Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Permit Number - T16CM08564
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - TI ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/23/2017 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/30/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 01/30/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Comment not addressed by the architect. Provide the civil sheets as part of this drawing set. (see sheet index on G001). [Initial comment: Provide the site utilities plan noted on sheets P101, P102, P103, P107, P108, and P109. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] 2. Comment not addressed by the architect. [Initial comment: If the shower (P-10) does not have a pre-fabricated receptor, provide details to show that the construction of the receptor complies with the requirements of Section 417.5.2, IPC 2012.] 3. Comment not resolved by the architect. Using an undersized primary scupper ensures that the secondary scupper will have water flow even if the primary scupper is not blocked leading to incorrect assessments of "normal" operation. In addition, the roof deflection must be considered when evaluating the maximum rain load for the roof. [Initial comment: The scupper sizes appear to have been determined using a head of 4". With an overflow scupper that has a low point 2" above the low point of the roof (Detail 16/A133), a 4" head would result in a water depth of 6" for a rain load of 31 PSF. Have the structural engineer verify that the roof is capable of supporting this load. Reference: Section 1101.7, IPC 2012 and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012.] |
| 02/06/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Clarify why the scheduled total cooling capacities (some of which are the nominal capacities) are much greater than the calculated total cooling loads. [Initial comment: Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012.] 2. The basis for the SHGF and U-factors used in the envelope compliance calculations of COMcheck are based on the use of double-glazed windows with metal frames having a thermal break. Show these requirements on the window schedule. [Initial comment: Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factors for the opaque doors and the U-factors and SHGC values for glazed and on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3 (3), IECC 2012. Reference: Sections C202 (Fenestration) and C303.1.3, IECC 2012.] 3. The energy efficiency ratios (EER) for units RTU-1 through RTU-6 are not in compliance with the requirements of Section C406.2, IECC 2012. [Initial comment: Provide the mechanical energy code compliance certification (COMcheck) for all of the proposed HVAC systems. The envelope compliance certifications for all of the buildings indicate that Efficient HVAC Performance, C406.2, IECC 2012 has been selected to be the required additional energy efficiency option. Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012.] 4. Rooms 5016 and 5018 appear to be used for holding animals after their surgeries. Provide 0.9 CFM of exhaust per square foot. [Initial comment: Ventilation for animal areas requires mechanical exhaust of at least 0.9 CFM per square foot with no recirculation of air. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (3) and Table 403.3, IMC 2012.] |
| 02/06/2017 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/15/2017 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/21/2017 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Reqs Change | For Sewer Connection Fee Application Approval: Needs Manhole Construction Permit for a new manhole. Sylvia Quinlan (520-724-6649). An approved COT private sewer permit along with a PDEQ Construction Approval (CA) will be needed to connect the private sewer to the new public sewer manhole. Thank you, Gerry |