinate to total occupant load. 3. Sheet A1.0; Floor Plan: The pocket doors 105A and 105B are located within the means of egress path leading to the exit door (105C). The IBC Section 1008.1.2 requires egress doors to be side hinged swing type, with exceptions. Exception 6 allows horizontal sliding doors to be within the means of egress, but it must comply with the IBC Section 1008.1.4.3. The pocket doors do not comply with those requirements. Please verify and revise. 4. Sheet A1.0 (Floor Plan); Sheet A11.1 (Section 7): Sheet A1.0 (Wall Types) indicates 6" 20 gauge metal studs at 16" o.c. at the hood, while Section 7/A11.1 indicates 6" 18 gauge metal studs at 16" o.c. in the same wall. Please coordinate. 5. Sheet A1.0 (Floor Plan); Sheet A7.0 (Door Schedule): The exit door 105C (on the east side of the building) is not included in the door schedule on Sheet A7.0. Please verify. 6. Sheet A3.0; Reflected Ceiling Plan: Please provide an exit sign for the door in the kitchen since it is considered an exit on Sheet TS1. 7. Sheet A3.0; Reflected Ceiling Plan: The light fixture in the office is shaded, indicating an emergency light L10-EL per the legend. The light fixture indicates L10 in the office, which is only a light fixture. Please coordinate. 8. Sheet A3.0; Reflected Ceiling Plan: Dining areas 1, 2, and 3 are provided with two exit lights on this plan. Please verify the requirements of the IBC Section 1011 are met for exit signage. Coordinate this plan with electrical. 9. Sheet A7.1; Pocket Door Detail: Please verify (per previous comment 3) the pocket doors specified in this detail meet all requirements of the IBC Section 1008.1.4.3. 10. Sheet A9.0; Detail 3: Portions of Detail 3 can not be read. Please revise. 11. Sheet A9.0; Sections: There are two sections identified as Section 3. Please revise. 12. Sheet A9.2; Section 4: The stone veneer note references Detail 3/A9.2. Please revise the reference. 13. Sheet A10.0 (Details 2, 3, and 8); Sheet S3.2 (Detail 14): Please coordinate the wall blocking size and configuration for these details. 14. Sheet A10.0; Detail 6: The awning references Details 2, 3, and 4 on Sheet A11. Please revise the references. 15. Sheet S1.1; Key Notes: Please verify all key notes are indicated on the plan. 16. Sheet S3.1; Detail 14: Please indicate the minimum concrete cover for the tube column at the outside face. In addition, include a dimensioned detail for the position of the column on the base plate (can use the plan above this detail). 17. Sheet S3.1; Details 1, 7, 8, and 10: Please provide dimensions as required. 18. Sheet S3.3; Structural Notes (Carpentry): Note 1f references the 2003 IBC. Please revise the reference. 19. General: Please provide a means of egress plan which clearly identifies all means of egress paths, distances, components, and exit occupant loads. 20. General: Please provide a Special Inspection Certificate for site preparation, reinforced concrete, structural masonry, structural welding, expansion anchors, and epoxy anchors. See Sheet S3.3. 21. General: Please provide one copy of the soils report (as indicated on Sheet S3.3) for review. 22. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 06/06/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Verify the water pressure available to the site. Per Tucson Water, the water pressure range for this address will be approximately 48 to 55 PSI. 2. Provide a site drawing showing the size and route of the building water supply along with the location of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 06/06/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the heating and cooling load calculations, using the exterior design conditions shown in Section 302.2, IECC 2012, as modified by the City of Tucson. Verify that the cooking appliances not located under hoods have been included in the cooling load calculations. 2. Verify the flow rate for EF-6; it is scheduled as 500 CFM on sheets M1.0 and M3.0 but on sheet M4.3 it has a flow rate of 600 CFM. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 3. The partition behind the three Type I hoods has large pass-through openings. Verify that the proposed wall canopy hoods are listed for this application. Reference: Sections 507.1 and 507.13, IMC 2012. 4. Provide structural calculations and details to show that the Type I hoods are supported from the building structure in accordance with Section 507.6, IMC 2012 (the hood hanging weight plus the weight of personnel working in or on the hood). Reference: Section 302.1, IMC 2012. |
| 06/07/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/07/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide a site drawing showing the size, route, and slope of the building sewer and the location of its connection to the public sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Coordinate the gas piping design for the kitchen appliances with the Food Service drawings for both appliance description and gas load. Reference: Sections 402.1 and 402.3, IFGC 2012. 3. The Watts LF7 dual check backflow preventer is listed to ASSE 1024. All beverage dispensers are required to have a dual check backflow preventer with an atmospheric port listed to ASSE 1022 (e.g. Watts SD-3). Reference: Section 608.16.1, IPC 2012. 4. The foodservice equipment schedule shows the dishwasher, K-77, equipped with a booster heater. Verify that the discharge from the dishwasher will be 140 degrees Fahrenheit or less. Reference: Section701.7, IPC 2012. |
| 06/08/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please provide full compliance with the TUCSON/PIMA COUNTY OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE for the exterior lighting. |
| 06/23/2017 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Need for Sewer Connection Fee Application Approval: PCRWRD/IWC/ Steven Valencia review & approval – 520-724-6200. Need PDEQ on-site private sewer approval to construct (C. A.). |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/27/2017 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |