Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T17CM02292
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/24/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | West exit doors (sheet A0.0) do not swing in the direction of travel. Proper swing may impinge on ramp. All doors in an "A" occupancy (except main entrance) require panic hardware, including interior exit doors at back of auditorium. Please add note indicating deferred submittals for sprinklers and alarms are under the jurisdiction of the State Fire Marshal. |
| 04/07/2017 | PIMA COUNTY | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T17CM02292 - PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Reviewer: Chris Anderson, April 5, 2017 BUILDING – COMMERCIAL On sheet T1.0, Code Review Checklist, the building type should be A-3, not E as this is a gymnasium. Revise allowable square footage and modifications. On sheet C1.2, masonry wall with metal fence on top shown in detail 6/C1.2 requires structural calculations as it exceeds 7’-0” in height. Ref. 2012 IBC 105.2(2). Regarding occupant load calculations and application for reduction in occupant load on sheet A0.0: First, please clarify the logic for a reduction from 499 occupants to 97 occupants. By eliminating the occupants of halls, toilets, and teacher’s lounge as written in the basis, the reduction will be much less than 402 persons. Also, there is no teacher’s lounge shown in these plans. Second, what is the purpose for requesting a reduction in occupants per IBC 1004.1.2 (not 1004.1.1 as shown)? The Life Safety Plans indicate that 499 occupants will easily egress the building without requiring a reduction in occupancy. Regarding plumbing fixture calculations on sheet A0.0, the reduction in occupant load would not apply. Per 2012 IBC 1004.1 the occupant load calculations in this Section are for determining means of egress. The restrooms still will need to accommodate all the occupants in the MPR and the classrooms when in use in accordance with Table 2902.1. On sheet A1.0, Section 07212, thermal resistance for batt insulation is shown as R-13 and R-30, whereas the drawings indicate other values (i.e. R-38 for roof/ceiling). Revise to reflect what building sections and details show. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. On sheet A2.0, exterior wall type WT-6 is indicated at classrooms and kitchen. WT-6 has R-13 batt cavity insulation between studs. Also, no insulation is shown for exterior walls at restrooms, MPR and portions of classrooms on 2nd floor. Either comply with the prescriptive insulation requirements of the 2012 IECC Table C402.2 of for climate zone 2 or submit a building envelope COMcheck showing that the design as presented complies with the 2012 IECC. On sheet A2.0, door A114 swings into the MPR and this door is shown to be an exit as an exit sign is shown above the door. 2012 IBC 1008.1.2 egress doors shall swing in the direction of egress travel where serving a room or area containing an occupant load >50.. Window note 8 on sheet A3.4 indicates the U-value and SHGC for all new windows. If an envelope COMcheck is submitted, these window values shall be used in the COMcheck. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. In door hardware schedule, sheet A5.4, egress doors 102 and 115 must be readily openable from the egress side without the use of a key or special knowledge per 2012 IBC 1008.1.9. Confirm that the selected hardware in hardware set 8.0 comply. Per the Door Schedule on sheet A5.0, egress door A201 is to have hardware set 4.0. Add door A201 to that hardware set on sheet A5.4. On sheet S2.0, footing schedule, F1 requires (2) #5 continuous. However, the structural calculations for corresponding footing DF2 on page 31 requires (2) #4 each way. On sheet S2.0, a new double door opening is cut into existing masonry wall. Detail 113 if for the threshold, however the framing plan on sheet S2.1 does not show this opening nor specify a new lintel. Revise drawing and provide structural calculations for the lintel. On sheet S3.0, W8x15 beams supporting RTU’s and basketball backstops are shown. Provide structural calculations. Stair details on sheet S5.0 refer to plans for stringer sizes, however not noted on plan. Structural calculations specify C12x20.7. Please add to drawing set. Ref. 2012 IBC 107.2.1. Provide structural calculations for the steel arch structure shown in details 229 and 128. Provide structural calculations and design for the light pole base shown on sheet E1.1. |
| 04/07/2017 | FRODRIG2 | WATER | REVIEW | Approved | APPROVED BY PIMA COUNTY. |
| 04/07/2017 | PIMA COUNTY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLUMBING – COMMERCIAL Provide a site utilities plan with this drawing set showing existing sewer, water meter, new water lines and new sewer and water with connection points. Plumbing plans show utilities entering and exiting building on west side while utilities shown on site plan are shown on east side of building. On Plumbing Fixture Schedule, sheet P2.1, the lavatory faucets must deliver no more than 0.25 gallon per metering cycle per City of Tucson amendment to the 2012 IPC. Confirm that specified faucet complies. |
| 04/07/2017 | PIMA COUNTY | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ELECTRICAL – COMMERCIAL Revise Compliance Calculation for Exterior Lumens on sheet E1.1 as follows: since there is at least one unshielded exterior light, use Option 3 rather than Option 2 from the OLC Table 401.1. Total lumens allowed is 175,000 per acre and total unshielded lumens allowed per acre is 11,000. |
| 04/07/2017 | PIMA COUNTY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | MECHANICAL – COMMERCIAL The Packaged Rooftop Unit Schedule on sheet M2.1 indicates a summer design Db temperature of 106-degrees F. Per City of Tucson amendment to the 2012 IECC the summer design temperature for Tucson is 104-degrees F and the winter design Db temperature is 32-degrees F. Select heating and cooling equipment based on these design temperatures and revise schedule capacities. The HVAC Load Calculations seem to indicate that the proposed equipment is oversized. Per 2012 IECC C403.2.1, “the output capacity shall not exceed the loads calculated in accordance with C403.2.1. The output capacity of heating and cooling equipment and systems shall not exceed the loads calculated in accordance with Section C403.2.1. A single piece of equipment providing both heating and cooling shall satisfy the provision for one function with the capacity for the other function as small as possible, within available equipment options.” Please reselect heating and cooling equipment or provide substantial justification based on standard engineering practices for the selected equipment. |
| 04/12/2017 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |