Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T17CM02318
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/25/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: TOWNdesert T17CM02314, T17CM02315, T17CM02316, T17CM02317, T17CM02318, T17CM02319, T17CM02320, T17CM02321 & T17CM02322, Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 25, 2017 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Until development package DP17-0064 is fully approved the building plans cannot be approved. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 05/25/2017 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/02/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Comment not resolved. The generic detail shows how to determine the size of the water hammer arrestors and how to install them but nothing calls for their installation at the clothes washer connection. (Note: detail 2/P5.0 calls for the installation of Watts 8A vacuum breakers at the clothes washer connection but this is not an appropriate application due to the continuous backpressure.) [Initial comment: Provide pressure-absorbing devices for the water connections to appliances equipped with quick acting or solenoid valves (e.g. clothes washers). Reference: Section 604.9, IPC 2012.] |
| 06/02/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Comment not addressed. The water calculations appear to indicate that there is a sub-meter and a backflow preventer for each building. [Initial comment: Clarify the water supply configuration of the apartments. Is each apartment (or building) individually metered with a single backflow prevention assembly located at the Tucson Water meter?] |
| 06/07/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Correct the ventilation calculations per Section M1507.3.3, IRC 2012. A 1-bedroom apartment with less than 1,500 square feet of living area and with the whole-house ventilation fan running only 25% of the time, results in a minimum ventilation rate of 120 CFM. [Initial comment: Revise the ventilation calculations for the Type A and C apartments in building #5. Revise the intermittent ventilation rate factor per Table M1507.3.3 (2), IRC 2012.] 2. Comment not addressed. [Initial comment: Provide ventilation for the leasing office room located in building #5. Reference: Section 403.2, IMC 2012.] |
| 06/08/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Previous Comment 2; Sheet a1.0; Building Areas: There are still no activity numbers established for the parking structures P1 and P2. Please add new activity numbers, including valuations and additional information as required. 2. Previous Comment 5; Sheets a3.0 through a3.4; Wall Legend: Several wall types still indicate wood studs at 18" o.c. Sheet a3.0 revised those spacings to 16" o.c., but Sheets a3.1, a3.2, a3.3, and a3.4 were not revised. Please verify. 3. General: Please provide north arrows on all plans. 4. Sheet a4.4; Plans: There are incomplete section cuts that reference Sheet a7.0. Please complete the section cuts and revise the sheet reference. 5. Structural Calculations: The design calculations provided for the wood beams, lintels, and columns indicate those members were designed using the 2015 IBC. Please revise the code to the 2012 IBC, and verify the design meets that code. Revise calculations and/or drawings as required. 6. Structural Calculations: The design calculations provided for the wood stud walls indicate those members were designed using the 2009 IBC. Please revise the code to the 2012 IBC, and verify the design meets that code. Revise calculations and/or drawings as required. 7. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments. |
| 06/08/2017 | BETH GRANT | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Passed | |
| 06/13/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |