Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T17CM00673
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/30/2017 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/09/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: City Park Mixed Use T17CM00673 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 9, 2017 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Until development package DP16-0202 is fully approved the building plans cannot be approved. 3. It appears that there balconies that encroach into the right of way along Congress Street. Some type of easement or agreement is required for this encroachment. Contact COT Real Estate to secure the easement or agreement. The easement or agreement will need to be secured prior to approval of the building plans. 4. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 02/13/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Tucson Water limits a 3/4" meter to a maximum demand of 22.5 GPM. The water calculations on sheet P7.0 show an initial proposed demand of 59 GPM. Revise the plans to require that the existing ¾" water meter being replaced with at least a 1-1/2" meter. 2. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. Provide verification from Tucson Water that the proposed location for the two reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies will be acceptable. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf |
| 02/14/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the font size used on the drawings (M1.0, M2.0, M3.0, M4.0, M5.0, and M6.0) to a minimum height of 3/32-inch. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Replot sheets M1.0, M2.0, M3.0, M4.0, M5.0, and M6.0: the numbers in the architectural backgrounds are primarily shown as rectangles. 3. Revise the details of the exterior steel-framed walls to call out the required minimum R-value of the batt insulation. Reference: Section C103.2, IECC 2012. 4. Specify the required maximum NFRC-certified U-factors and Solar Heat Gain Coefficients (SHGC) for the fenestration and doors on the architectural drawings or use appropriate default U-factor from Table C303.1.3 (1), IECC 2012 for the fenestration components on the COMcheck envelope compliance certificate. Reference: Section C103.2, IECC 2012. 5. Clarify how the specified fan-coil units relate to the HVAC system numbers used in the mechanical COMcheck analysis. |
| 02/14/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Replot sheets P1.0, P2.0, P3.0, P4.0, P5.0, and P6.0: the numbers in the architectural backgrounds are primarily shown as rectangles. 2. Horizontal branches shall connect no closer than ten diameters downstream of the bases of vertical stacks (see 3/P7.1). Reference: Section 704.3, IPC 2012. 3. Provide a cleanout at the base of each vertical rainwater conductor that connects to an underground storm drain. Reference: Sections 708.3.4 and 1101.8, IPC 2012. 4. The architectural roof plan, A3.0, Shows an additional roof drain and overflow drain located near D-8 (this is also shown on the background for P6.0) but no drain conductors are associated with the drains. Reference: Sections 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012. 5. The horizontal conductors associated with the roof and overflow drains located near C.5-4 are too small based on a roof area of 4606 square feet and a slope of ¼" per 12". Reference: Table 1106.3, IPC 2012. |
| 02/15/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET G1.0; IMPACT FEE NOTE: THE NOTE INDICATES AN EXISTING BUILDING OF 4742 SF WAS DEMOLITIONED UNDER PERMIT T14BU01117. THAT PERMIT NUMBER WAS FOR A 60' X 80' TENT (4800 SF), AND WAS NOT FOR A DEMOLITION. PLEASE PROVIDE THE PERTINENT DEMOLITION PERMIT NUMBER, OR EXPLAIN THE NUMBER LISTED. 2. SHEET G1.0; IMPACT FEE NOTE: THE NOTE INDICATES THE NEW BUILDING IS 11,771 SF. THE ACTUAL NEW BUILDING SF IS 64,697 (PER SHEET G1.0 SCOPE). PLEASE CLARIFY. 