Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T17CM01297
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/03/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. With regard to the COMcheck Envelope Compliance Certificate, show how a continuous layer of insulation (R-2) is to be installed on the roof assembly. Reference: Section 303.2, IECC 2012. 2. The COMcheck Envelope Compliance Certificate calls out R-24 cavity insulation in the exterior walls along with R-2 continuous insulation. The exterior wall sections on A5.1 show R-19 cavity insulation and do not specify the R-value for the continuous insulation (see Specification Section 07240-2D on sheet A6). Reference: Section C103.2, IECC 2012. 3. Coordinate the window specifications (Section 08800, A6) with the window descriptions used on COMcheck. Note that the fenestration shall be NFRC -certified for U-value and the Solar Heat Gain Coefficient. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C303.1.3, IECC 2012. 4. Specify the U-value and the Solar Heat Gain Coefficient for the glazed door on the drawings and coordinate the values with COMcheck. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C303.1.3, IECC 2012. 5. Verify that the relief air outlet on the specified rooftop heat pumps is not located in a way that would allow recirculation of the relief air into the building. Reference: section C403.3.1.1.4, IECC 2012. |
| 03/03/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide the civil drawings referenced on sheet P1 that show the location, route and size of the proposed building sewer, the locations of the cleanouts, and the point of connection to the public sewer. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Clarify the size of the proposed reduced pressure backflow preventer; it is shown as 2" in the water calculations and 1-1/2" in General Note B on sheet P1. |
| 03/03/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the civil drawings referenced on sheet P1 that show the location and sizes of the proposed water meter, backflow preventer, and water service to the building. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 03/14/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET A1; PLAN KEY NOTES: NOTES 4, 9, AND 10 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. PLEASE VERIFY. 2. SHEET A1; WALL TYPES: ON WALL TYPES A AND A1, PLEASE PROVIDE THE STUD GAUGE, OR REFERENCE STRUCTURAL (VERIFY STRUCTURAL PROVIDES THAT INFORMATION). 3. SHEET A2; PLAN KEY NOTES: NOTE 2 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE PLAN. PLEASE VERIFY. 4. SHEET A3; SECTIONS 5 AND 6: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. PLEASE REVISE. 5. SHEET A3; SECTION NOTES: THERE ARE MANY SECTION NOTES THAT ARE NOT INDICATED ON THE SECTIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE. 6. SHEET A5.1; SECTION NOTES: NOTES 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, AND 18 WERE NOT LOCATED ON THE SECTIONS. PLEASE VERIFY. 7. SHEET S3.0; ROOF FRAMING PLAN NOTES: NOTE 6 (LOCATED ON THE PLAN NEAR GRIDS C AND 1) DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CORRECT. PLEASE VERIFY. 8. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 03/20/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 03/21/2017 | KROBLES1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/21/2017 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |