Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: T16CM09071
Parcel: 12212043B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: COMMERCIAL - TI

Permit Number - T16CM09071
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - TI
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/03/2017 ERIC NEWCOMB BUILDING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. SHEET T1; APPLICABLE CODES: PLEASE REVISE THE INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE TO THE 2012 EDITION.
2. SHEET T1; DEVELOPMENT DATA: A NOTE INDICATES 'OCCUPANCY SEPARATION NOT REQUIRED PER 302.3.1'. PLEASE REVISE THE IBC SECTION REFERENCE.
3. SHEET T1; DEVELOPMENT DATA: PLEASE INDICATE ON THIS SHEET THE OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THIS BUILDING. WAS THE OCCUPANT LOAD INCREASED FROM THE ORIGINAL BUILDING DUE TO THE EXPANDED AREA UNDER THE EXISTING CANOPY? THAT SPACE WOULD TYPICALLY NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE OCCUPANT LOAD.
4. SHEET T1; DEVELOPMENT DATA: PLEASE INDICATE ON THIS SHEET THE REQUIRED PLUMBING FIXTURES IF THE NEW OCCUPANT LOAD IS A CHANGE TO THE ORIGINAL.
5. SHEET A1; DETAILS 1 AND 2: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DETAILS THE METAL STUD BRACE SIZE AND THE NUMBER AND SIZE OF CONNECTORS.
6. SHEET A1 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A4.1 (SECTION 3): PLEASE INDICATE WHERE SECTION 3/A4.1 IS CUT/REFERENCED ON THE PLAN.
7. SHEET A1; LEGEND: PLEASE ADD A REFERENCE IN THE LEGEND TO REFERENCE SHEET SP2 FOR DOOR HARDWARE.
8. SHEET A7; CEILING PLAN: ALL DETAIL CUTS ON THE PLAN SHOULD REFERENCE SHEET A7. PLEASE REVISE.
9. SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN); SHEET A1 (FLOOR PLAN): AT THE SOUTH WALL OF OFFICE 2, AN AREA INFILL IS INDICATED AT THE EXISTING OPENING. ON SHEET S2.0, THERE IS A DETAIL 106 IN THE SAME AREA THAT INDICATES AN EXISTING MASONRY WALL. PLEASE COORDINATE.
10. SHEET S2.1 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); SHEET S4.0 (DETAIL 202): THE PLAN AND BEAM SCHEDULE INDICATE B1 IS A 6X10 WOOD BEAM, WHILE DETAIL 202 INDICATES A 4X10 (NOTE 10). PLEASE COORDINATE.
11. SHEET S2.1 (ROOF FRAMING PLAN); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (B2 DESIGN): THE PLAN AND BEAM SCHEDULE INDICATE B2 IS A 5 1/8" X 13 1/2" GLB. THE STRUCTURAL CALCULATION IS CONFUSING (13.50 X 10.25 BEAM)? PLEASE CLARIFY.
12. SHEET S2.1: PLEASE REVISE THE SHEET TITLE.
13. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 106: PLEASE CLARIFY THE DETAIL NOTES.
14. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 104: PLEASE INDICATE NOTE 5 ON THE DETAIL.
15. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 105: PLEASE INDICATE THE EMBEDMENT OF THE DOWELS (NOTES 3 AND 5).
16. SHEET S3.0; DETAIL 108: PLEASE CLARIFY THE DETAIL NOTES.
17. SHEET S4.0; DETAIL 202: PLEASE INDICATE NOTE 13 ON THE DETAIL.
18. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 204: PLEASE INDICATE NOTE 4 ON THE DETAIL.
19. SHEET S4.1; DETAIL 206: PLEASE REVERSE NOTES 6 AND 7 ON THE DETAIL.
20. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS.
01/05/2017 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
01/25/2017 GERRY KOZIOL WWM REVIEW Approved
12/13/2016 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved
12/28/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Provide structural calculations and details for attaching the water heater mounting shelf to the building structure (neither the architect nor the structural engineer provided this information). Reference: Section 301.2, IPC 2012.
2. Verify that the specified sensor faucet for the public lavatories will be set to dispense a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. Reference: Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
3. The roof drains being modified do not appear to have independent overflow drain leaders. If so, provide independent overflow drain leaders for those drain leaders that are being modified. Reference: Section 1108.2, IPC 2012.
12/28/2016 ROBERT SHERRY WATER REVIEW Completed
12/28/2016 ROBERT SHERRY MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Show the size, routing, and termination of the condensate drain for AC-1. Reference: Section 307.2.1, IMC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Recheck the ventilation calculation for RTU-2. Based on your calculations, Vou/Ev = Vot should be 497 CFM, not 329 CFM. Reference, Section 403.3.2.3.4, IMC 2012.
3. Revise the roof assembly description of the Envelope Compliance Certificate to correspond to the roof assembly actually used: all of the insulation located above the roof (i.e. a continuously insulated roof). Reference: section C101.4.3, IECC 2012.
4. Provide the documentation noted on the Envelope Compliance Certificate (footnote a) for the 'other' components used. Note that new exterior wall sections and fenestration are required to comply with the current energy code. Reference: Section C101.4.3, IECC 2012.
5. Provide storefront and vertical fenestration with NFRC-certified U-factor and SHGC values that comply with the requirements of Sections C303.1.3, C402.3, C402.3.3, and C402.3.3.1, IECC 2012.