3. SHEET G1.0; REFERENCE SITE PLAN: PLEASE INDICATE ON THIS PLAN THE DISTANCE FROM ALL OF THE EXTERIOR WALLS TO THE PROPERTY LINES OR TO EXISTING BUILDINGS. THESE DISTANCES ARE REQUIRED. FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE EXTERIOR WALL FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS. 4. SHEET G1.1; CODE REVIEW (CONSTRUCTION TYPE REQUIREMENTS): THE EAST EXTERIOR WALL AT THE STAIRS INDICATES A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF TWO HOURS BASED ON THE FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE IN IBC TABLE 602. THE TWO HOUR RATING IS ACTUALLY BASED ON THE IBC SECTION 1022.2 (SEE SECTION 1026.6). THE TABLE 602 INDICATES A ONE HOUR REQUIRED FIRE RESISTANCE RATING. PLEASE NOTE THIS ON THE DRAWING. 5. SHEET G1.1; CODE REVIEW (CONSTRUCTION TYPE REQUIREMENTS): PLEASE INCLUDE THE FIRE RESISTANCE RATING FOR INTERIOR EXIT STAIRS (SECTION 1022.1), EXIT PASSAGEWAYS (SECTION 1023.3), HORIZONTAL EXITS (SECTION 1025.1), OPENINGS (SECTION 707.6), SHAFT ENCLOSURES (SECTION 713.4), PENETRATIONS (SECTION 714), JOINTS (SECTION 715), DUCT/AIR TRANSFER OPENINGS (SECTION 717), AND CONTROL AREAS FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (SECTION 414.2.4) AS THEY APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. 6. SHEET G1.1; CODE REVIEW: SINCE OCCUPANT LOADS, MEANS OF EGRESS, NUMBER OF EXITS, SIZE OF EXITS, AND LOCATION OF EXITS ARE NOT DETERMINED AT THIS TIME (THIS IS A SHELL PERMIT), THE CODE ANALYSIS FOR THIS INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH FIRST TENANT-IN IMPROVEMENT, AND WILL BE REVIEWED AT THAT TIME UNDER EACH PERMIT BY THE CITY OF TUCSON. 7. SHEET G1.1; CODE REVIEW: THE REQUIRED FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS FOR ALL COMPONENTS MUST BE PROVIDED FOR EACH FIRST TENANT-IN IMPROVEMENT, AND WILL BE REVIEWED AT THAT TIME UNDER EACH PERMIT BY THE CITY OF TUCSON. 8. SHEET G1.1; FIRST FLOOR LIFE SAFETY PLAN: THE NORTH AND SOUTH STAIRS APPEAR TO BE OPEN ON ONE OR MORE SIDES AT VARIOUS FLOOR LEVELS. PLEASE VERIFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTIONS 1009.2.2, 1009.3, AND 1022.2 ARE MET FOR THE STAIRWAY ENCLOSURES BY THE FIRE CURTAIN SPECIFIED IN ADDITION TO THE STRUCTURAL SUPPORT DETAIL 72/S1.6. PLEASE PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED. 9. SHEET S3.4 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (SHEET 319): THE JOIST DESIGN INDICATES TO USE A 12" K JOIST FOR 23'-10" SPAN (WORST CASE SPAN). THE PLAN INDICATES AREAS USING 14" K JOISTS. PLEASE INCLUDE IN THE CALCULATIONS THE WORST CASE SPAN FOR THE 14" JOISTS. 10. SHEETS A2.0, A2.1, A2.2, A2.3, AND A2.4; FLOOR PLAN: IN KEYNOTE 125, PLEASE INCLUDE THE SPECIFIC CODE SECTION THAT ADDRESSES THIS CONDITION (TWO HOUR FIRE RATED CONSTRUCTION FOR 10' EITHER SIDE OF LOBBY GLASS). 11. SHEETS A2.1, A2.2, A2.3, AND A2.4; FLOOR PLAN: PLUMBING FIXTURE REQUIREMENTS AND ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS WILL BE REVIEWED DURING THE FIRST TENANT-IN IMPROVEMENT FOR EACH PERMIT BY THE CITY OF TUCSON. 12. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 02/21/2017 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | The agreement of a fee to be paid to Park Wise for eliminating parking meters must be completed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. A hold must be placed on the CofO for the building permit/TI prior to approval of this combo permit for a shell building. The DP16-0202 must also be approved first. This was approved by Loren Makus on 4/5/17. |
| 02/21/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/23/2017 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The following are needed for Sewer Connection Fee Application Approval: Need PCRWRD/IWC/Steven Valencia review – 520-724-6200 (steven.valencia@pima.gov). Need site plan submitted with building drawings showing the location and method of connection to the public sewer. Need to clarify the water meters that are being installed as part of this project and all the existing water meters that are being removed or replaced for a PCRWRD credit evaluation. FYI: *Type III Capacity #2017-008 dated 1/18/17 has been issued per PCRWRD/Kurt Stemm. *PCRWRD Variance Request has been approved for City Park per Carol Johnson dated 2/17/17. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/02/2017 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |