Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T17CM01721
Parcel: 132130890

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW

Permit Number - T17CM01721
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/23/2017 JVINCEN1 FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change Note on cover sheet indicates no fire sprinklers required. However, sheet A100 and multiple plumbing sheets reference a fire riser room. Please clarify intent. If no sprinklers are to be installed, please remove all references to the fire riser room and fire sprinkler system.
03/23/2017 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the gas load for the two proposed water heaters base on their maximum loads of 199 BTUH each. Reference: Sections 402.1 and 402.3, IFGC 2012.
2. Verify that the automatic faucets in the restrooms will operate for a minimum time of 10-seconds for accessibility. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-09.
3. The specified Symmons Series 5 thermostatic mixing valve is an obsolete product. Specify a mixing valve that is listed to ASSE 1070 for supplying tempered water to the restroom lavatories. Reference: Sections 303.4 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012.
4. Verify that the proposed two water heaters can supply the total hot water demand with only 8.4 GPM at an 80-degree Fahrenheit rise. Reference: Section 607.1, IPC 2012.
5. At a minimum, beverage dispensers require the use of a backflow preventer that is listed to ASSE 1022. Reference: Section 608.16.10, IPC 2012.
6. The civil utility drawing indicates that a backwater valve will be required for this building. Show the location of the backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
7. The vents serving the proposed gravity grease interceptor are not required to rise vertically to at least 6" above the flood rim of the interceptor prior to running horizontally. They are however, required to rise at least 6" above the flood rim of the interceptor prior to joining. Reference: Sections 905.4 and 905.5, IPC 2012.
8. Provide sizing calculations for the gravity grease interceptor per Section 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
9. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012.
03/23/2017 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings to a minimum height of 3/32-inch. If the CaptiveAire shop drawings are to be included as work done under your supervision, ensure that they are legible. (Note, the shop drawings appear to be for a facility located in Mesa, Arizona.) Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
2. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; COMcheck was not found on sheet A450. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation and the SHGC for the fenestration. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.
3. Show how one of the "Additional Efficiency Package Options" (C406, IECC 2012) is to be accomplished. Reference: Section C401.2, IECC 2012.
4. Revise the mechanical COMcheck compliance certificate to use the 2012 edition of the IECC rather than the 2009 edition.
5. Revise the water heater description in the mechanical COMcheck compliance certificate to show a natural gas input of 199 kBtu/h instead of 180 Btu/h. Verify the efficiency of the proposed water heaters; the published data for the Rennai model R94LSi shows an energy factor of 0.82 rather than the 0.94 used in the submitted COMcheck.
6. Verify that the three rooftop AC units will be equipped with economizers complying with the requirements of Section C403.3.1.1, IECC 2012.
7. Show how the excess outside air will be relieved from the building when the three rooftop AC units are in economizer mode. Verify that the relief air will not be recirculated into the building. Reference: Section C403.3.1.1.4, IECC 2012.
8. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012.
9. Show that each rooftop unit has a thermostatic control that provides for off-hour and set-back control, automatic shutdown and automatic start-up control (i.e. the thermostat is capable of automatically adjusting the start time of the HVAC equipment in order to bring the interior conditions to the desired temperature at the start of occupancy) and, if the thermostat does not require manual changeover from the heating and cooling modes, it restricts set point overlap. Reference: Section C403.2.4, IECC 2012.
10. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drains from the three rooftop units. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.
11. Clarify the labeling of the rooftop units. RTU-1 is noted as both RTU-1 and RTU-3 on sheets M100 and M200 while RTU-3 is called out as both RTU-3 and RTU-1 on sheet M200.
12. Clarify the controls for exhaust fans EF-1, EF-2, EF-3, and EF-4. The specifications shown on sheet M000 do not correspond with the control requirements shown on sheet M100. Reference; Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012
13. Clarify the sequence of operation for exhaust fan EF-4. The electrical power plan on E200 calls for the fan to be interlocked with RTU-1 but the restrooms are conditioned by RTU-2. Reference; Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012 and Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012.
14. Revise the balancing information for the restroom exhaust fan so that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012.
15. Show the location of exhaust fan EF-5 and clarify the exhaust flow rate; it is noted as 300 CFM on the Fan Schedule and 50 CFM on the Air Balance Schedule. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
16. Clarify the location of the CO2 cabinet identified on the Fan Schedule and provide the capacity of the CO2 system. If the carbon dioxide storage consists of more than two 50-pound cylinders, provide a mechanical exhaust system activated by an asphyxiant gas detection system. Reference: Tucson Fire Department Standard Operating Guideline for Compressed Gases dated 04/28/2015.
03/23/2017 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the water meter sizing calculations using the proposed location in Tucson. The civil drawings indicate a 1" water meter is to be provided with a 1-1/2" water service line. Tucson Water allows a maximum demand of 37.5 GPM for a 1" meter.
2. Tucson Water data indicates a water pressure range of 50 to 57 PSI at the proposed location.
03/23/2017 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change PDSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Steve Shields
Principle Planner

