Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T17CM02314
Parcel: 12616303A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T17CM02314
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/04/2017 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Principle Planner

PROJECT: TOWNdesert
T17CM02314, T17CM02315, T17CM02316, T17CM02317, T17CM02318, T17CM02319, T17CM02320, T17CM02321 & T17CM02322,
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 4, 2017

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Until development package DP17-0064 is fully approved the building plans cannot be approved.

3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
04/13/2017 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Sheet a0.1; Sheet index: The index includes sheet a0.0. This sheet is not included in the submittal set. Please verify.
2. Sheet a1.0; Building areas: There are no activity numbers established for the parking structures P1 and P2. Please add new activity numbers. Provide valuations and additional information as required.
3. Sheets a2.0 through a2.4; Demolition keynotes: Note 201 indicates the window schedule on sheet a0.6. Please add sheet a0.5 for additional window schedules.
4. Sheets a3.0 through a3.2; Sheet title: The titles on these sheets indicate 'Progress Set'. Please revise.
5. Sheets a3.0 through a3.4; Wall legend: Several wall types indicate wood studs at 18" o.c. Should these be 16" o.c.? Please verify.
6. Sheet a3.4; Garage foundation plan: Please provide structural calculations and details for the new footings added at the garages.
7. Sheet a3.4; Garage plan: At unit P10, note 309 is indicated at the door. There is no note 309 in the keynotes. Please verify.
8. Sheet a4.4; Garage framing plan: Please provide structural calculations and details for the new beams added at the garages.
9. Sheet a4.4; Garage framing plan: What does the hatched area at units P4, P5, and P6 represent? Please add a note on the drawing (reference sheet a5.0 roof plan).
10. Sheet a5.0; Keynotes: Note 500 indicates 'existing roof. new roofing to be installed'. Please clarify.
11. Sheet a5.0; New roof: Please indicate the nail size and nailing pattern at the new roof.
12. General: Please provide written responses to all review comments.
04/14/2017 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Replot the unit plumbing plans so that the floor plan of the apartment is visible for reference and orientation. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Provide the IPC fixture unit calculations for building 1. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
3. Provide third-party listing and material standards for all plumbing fixtures being installed. Reference: Sections 303.4 and 402, IPC 2012.
4. Revise the design criteria of the water distribution system to provide a flow pressure of 15 PSI or the flow pressure prescribed by the fixture or appliance manufacturer, whichever is greater. Reference: Section 604.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
5. The water system design appears to be based on the use of Type L copper tubing but the recirculation note on sheet P1.1 refers to the use of PEX tubing. If PEX tubing is to be used, provide a table showing the correct PEX tubing sizes to be used. Reference: Sections 303.2 and 604.3, IPC 2012.
6. Provide pressure-absorbing devices for the water connections to appliances equipped with quick acting or solenoid valves (e.g. clothes washers). Reference: Section 604.9, IPC 2012.
7. Provide a full-open valve for the water supply entrance to each dwelling unit unless each fixture is equipped with stop valves. Show the location of the full-open valve. Reference: Section 606.1(6), IPC 2012.
04/17/2017 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Replot the unit mechanical plans so that the floor plan of the apartment is visible for reference and orientation. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. The mechanical floor plan for the apartment has a keynote symbol "3"; what does this signify? Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
3. Revise the ventilation calculations for the Type B apartments in building #1 Revise the intermittent ventilation rate factor per Table M1507.3.3 (2), IRC 2012.
4. Provide exhaust for the residential kitchen per Table 403.3, IMC 2012 (i.e. 100 CFM intermittent or 25 CFM continuous). Reference: Section 403.3, IMC 2012.
5. The dryer vent does not appear to be terminating at the roof of the apartment, revise detail 1/M4.0 to show how the vent terminates. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
6. Provide signage indicating the total equivalent length of the concealed dryer exhaust duct. Reference: Section 504.6.5, IMC 2012.
04/17/2017 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Reqs Change Clarify the water supply configuration of the apartments. Is each apartment (or building) individually metered with a single backflow prevention assembly located at the Tucson Water meter?
04/19/2017 ARUIZ1 ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response.
#1. Ref: Plan Sheet E2, E6.
Provide complete One Line Diagrams for each electrical service for each building including the parking garage. Please include the following information:
(a) Assign a designation label for each service that correlates with the building served.
(b) Total building service load each building and each electrical service.
(c) The site plan shows some of the buildings with 4 meter packs and some with 6 meter packs . The One Line Diagram shows two 6-meter packs with no building designation. Please revise the site plan and or the one-line diagram to show accurate correlation between the two plan documents for the electrical service equipment, include entire site.
(d) The electrical system voltage at the service equipment is shown as (120/208 volts, 3 phase). This does not correlate with voltage ratings shown for the unit sub panels or the load calculations. Please revise to reflect the correct values.
(e) Provide conduit, conductor sizes and types for the electrical service secondary feeders on the plans. Include for each service.
(f) Residential load calculations show exaggerated receptacle devices. For example, there is only one unit 'C', yet the load calcs show 1186 receptacles at 3.5 watts per square foot? Please revise to clarify that there are not 1186 receptacles for that unit. Please address the load calcs for the other units as well.
(g) Ref: Plan Sheet E6. The wording and or symbols within the building exterior walls is not legible due to overlapping of the lettering.

#2. Electrical plans for building #2 basement unit are not included with the electrical plans.
#3. Ref: Plan Sheet E5. The Parking Garage is shown as Unit E. Please correct or clarify.
#4. The sub-panels in units A cannot be located in the bedroom closets. NEC 240.24D.
#5. Provide a switched lighting outlet in the mechanical closets and closets enclosing sub-panels for Units B, C, F.
#6. Verify 36 inches in front and 30 inches horizontal of dedicated working clearance in front of the sub-panels for Units C and F. NEC 110.26
#7. Please clarify for all units, on the lighting and power floorplans.
(a) Not all the light switches have a letter designation for the specific luminaire it controls, and some luminaires do not have a letter designation that correlates with the switch. Also due to the crowding or overlapping of lettering and symbols, it is unclear as to the function or task of the devices. Please clarify.
(b) Some of the luminaires are not designated with a letter or symbol. Please review all the luminaires and provide a designating symbol or letter that correlates with the luminaire schedule.
(c) The lighting schedules and legend do not provide sufficient information to verify compliance with the 2012 IECC. Please provide a complete luminaire schedule, and compliance with the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code.
(d) Receptacle spacing to comply with NEC 210.52A. 6 feet or less from doorways, and 12 feet maximum between receptacles.
(e) Provide for tamper resistant receptacles in the dwelling units as required per NEC 406.5, 406.12.
#8. Provide Activity for permiting of the Parking Garage.
#9. Due to the lack of information, plan documents, and or unclear symbols as defined in these comments, additional comments may be generated at the subsequent plan review.
Ref: 2012 IBC sec. 107.2.1, 2011 NEC, 2012 IECC, and the CITY OF TUCSON Commercial Plan Submittal Requirements (electrical), can be downloaded from www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd.
Dan.santacruz@tucsonaz.gov
04/19/2017 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/22/2017 ARUIZ1 REJECT SHELF Completed