Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T16CM09287
Parcel: 12713078C

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T16CM09287
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/11/2017 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change T16CM09287
TI: BLACK BEAR DINER

1. SHEET A0.0; GOVERNING CODES: PLEASE REMOVE THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE, AND ADD THE 2009 ICC/ANSI A117.1 ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
2. SHEET A0.0; PROJECT DATA: HOW IS THE ACTUAL TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD DETERMINED? THE PLUMBING FIXTURES ARE BASED ON 291 TOTAL OCCUPANTS. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CALCULATION ON THE DRAWING THAT SHOWS THAT DETERMINATION.
3. SHEET A0.0; PROJECT DATA: THE 'PROVIDED FIXTURES' INDICATES TWO MEN'S WATER CLOSETS + ONE URINAL. PLEASE VERIFY. THE FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A1.1 INDICATES ONE WATER CLOSET AND ONE URINAL IN THE MEN'S ROOM.
4. SHEET A0.2; EXIT NOTES: NOTE C REFERENCES EXIT PASSAGEWAY REQUIREMENTS. PER THE IBC SECTION 202, THERE ARE NO EXIT PASSAGEWAYS IN THIS PROJECT (FIRE RATED, SEPARATED EXIT COMPONENT). PLEASE VERIFY.
5. SHEET A0.2; EXIT NOTES: NOTE D REFERENCES THE 2003 ICC/ANSI. PLEASE REVISE TO THE 2009 EDITION.
6. SHEET A0.2; EXIT NOTES: NOTE F REFERENCES TABLE 1016.1 FOR THE EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE TO TABLE 1016.2. REMOVE THE NOTE ON THE MAXIMUM EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE WITH A SPRINKLER SYSTEM.
7. SHEET A0.2; LIFE SAFETY INFORMATION: THE ACCESSIBLE SEATING REQUIREMENT CALCULATION (165 X 5% = 8.25 SEATS) SHOULD INDICATE 9 ACCESSIBLE SPACES. PLEASE REVISE ON THE PLAN.
8. SHEET A0.2; EXIT PLAN: THERE SHOULD BE 9 ACCESSIBLE SEATING SPACES SHOWN IN THE DINING AREA (SEE COMMENT 7). THE PLAN DOES NOT APPEAR TO INDICATE THAT MANY ACCESSIBLE SPACES. PLEASE VERIFY.
9. SHEET A0.2; LIFE SAFETY INFORMATION: THE EXIT ACCESS CALCULATIONS REFERENCE MINIMUM CORRIDOR WIDTHS. THIS PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE ANY ACTUAL CORRIDORS (WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE HALL 104 AT THE RESTROOMS). FOR THIS PROJECT, THE MEANS OF EGRESS WIDTH PER THE IBC SECTION 1005 WILL BE THE CONTROL. PLEASE REMOVE THE CORRIDOR WIDTH CRITERIA.
10. SHEET A0.2; LIFE SAFETY INFORMATION: A NOTE (LINE 6) REFERENCES THE IBC TABLE 1019.1 FOR THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF EXITS REQUIRED. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE.
11. SHEET A0.2; LIFE SAFETY INFORMATION (EXIT DOORS): A REFERENCE IS MADE TO TABLE 1016.1 FOR ALLOWABLE TRAVEL DISTANCE. PLEASE REVISE THE REFERENCE TO TABLE 1016.2. IF THE BUILDING IS NOT SPRINKLERED (PER SHEET A0.0), PLEASE REVISE THE EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE.
12. SHEET A0.2; EXIT PLAN: GATE 4 ON THE PLAN INDICATES AN ACTUAL EXIT LOAD OF 52. PLEASE REVISE THAT NUMBER PER THE LIFE SAFETY EXIT GATE #4 CALCULATION.
13. SHEET A0.2; EXIT PLAN: EXITS #1, 2, AND 3 INDICATE A COMBINED TOTAL (ACTUAL) OF 232 OCCUPANTS (137 + 84 + 11). THE TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD IS 291, WHICH IS 59 OCCUPANTS GREATER THAN THE TOTAL INDICATED AT THE THREE DOORS. PLEASE COORDINATE.
14. SHEET A0.2 (SEATING CALCULATIONS); SHEET A1.3 (SEATING CALCULATIONS): PLEASE COORDINATE THE SEATING CALCULATIONS.
15. SHEET A1.0; FLOOR DRAIN PLAN: THE PLAN HAS SEVERAL REFERENCES TO NOTE 27. WHERE IS THIS NOTE FOUND?
16. SHEET A1.1; WALL TYPES SCHEDULE: PLEASE PROVIDE THE DETAIL REFERENCES ON THE WALL TYPES AS REQUIRED. DETAIL TYPICALLY INDICATES XX/XX.
17. SHEET A1.1; FLOOR PLAN: A SECTION CUT REFERENCES 2/A2.1 AT THE COUNTER SERVICE AREA 107. PLEASE REVISE THE SECTION REFERENCE.
18. SHEET A1.1; PLAN NOTES: PLEASE PROVIDE THE DETAIL REFERENCES IN NOTES 08, 09, 10, AND 12.
19. SHEET A1.1; PLAN NOTES: NOTE 13 REFERENCES DETAIL 1D/A3.1. PLEASE VERIFY THE REFERENCE IS CORRECT.
20. SHEET A1.2; PLAN NOTES: PLEASE PROVIDE THE DETAIL REFERENCES IN NOTES 03, 07, 08, 09, AND 11.
21. SHEET A1.3; PLAN NOTES: PLEASE PROVIDE THE DETAIL REFERENCE IN NOTE 09.
22. SHEET A1.4; FINISH PLAN: THE INTERIOR ELEVATION INDICATORS ARE NOT CORRECT. PLEASE REVISE.
23. SHEET A1.5; TOILET LAYOUT 1: THE ELEVATION INDICATOR ON THE WOMEN'S SIDE AT THE ENTRANCE DOOR SHOULD BE 4/A1.5 SIMILAR. PLEASE REVISE.
24. SHEET A2.0; ELEVATIONS: PLEASE ADD THE ELEVATION INDICATORS FOR THIS SHEET ON A PLAN.
25. SHEET S2.1; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: KEYNOTE 5 LOCATED AT THE 760 LB. MECHANICAL UNIT (NORTHWEST LOCATION) IS NOT CORRECT. PLEASE REVISE.
26. GENERAL: THE CITY OF TUCSON REQUIRES ALL LETTERING (UPPER AND LOWER CASE) TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3/32" IN HEIGHT. MOST OF THE SHEETS HAVE DIMENSIONS, NOTES, SCHEDULES, ETC. THAT DO NOT MEET THE HEIGHT REQUIREMENT. PLEASE REVISE.
27. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
01/12/2017 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
01/12/2017 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Use the exterior design conditions shown in Section 302.2, IECC 2012, as modified by the City of Tucson. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012.
2. The manufacturer of the three Type I hoods states that high velocity HVAC diffusers are not to be installed within 10-feet of the exhaust hoods (see M6). Show that the equipment is being installed in accordance with the conditions of its listing and the manufacturer's installation requirements. Reference: Section 304.1, IMC 2012.
3. Provide information on the sequence of operation for the restroom exhaust fan, EF-1, to show that all of the air supplied to the restrooms will be exhausted during the operating hours of the building. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (4), IMC 2012.
4. Coordinate the kitchen balancing summary on sheet M5 with the balancing information for the kitchen exhaust fans. Reference: Section 501.4 and 508.1, IMC 2012.
5. A note on sheet M13 calls for a demand control ventilation panel. Provide the location of the panel and the sequence of operation for demand control ventilation. Reference: Section 507.1 exception (3), IMC 2012.
6. Verify that the specified make-up air unit, MAU-1, complies with Section 928.2, IMC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
01/13/2017 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Verify the minimum available water pressure for this address with Tucson Water; the data from Tucson Water appears to show a pressure range of 50 to 57 PSI. Revise the water pressure calculations as required. (Note that Tucson Water limits the capacity of a 1-1/2" water meter to 75 GPM.) Reference: Section 604.6, IPC 2012.
2. The specified backflow prevention device, Watts model 9BD, is not listed for ASSE 1022 as required for coffee machines or other non-carbonated beverage dispensers. Reference: Section 608.16.10, IPC 2012.
3. Provide cleanouts sized for the nominal size of pipes that they serve up to 4-inches. Reference: Section 708.7, IPC 2012.
4. Provide separate indirect waste pipes for each compartment of the 3-compartment sink and the prep sink to protect against cross-contamination or fouling. Reference: Sections 801.2 and 802.1.8, IPC 2012.
5. The minimum size for a vent is one-half of the size of the drain pipe it serves (e.g. the minimum size of a vent for a 4" drain is 2"). Reference; Section 906.1, IPC 2012.
6. Hand sinks in the kitchen are allowed to connect to the sanitary waste system instead of the grease waste system only if each sink has a sign posted above it stating, "HANDWASH SINK ONLY! NO FOOD PREPARATION OR DISHWASHING ALLOWED." Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
7. Verify that the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (Steven.Valencia@pima.gov, 520-724-6209) will allow the kitchen floor sinks, floor drains, and floor troughs to bypass the grease interceptor. Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
8. Revise the sizing calculations for the gravity grease interceptor using the method shown in Section 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
9. Revise the configuration of the natural gas sediment trap, as shown in detail 1/P5 to comply with the requirements of Section 408.4, IFGC 2012 (i.e. see detail 3/P5).
01/18/2017 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. ALSO PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE.
#1. Ref: Plan Sheet E4. Identify all exterior luminaires with a letter or symbol and assign a circuit and panel designation.
#2. Ref: Plan Sheet, E2, E4. The quantity of type 'F' luminaires shown on the exterior lighting comcheck, does not correlate with plan sheet E4.
#3. Ref: Plan Sheet E2, E4. The outdoor lighting calcs show 31 type 'F' luminaires. This does not correlate with plan sheet E4.
#4. Ref: Plan Sheets E3, E6. Are the panelboards A,B,C, and D new or existing?
#5. Provide for all 125 volt single phase receptacles installed in commercial kitchens to be ground fault protected per 2011 NEC art. 210.8 B2.
Ref: 2012 IBC 107.2.1, 2011 NEC, TUCSON/PIMA COUNTY OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE.
Dan.santacruz@tucsonaz.gov
12/21/2016 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change Based on the proposed use and the increased occupant load from the previous Certificate of Occupancy, TFD is requiring the building to have a complete automatic fire sprinkler system. An appeal can be made to the Fire Code Official and the Building Code Official for this requirement.-Ken Brouillette