PROJECT: 1058 E. Tucson Marketplace Bl.
T17CM01721
Building Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 23, 2017

1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. The development package sheets provided in the building plan set are not the approved development package sheets. Either provide the approved development package sheets, remove the development package sheets or stamp all development package sheets as "FOR REFERENCE ONLY".

3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956
03/24/2017 ERIC NEWCOMB COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING Approved
03/24/2017 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change T17CM01721
NEW POPEYE'S RESTAURANT
BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS

1. SHEET CS100: PLEASE ADD A NOTE INDICATING THE PRE-FAB METAL CANOPIES WILL BE A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL AND SHALL INCLUDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DETAILS. PLEASE FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 107.3.4.1.
2. SHEET SD125; SITE DETAIL 19 (REFERENCE SHEET SD127): SINCE THIS WALL EXCEEDS THE 7 FOOT LIMIT, STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE WALL AND FOUNDATION DESIGN. PLEASE PROVIDE. IS THE 8'-0" HEIGHT CORRECT?
3. SHEET SD125; SITE DETAILS (SIGNS): PLEASE VERIFY THE FOUNDATIONS FOR SIGN DETAILS 1, 2, 3, 5, AND 8 HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE SIGNS DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF TUCSON.
4. SHEET A001; ACCESSIBLE STANDARDS: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. IN ADDITION, PLEASE DARKEN THE FONT.
5. SHEET A001; ACCESSIBLE STANDARDS: IT APPEARS THE STANDARDS LISTED HERE ARE NOT FROM THE 2009 EDITION OF THE ICC/ANSI A117.1. PLEASE VERIFY THESE STANDARDS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THAT EDITION AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
6. SHEET A002; SECTION 604.3.1; FIGURE 604.3.1: SECTION 604.3.1 INDICATES A MINIMUM 60" X 56" CLEARANCE AROUND A WATER CLOSET, WHILE FIGURE 604.3.1 INDICATES A MINIMUM 60" X 60" CLEARANCE. PLEASE CLARIFY.
7. SHEET A002; FIGURE 604.5.1: PLEASE PROVIDE AND LOCATE A VERTICAL GRAB BAR PER THE 2009 ICC/ANSI FIGURE 604.5.1.
8. SHEET A100; FLOOR PLAN: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE SECTION ELEVATION AND DETAIL SHEET REFERENCES.
9. SHEET A102: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE SECTION, ELEVATION, AND DETAIL SHEET REFERENCES IN ADDITION TO FINISH SCHEDULES.
10. SHEET A102; FLOOR PLAN: PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE TRENCH DRAINS.
11. SHEET A103; SECTION 1: PLEASE INDICATE ALL FRAMING MEMBER SIZES AND CONNECTIONS.
12. SHEET A120; INTERIOR SIGN PACKAGE TABLE: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE.
13. SHEET A126; MOUNTING NOTES: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT.
14. SHEET A180; SEATING PLAN 3: SHEET CS100 INDICATES 74 TOTAL SEATS. PER THE IBC SECTION 1109.11, THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SEATS IS 5% (FOUR SEATS TOTAL). PLEASE INDICATE THIS CALCULATION ON SHEET CS100, AND SHOW THOSE SEAT LOCATIONS ON THE SEATING PLAN 3.
15. SHEET A201; DETAIL 2: NOTE 11 INDICATES TO SEE STRUCTURAL FOR WALL BLOCKING. THERE ARE NO NOTES ON THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS CONCERNING BLOCKING FOR THE ROOF HATCH/LADDER (SHOULD REFERENCE 3/A201?). PLEASE VERIFY.
16. SHEET A201; DETAIL 2: NOTE 9 INDICATES A STEEL ANGLE PER STRUCTURAL AT THE HATCH OPENING. NO NOTE CONCERNING THE STEEL ANGLES WERE LOCATED ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. PLEASE VERIFY.
17. SHEET A300; ELEVATIONS 2 AND 3: PLEASE REVERSE THE DIRECTION REFERENCE IN THE ELEVATION TITLES.
18. SHEET A300; ELEVATION 11: WHERE IS THIS ELEVATION INDICATED ON THE FLOOR PLAN? PLEASE VERIFY.
19. SHEET A300; ELEVATIONS: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE SECTION SHEET REFERENCES.
20. SHEET A301; ELEVATIONS 2 AND 3: PLEASE REVISE THE TITLES OF THESE ELEVATIONS.
21. SHEET A400; BUILDING SECTION 2: WHERE IS THIS SECTION CUT ON THE PLAN? PLEASE VERIFY.
22. SHEET A425; SECTION 4: THIS SECTION IS CUT ON THE FLOOR PLAN AT DOOR 1. IT APPEARS THE PLAN INDICATES A CANOPY IN THIS AREA THAT DOES NOT SHOW UP ON THE SECTION. PLEASE CLARIFY.
23. SHEET A425; WALL SECTION 3: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE THE DETAIL SHEET REFERENCES.
24. SHEET A425; WALL SECTION 3: AT THE CANOPY SUPPORT ROD, A DETAIL REFERENCES 8/451. PLEASE REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE.
25. SHEET A426; SECTION 2: THE SECTION INDICATES 2X6 WALL STUDS, WHILE THE FLOOR PLAN INDICATES WALL C (2X8). PLEASE COORDINATE.
26. SHEET A426; WALL SECTION 1: AT THE CANOPY, A DETAIL REFERENCES 8/A451. PLEASE REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE.
27. SHEET A451; DETAIL 5: AT THE WALL, A DETAIL REFERENCES 4/A451. PLEASE REVISE THE DETAIL REFERENCE.
28. SHEET A451; BALCONY FRAMING PLAN 11: WHERE IS THIS LOCATED ON THE PLAN? PLEASE VERIFY.
29. SHEET A451; DETAILS 2 AND 2A: A NOTE INDICATES TO REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR MORE DETAILS AND INFORMATION. NO ADDITIONAL DETAILS OR INFORMATION WERE FOUND ON THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. PLEASE VERIFY.
30. SHEET A451; DETAIL 5: THE NOTE CONCERNING THE CANOPY SHOULD BE REVISED. PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DETAILS (SEE COMMENT 1).
31. SHEET A600; DOOR SCHEDULE: DOORS 1a, 3a, AND 4 INDICATE HARDWARE SETS 1 AND 2, WHICH INCLUDE PANIC HARDWARE. HOWEVER, IT IS NOT INDICATED IN THE 'PANIC' COLUMN OF THE TABLE. PLEASE COORDINATE.
32. SHEET S0.1; BUILDING CODE: THE EDITION OF THE BUILDING CODE REFERENCES THE CITY OF COMMERCE. PLEASE REVISE.
33. SHEET S0.1; INTERPRETATION OF DRAWINGS TABLE AND ABBREVIATIONS TABLE: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE.
34. SHEET S0.2: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE.
35. SHEET S1.1; NOTES AND SCHEDULES: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE.
36. SHEET S1.1 (SHEAR WALL SCHEDULES); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEAR CAPACITIES TABLE): SW2 INDICATES 19/32" PLYWOOD SHEATHING ATTACHED WITH 8d NAILS IN THE SCHEDULE, WHILE THE CALCULATION TABLE INDICATES ONLY 10d NAILS AT THAT SHEATHING THICKNESS. PLEASE VERIFY CONNECTION SIZE AND SPACING.
37. SHEET S1.1; FOUNDATION PLAN: THE SHEAR WALL HOLDOWN NOTE IN THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PLAN INDICATES 19 TYPICAL HOLDOWNS. PLEASE VERIFY THAT NUMBER.
38. SHEET S2.2; DETAIL 211: PLEASE REVISE THE DETAIL TITLE TO 'PREFAB WOOD TRUSS AT INTERIOR WOOD SHEAR WALL'.
39. SHEET S2.2; DETAIL 208: PLEASE REVISE THE DETAIL TITLE TO 'PREFAB WOOD TRUSS PARALLEL TO EXTERIOR WOOD SHEAR WALL'.
40. SHEET S2.1; DETAILS 112, 113, AND 114: PER COMMENT 2, PLEASE PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THESE FOUNDATIONS.
41. SHEET S2.1; DETAILS 108 AND 109: PLEASE PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE MASONRY WALLS AND FOOTINGS.
42. SHEET S2.1; DETAIL 111: PLEASE PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION.
43. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
03/29/2017 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. ALSO PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE.
#1. Ref: Plan Sheet E001, E002. Identify the exterior luminaires at their locations shown on these plan sheets to make it possible correlate them with the luminaire schedules.
#2. Provide full compliance with the 2012 IECC for the proposed lighting for this project.
#3. Provide full compliance with the TUCSON/PIMA COUNTY OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE for the exterior lighting. This code can be downloaded from www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd. The plan documents shall contain all the information necessary to provide evidence that the proposed exterior lighting meets the requirements of this code. See section 104,"Permits and Plan Submission Requirements"
#4. Ref: Plan Sheet E100, E200. Minimum text size (font) required to be no smaller than 3/32".
#5. Ref: Plan Sheet E300. Please provide the following information on the Single Line Diagram.
(a) Conduit, conductor sizes and types for the secondary feeders from the utility transformer to the CT Enclosure. And from the CT Enclosure to the Main Service Disconnect.
(b) Please clarify the equipment arrangement and installation on the plan for the electrical service equipment. The current Electrical Code adopted by the City of Tucson is the 2011 National Electrical Code, with no local amendment that should affect the design by the registrant. The note on the plan, "THESE ITEMS ONLY WHEN REQUIRED BY LOCAL CODES" is somewhat inexplicit, because it can allow for possible changes in the field (value engineering) by the installer or contractor. Please remove this note, and provide a complete code compliant electrical service per 2011 NEC. And it may also include any Utility requirements for metering or conduit stub ups into the utility transformer that may apply.
(c) The note, "LISTED FOR AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT" that points to the Main Service Disconnect should show the Available Fault Current (AIC) from the utility to the supply side of the Main Service Disconnect. F1, is shown at the load side of the Main Service Disconnect. This information would be necessary to provide the correct rating for the equipment, or the fuses, as would be needed in order to provide a Series Rated System down-steam per "PANEL AND BREAKER NOTE".
(d) The Electrical system Design exceeds the allowable size and rating for other than an Electrical Design Professional registered in the STATE OF ARIZONA, to seal and sign the electrical plans. Per the CITY of TUCSON COMMERCIAL PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (electrical), Also per the STATE of ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES 32-125, and BOARD of TECHNICAL REGISTRATION RULES R4-30-302, R4-30-304. An Electrical Professional Engineer registered in the State of Arizona is required to Design, Seal and Sign the electrical plans when the electrical system exceeds 400 amps and or the available fault current exceeds 22k (COT). 225 amp 120/208 volts 3 phase (ARIZONA STATE)
Ref: 2012 IBC sec. 107.2.1, 2011 NEC, TUCSON/PIMA COUNTY OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE, CITY OF TUCSON COMMERCIAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, Outdoor Lighting Code and COT Plan Submittal Requirements can be downloaded from www.tucsonaz.gov.
Dan Santa Cruz
CITY OF TUCSON, COMMERCIAL ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
Dan.santacruz@tucsonaz.gov
04/03/2017 ARUIZ1 WWM REVIEW Needs Review

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/03/2017 ARUIZ1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed