Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T17CM00849
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/15/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/22/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Building Plan Review - T16CM00838, T16CM00839, T16CM00840, T16CM00843, T16CM00844, T16CM00845, T16CM00846, T16CM00847, T16CM00848, T16CM00849, T16CM00850 Self Storage at Sunset Ranch (1st Review) 2720 N Silverbell Road TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 22, 2017 DUE DATE: March 14, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the building plans but cannot approve them at this time. While the building plans are consistent with the current version of the DP under review, the building plans cannot be approved by zoning until the plans have been approved by the Commercial Plans reviewers and the DP is approved. 2. COMMENT: Zoning will review the building plans on the next submittal as it relates to the zoning review purview and compare the building plan footprint, building height, and square footage to ensure consistency with the approved DP. 3. COMMENT: If PDSD Commercial Plan Reviewer's comments affect the building footprint, height, or square footage of any of the buildings, the DP will have to be updated and re-approved. 4. COMMENT: Once the plans have been reviewed and approved by the Commercial Plan Reviewers and zoning has verified consistency with the approved DP, the building plans can be approved by zoning. 5. COMMENT: Assure that the copies of the DP that are included in the building package are copies of the approved and signed set. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 02/24/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/24/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 02/27/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide energy code compliance calculations for the building envelope; use the climate zone for Tucson. Provide sufficient detail on the drawings to evaluate the energy compliance of the building envelope. The information shall, as a minimum, include U-factors of the envelope systems and fenestration components, along with the R-values of the insulation. Reference: Sections C103.2 and C401.2, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 2. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012. |
| 02/27/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET T1; DEVELOPMENT DATA: PLEASE REVISE THE ALLOWABLE AREA OF THE OFFICE TO 9000 SF. 2. SHEET T1; DEVELOPMENT DATA: A NOTE ON THIS SHEET INDICATES "MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS = 10'-0" ". PER THE IBC SECTION 705.3, TWO BUILDINGS MUST HAVE AN IMAGINARY LINE BETWEEN THEM (ACTS AS A PROPERTY LINE). THE SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND THE PROPERTY LINE WILL DETERMINE THE FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE, AND IN TURN WILL BE USED WITH TABLE 602 TO DETERMINE THE FIRE RESISTANCE RATING REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE REVISE THE NOTE. 3. SHEET T1; DEVELOPMENT DATA: PER THE IBC SECTION 705.5, THE REQUIRED FIRE RESISTANCE RATING FOR EXTERIOR WALLS MUST BE DETERMINED BY TABLES 601 AND 602. USING TABLE 601, THE EXTERIOR BEARING WALLS (TYPE IIIB CONSTRUCTION) REQUIRE A TWO HOUR RATING, AND FOR THE TYPE VB CONSTRUCTION REQUIRE A 0 HOUR RATING. USING TABLE 602, FOR A FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE OF LESS THAN 5 FEET, THE S-1 EXTERIOR WALLS MUST HAVE A TWO HOUR RATING. FOR A FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE OF 5 FEET TO LESS THAN 30 FEET, THE S-1 EXTERIOR WALLS MUST HAVE A ONE HOUR RATING. FOR A FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE OF LESS THAN 10 FEET, B EXTERIOR WALLS MUST HAVE A ONE HOUR RATING. FOR A FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE FROM 10 FEET UP TO LESS THAN 30 FEET, THE B EXTERIOR WALL MUST HAVE A O FIRE RESISTANCE RATING. PLEASE VERIFY AND INDICATE THIS ANALYSIS ON THE DRAWINGS. 4. SHEET T1; DEVELOPMENT DATA: SINCE TABLE 601 REQUIRES TWO HOUR FIRE RESISTANT RATED WALLS FOR ALL S-1 EXTERIOR WALLS, THE SEPARATION DISTANCE REQUIREMENT IS MET FOR ALL BUILDINGS 2 THROUGH 11. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS A TWO HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATED EXTERIOR WALL, (AND THE DOORS IN THOSE WALLS MUST BE RATED), IS REQUIRED AT ALL S-1 OCCUPANCY TYPE BUILDINGS. IN ADDITION, INDICATE THE U.L. NUMBER FOR A TWO HOUR EXTERIOR RATED MASONRY WALL, AND PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THAT U.L. NUMBER ON THE DRAWING. 5. SHEET T1; BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY: PLEASE INDICATE ON THIS SHEET THE TOTAL NUMBER OF STORAGE UNITS AND THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE UNITS PER THE IBC TABLE 1108.3. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THOSE ACCESSIBLE UNITS ON THE SITE PLAN (SHEET A0). DISPERSE THE LOCATION PER THE IBC SECTION 1108.3.1. 6. SHEET A9; FIXTURE/ACCESSORY ELEVATIONS: PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS AND DIMENSIONS FOR THE RESTROOM GRAB BARS ON THE DRAWINGS PER THE ICC/ANSI FIGURES 604.5.1 AND 604.5.2. 7. SHEET S1.6; SHEET T1: PLEASE VERIFY THE MASONRY WALLS (WITH MASONRY PER SHEET S1.0 AND REINFORCING PER S1.6 SCHEDULE) MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE U.L. NUMBER FOR THE FIRE RESISTANT RATED WALLS PER SHEET T1. 8. SHEET S2.6 (KEYNOTES); SHEET A11 (ROOF PLAN): KEYNOTE 7 ON S2.6 INDICATES TO SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ROOF HATCH SIZE AND LOCATION. KEYNOTE 7 WAS NOT LOCATED ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN (S2.6), AND SHEET A11 DOES NOT INDICATE A HATCH SIZE OR LOCATION ON THE ROOF PLAN. PLEASE COORDINATE. 9. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 108: NOTE 5 IS INDICATED ON THE DETAIL BUT NOT LISTED IN THE NOTES. PLEASE PROVIDE. 10. SHEET S4.0; DETAILS 201, 202, AND 203: AT THE SOLID GROUTED BOND BEAMS, PLEASE REFERENCE THE TYPICAL MASONRY WALL REINFORCING SCHEDULE ON SHEET S1.6. 11. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 202: PLEASE CHANGE THE NOTE 7 REFERENCE ON THE DETAIL TO NOTE 6. 12. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE AN OCCUPANT LOAD ON THE DRAWING FOR THIS BUILDING. 13. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 03/13/2017 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP16-206 needs to be approved first. |
| 03/15/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/21/2017 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/21/2017 | AMORALE3 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |