Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T17CM02325
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/29/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please include fire sprinklers and fire alarm (sprinkler monitoring) in the deferred submittal section on sheet G0.0. Please review building reviewer's comments regarding occupancy classification and occupant loads and confirm or revise. |
| 04/10/2017 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Approval of DP17-0052 is required prior to approval of this plan. |
| 04/11/2017 | PIMA COUNTY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ELECTRICAL – COMMERCIAL The Lighting Fixture Schedule on sheet E6.0 indicates that exterior fixture type W1 has a color temperature rating of 5000K. Per City of Tucson/Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code 402.1 the color temperature shall not exceed 3500K. The Lighting Fixture Schedule indicates a 4000K type G fixture; however this fixture does not appear on the Lighting Plan. Ref. OLC 402.1. Provide outdoor lighting lumen calculations for the entire parcel per Outdoor Lighting Code Table 401.1, Lighting Area E2. The photometric plan on sheet E9.1 does not satisfy this requirement. Light fixtures in restrooms, office, janitor closet, electric room, riser room, storage room and IT room shall have occupancy sensors per 2012 IECC C405.2.2.2. Above ceiling wire and cable shall be listed as plenum-rated or shall be installed in conduit. Ref. 2011 NEC 300.22(C) |
| 04/11/2017 | PIMA COUNTY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLUMBING - COMMERCIAL Add a requirement in the Plumbing Fixture Specifications, sheet M9.1, that lavatory faucet shall dispense not more than .25 gallon per metering cycle. Reference City of Tucson amendment to 2012 IPC. |
| 04/11/2017 | PIMA COUNTY | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T17CM02325 - PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Reviewer: Chris Anderson, April 10, 2017 BUILDING – COMMERCIAL In the Code/Project Data on sheet G0.1 this facility is identified as a “business” occupancy. However, as a visitor center this is assumed to be a public building with large reception, conference and “team” room, and is more appropriately classified as A-3, “assembly”. Provide solid reasoning for classifying this facility as a “B” occupancy or revise the occupancy to A-3. Ref. 2012 IBC 303.4. The occupant load in the Code/Project Data indicates 2,069 SF of “business” area at 100 SF per occupant; however 2012 IBC Table 1004.1.2 is based on the function of the space. 100 SF per occupant for the large reception area does not coincide with normal reception area usage. Revise occupancy calculations for this space using 5/7/15 net SF per occupant. Provide a plan showing furniture layout in reception area (if any), circulation space and standing space. Use appropriate SF/occupant for each of these areas. How will the conference and team rooms be used? Will either room ever be used as open standing space or with concentrated chairs instead of tables and chairs? Ref. 2012 IBC Table 1004.1.2. Provide plumbing fixture calculations based on the (revised) occupancy calculations to justify amounts of plumbing fixtures shown on floor plan. Ref. 2012 IBC Table 2902.1. In Deferred Submittals box on sheet G0.0 add “Structural precast concrete design drawings and structural calculations sealed by an Arizona registrant.” Ref. 2012 IBC 107.3.4.1. The column schedule on sheet S3.1 shows column C-4 to be W12x45, and the foundation plan, sheet S1.1 shows the foundation for this column to be a type F5.0. However, the structural calculations, page 3/12, shows the column at column line C-4 as W10x33 and the footing as 4’x4’x1.5’ which is footing type F4.0 on the Footing Schedule, sheet S3.1. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. The column schedule on sheet S3.1 shows column C-1 to be W12x45, and the foundation plan, sheet S1.1 shows the foundation for this column to be a type F5.0. However, the structural calculations, page 3/12, shows the column at column line C-1 as W10x33 and the footing as 4’x4’x1.5’ which is footing type F4.0 on the Footing Schedule, sheet S3.1. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. It is impossible to confirm which column and spread footing design in the structural calculations correspond to columns A-1.8, A3.1, B-2, C-2 and C-3 on the Column Schedule and Foundation Plan. Please clarify by revising the Spread Footing Design ”Footing Column Location” on pages 4-9 of the structural calculations. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. Identify locations for sections 4&5/S4.1 on foundation and framing plans. A dumpster enclosure is shown on the Architectural Site Plan, sheet A0.0. Is this enclosure part of this project? If so, provide details and dimensions. Add boxed note to sheet A3.2 “Maximum U-value for glazed fenestration is 0.27, and maximum SHGC is 0.23.” This corresponds to values given in building envelope COMcheck included on sheet G0.1. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. Curtain wall elevations on sheet A3.2 indicate fairly large expanses of butt-jointed glazing supported by horizontal frame members spanning 20-feet. Also, the envelope COMcheck on sheet G0.1 indicates that the perimeter frame will be thermally broken. Submit information regarding curtain wall and window system(s) indicating that the frame is thermally broken along with manufacturer’s structural evaluation showing that the curtain wall system will withstand local static and lateral forces for the spans and heights shown. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. A note under the Door, Frame and Hardware Schedule on sheet A6.1 directs the reader to the specifications for a hardware schedule. No specification was included with this drawing set. Provide door hardware schedule for review. |
| 04/11/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Building Plan Review - T17CM02325 Visitor's Center (1st Review) 1250 E Aero Park Boulevard - Building 922 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 11, 2017 DUE DATE: April 20, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. While the building plans are consistent with the current version (1st Review) of the DP under review, the building plans cannot be approved by zoning until the plans have been approved by the Commercial Plans reviewers and the DP is approved. 2. COMMENT: The site plan for the Visitors' Center Building in the current version of the DP and the site plan in the building plans are not consistent in the proposed sidewalk area along the south side of the building. See the copy of the current version of the DP site sheet attached to sheet A0.0 for reference related to this comment. Coordinate with the Engineering firm to verify the required sidewalk location from the loading zone to the building. 3. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage to ensure consistency with the current or approved version of the DP at the time of the next building plan review. 4. COMMENT: If the PDSD or 3rd Party Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments affect the building footprint, height, or square footage of any of the buildings, the DP will have to be updated and re-approved. 5. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the approved version of the DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised building plans as required |
| 04/11/2017 | PIMA COUNTY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | MECHANICAL – COMMERCIAL System Startup/Stop note 4 refers reader to an interlock schedule which does not appear to be included in drawing set. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. Provide heating and cooling calculations summary sheets to justify the capacity of selected equipment. Ref. 2012 IECC C403.2.1 and C403.2.2. Use 104-degrees F summer DB outdoor design temperature with 66-degrees F design wet bulb temperature, and 32-degrees F winter DB outside design temperature per City of Tucson amendment to the 2012 IECC. Per IECC C403.2.1 and C403.2.2 “the output capacity of heating and cooling equipment and systems shall not exceed the loads calculated in accordance with Section C403.2.1.” Please explain how excess outdoor air will be relieved during economizer mode to prevent over-pressurization of building. Ref. 2012 IECC C403.3.1.1.4. How will restroom exhaust fans be switched/controlled to prevent recirculation of air from these spaces except as allowed by 2012 IMC Table C403.3, subscript g. |
| 04/11/2017 | FRODRIG2 | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | WATER – COMMERCIAL Provide the civil site plan in drawing set for reference, to include water meter (and size), backflow device, gas meter, new site sewer line, site water line, etc. Please explain the 2” water service for the amount of fixture units in this building. Per 2012 IPC Table E103.3(3) the estimated demand for 42.65 water fixture units is 27 GPM. Per City of Tucson water meter sizing guidelines, the required meter size of this demand is 1”. |
| 05/11/2017 | CTREVIL1 | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/22/2017 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |