Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI
Permit Number - T16CM09484
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/03/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide tempered water for the restroom lavatories and public hand-washing sinks using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Sections 416.5 and 607.1.2, IPC 2012. 2. Provide an automatic faucet for the lavatory, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Verify that the automatic faucet will operate for a minimum time of 10-seconds. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson and Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-09. 3. Provide identification of the non-potable water piping to equipment downstream of backflow preventers (e.g. RPZ-1, RPZ-2, and RPZ-3). Reference: Section 608.8, IPC 2012. 4. The sanitary waste calculations table on sheet P0.01 incorrectly correlates drainage fixture units with demand. 5. Provide roof drainage calculations and plans. Provide overflow protection for the roof. Reference: Sections 1101, 1106 and 1108, IPC 2012. |
| 02/03/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Show how the normal ventilation of the machinery room will exhaust a minimum of 0.5 CFM per square foot to the outside in compliance with Section 1105.6.3.1, IMC 2012. 2. Show the size, route and the termination of the chiller pressure relief vents. Reference: Section 1105.7, IMC 2012. 3. The boilers are scheduled with a minimum manifold pressure of 5 PSI. If Southwest Gas supplies 5 PSI gas at the gas meter, how will you ensure that no pressure drop occurs in the gas distribution piping? 4. Show that the mechanical equipment (e.g. chillers, boilers, and cooling towers) meet the minimum efficiency requirements set forth in Tables C403.2.3. (5), C403.2.3(7), and C403.2.3(8), IECC 2012. Reference: Section C403.2.3, IMC 2012. |
| 02/03/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the size of the water meter and the size of the reduced pressure backflow prevention assembly serving this building. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 02/06/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: Banner CUP T16CM09484 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 6, 2017 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Until the plans are approved by all PDSD agencies Zoning cannot approve the building plans. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 02/09/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/09/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T16CM09484 (RELATES TO FOUNDATION ONLY PROJECT T16CM07352) NEW BANNER CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT PHASE II 1. SHEET G1.1.0; DOOR FIRE RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION SYMBOLS: THE DOOR FOR THE ONE HOUR FIRE BARRIER INDICATES A DOOR RATING OF ¾ OR 1 HOUR AND REFERENCES THE IBC TABLE 716.5. SINCE THERE ARE ONE HOUR FIRE BARRIER DOORS ON EACH LEVEL, PLEASE SPECIFICALLY INDICATE THE DOOR RATINGS AT THESE LOCATIONS. 2. SHEET G1.1.0; MINIMUM FIRE RESISTIVE REQUIREMENTS: PLEASE INDICATE THE FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS REQUIRED FOR THE VARIOUS INTERIOR WALLS, AND ADD A REFERENCE TO THE CODE SECTION THAT INDICATES THOSE FIRE RESISTANCE RATING REQUIREMENTS (OR INDICATE THE CODE SECTION ON SPECIFIC ASSEMBLIES ON SHEET A4.3.0). 3. SHEET A5.1.2; SECTION 1: IS THE SHIP'S LADDER PRE-MANUFACTURED, OR IS THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN? PLEASE PROVIDE NOTE ON THE SECTION AND COORDINATE WITH THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. 4. SHEET S0.1; STRUCTURAL NOTES (GENERAL #28): SEE NOTES 8 AND 9 IN THE REVIEW COMMENTS FOR REFERENCE OF THE LIVE LOADS TO THE IBC TABLES 1607.1 AND 1613. 5. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 5 (CODE): PLEASE INDICATE THE BUILDING CODE EDITION (2012). 6. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 5 (OCCUPANCY): THE DRAWINGS INDICATE OCCUPANCY TYPES S-1, S-2, AND B. THE OCCUPANCY GROUP LISTED IN THE CALCULATIONS IS B ONLY. PLEASE VERIFY AND COORDINATE. 7. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SHEET 5 (TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION): PLEASE LIST THE CONSTRUCTION TYPE (IIB INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS). 8. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; LIVE LOADS (FLOOR): PLEASE REFERENCE THE LIVE LOADS INDICATED IN THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS ON SHEET 4 TO THE SPECIFIC LOAD TYPE (OCCUPANCY OR USE) INDICATED IN THE IBC TABLE 1607.1. 9. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS; SEISMIC LOADS (SHEET 11): PLEASE VERIFY THE SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY A AS INDICATED IN THE CALCULATIONS FOR RISK CATEGORY IV MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1613. 10. GENERAL: PLEASE NOTE ON THE DRAWINGS THAT THE FOUNDATIONS WERE APPROVED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT (T16CM07352). 11. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 02/09/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved | |
| 02/14/2017 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/14/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. ALSO PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE. #1. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETE COMPLIANCE WITH THE TUCSON/PIMA COUNTY OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE. #2. PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2012 IECC FOR LIGHTING. #3. REF: PLAN E3.2.0 AND E7.0.1. The room numbers for the parallel gear do not correlate between plan sheets. #4. REF: PLAN E7.01. (a) Please clarify general note #6. Could not locate NEC Table 310.666. (b) Also justify the size and current carrying capacity per the NEC, for the conductors identified as MV500, feeding the three distribution switchboards, ( USS-CUP-1, 2, AND 3 ). They appear to be undersized for the OCPD's shown on the Paralleling switchgear as referenced per NEC 310.60 tables. Not sure which table was intended to be used. (c) The OCPD for panel CUPHP1 is not shown on the Distribution Switchboard USS-CUP-1. (d) Please include the OCPD sizes and ratings for the feeders terminated to generators #1,#2 #3 feeding the Parallel Gear. Verify that the size, types, and current carrying capacity of the feeder conductors is adequate. (e) Clarify what feeders #4 and #7 shown from the Parallel Gear going into the generator room are for. (f) Is there an interconnection of utility power as related to this equipment? If yes, please revise the one-line diagram with the necessary information in order to provide a complete one line diagram. (g) Provide for signage or warning labels as required per NEC art's 700 and 705.10 as applicable. #5. Provide compliance to meet requirements of NEC 110.26.3c for all egress doors to all the electrical rooms. Doors to swing in the direction of egress and equipped with panic hardware. #6. REF: PLAN E8.0.2, DETAIL #6. (Transformer Grounding). Grounding Electrode note……"See 3 E9.01 for requirements". Could not locate any information for transformer grounding on plan sheet E9.01. Please clarify. Ref: 2012 IBC sec. 107.2.1, 2011 NEC, 2012 IECC, TUCSON/PIMA COUNTY OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE. Dan Santa Cruz COMMERCIAL ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW, CITY OF TUCSON 520-837-4995 Dan.santacruz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/02/2017 | MMENDIB1 | WWM | REVIEW | Needs Review |