Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T17CM00450
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/08/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. With the occupant load of 189 people shown on sheet G004, a total of three water closets are required, two for women and one for men. In addition, Section 1109.5.1, IBC 2012 and Section 410.2, IPC 2012 require the installation of two drinking fountains for accessibility (i.e. a high-low drinking fountain or two separate drinking fountains mounted at accessible heights). Note that your occupant load calculation is incorrect (it should be 240 people) but the required number of fixtures is unchanged from the 189-person occupant load. [Initial comment: Provide calculations to show that the minimum plumbing facilities required by Table 2902.1 and Section 2902.2, IBC 2012 for A3 assembly occupancy are being installed.] 2. The water calculation still refers to the water meter having a maximum flowrate of 100 GPM. [Initial comment: With regard to the water calculation, Tucson Water limits a 1" meter to a maximum demand of 37.5 GPM.] |
| 03/08/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Revise the ventilation calculations to include the occupants of the lobby (30 people per 1,000 square feet) and the ventilation for the storage areas (0.06 CFM per square foot). Note that the value for Ez is identified as 0.8 in the chart but the calculations used Ez = 1.0 instead. [Initial comment: Calculation of the required minimum ventilation for air handlers serving multiple zones requires the balancing data (supply CFM) for each zone and the calculations described in Sections 403.3.2.3.1 through 403.3.2.3.4, IMC 2012. Reference: section 403.3.2.3, IMC 2012.] 2. The return air is still using the corridor, A102, as a duct because the air has to pass through door A102B in order to return to HP-1. [Initial comment: Revise the mechanical design as required to avoid using corridor A102 as a return air duct. Reference: Section 601.2, IMC 2012.] |
| 03/22/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. GENERAL: REVISIONS WERE NOT MADE TO THIS SUBMITTAL SET PER THE COMMENTS OF THE FIRST REVIEW. PLEASE PROVIDE. |
| 03/24/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | IT WAS REQUESTED PER THE FIRST ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW, TO PROVIDE FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE TUCSON/PIMA COUNTY OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE FOR THE EXTERIOR LIGHTING. AT THIS SUBSEQUENT PLAN REVIEW, THERE WAS NO CHANGE OR CORRECTION FROM THE ORIGINAL PLAN OR RESPONSE. REF: 2012 IBC 107.2.1, TUCSON OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE. |