Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T16CM09287
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/01/2017 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/13/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. PREVIOUS COMMENT 6; SHEET A0.2; EXIT NOTES (F): PER SHEET A0.0 (PROJECT DATA), A FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM HAS NOW BEEN ADDED TO THIS PROJECT AS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CHANGE NOTE F TO ADD THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM, AND REVISE THE ALLOWABLE EXIT TRAVEL DISTANCE TO 250 FEET PER TABLE 1016.2. 2. PREVIOUS COMMENT 11; SHEET A0.2; EXIT DOORS: THE FIRST REQUIREMENT (FOR EGRESS WIDTH) INDICATES NO SPRINKLER SYSTEM, WHILE THE SECOND REQUIREMENT (FOR EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE) INDICATES A SPRINKLER SYSTEM. PLEASE COORDINATE. 3. PREVIOUS COMMENT 12; SHEET A0.2; EXIT DOORS: EXIT #4 AT THE NEW GATE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE LIFE SAFETY INFORMATION EXIT CALCULATIONS, BUT STILL INDICATES A 52 OCCUPANT CAPACITY ON THE EXIT PLAN. PLEASE COORDINATE. 4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 16; SHEET A1.1; WALL TYPES SCHEDULE: PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL REFERENCES FOR WALL TYPES M AND S (NEW WALLS), AND ADD NEW WALL DETAILS ON SHEET A3.0 AS REQUIRED. 5. PREVIOUS COMMENT 23; SHEET A1.5; TOILET LAYOUT 1: THE ELEVATION INDICATOR ON THE WOMEN'S SIDE AT THE ENTRANCE DOOR (4/A1.5) SHOULD BE NOTED AS SIMILAR. PLEASE REVISE. 6. PREVIOUS COMMENT 26; GENERAL: MANY OF THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS (SHEET A0.2 DIAGONAL DISTANCES, SHEET A1.0 FLOOR DRAIN PLAN AND DEMOLITION PLAN DIMENSIONS, SHEET A1.1 FLOOR PLAN DIMENSIONS, SHEET A1.2 CEILING PLAN DIMENSIONS, SHEET A1.3 COUNTER SEATING LAYOUT AND MOP BASIN DETAILS DIMENSIONS, SHEET A1.5 ELEVATION DIMENSIONS, SHEET A2.0 ELEVATION DIMENSIONS, SHEET A3.0 SECTION DIMENSIONS, SHEET A3.1 DETAIL DIMENSIONS, SHEET A4.0 PLAN NOTES, AND SHEET A4.1 PLAN NOTES) STILL HAVE LETTERING THAT DOES NOT MEET THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIREMENTS (MINIMUM 3/32" IN HEIGHT FOR UPPER AND LOWER CASE). PLEASE REVISE. 7. PREVIOUS COMMENT 27; GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 02/15/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The 4" horizontal sanitary waste drain running north through the kitchen (room 109) has no cleanout. [Initial comment: Provide cleanouts sized for the nominal size of pipes that they serve up to 4-inches. Reference: Section 708.7, IPC 2012.] |
| 02/15/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The location of the demand control panel and its sequence of action was not found. [Initial comment: A note on sheet M13 calls for a demand control ventilation panel. Provide the location of the panel and the sequence of operation for demand control ventilation. Reference: Section 507.1 exception (3), IMC 2012.] |
| 02/27/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/03/2017 | FRODRIG2 | WWM | REVIEW | Approved |