Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Permit Number - T16CM08564
Review Name: COMMERCIAL - NEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/16/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/22/2016 | GERRY KOZIOL | WWM | REVIEW | Reqs Change | For Sewer Connection Fee Application approval: A new request for Sewer Capacity will need to be submitted to: RWRDCapacityResponse@pima.gov *The previous Type III Capacity Allocation #P16WC00046 dated 2/25/16 has expired Questions: Kurt Stemm 520-724-6607 – kurt.stemm@pima.gov) The construction of a new public sewer manhole requires a “PCRWRD Small Activity Construction Permit” from Sylvia Quinlan (520-724-6649)Sylvia.Quinlan@pima.gov An approved COT private sewer permit along with a PDEQ Construction Approval (CA) will be needed to connect the private sewer to the new public sewer manhole Thank you, Gerry FYI: PSL #P16WS00074 was approved 8/24/16 and this project will connect to a new 2” water meter per DP sheet 7/20 |
| 11/28/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/05/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide the site utilities plan noted on sheets P101, P102, P103, P107, P108, and P109. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Section 416.6, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson, requires the installation of an automatic faucet for the lavatories, dispensing a maximum of 0.25 gallons per metering cycle. The specified faucet for P-1A calls for a flow rate of 0.25 GPM but does not specify the cycle time for the faucet. Verify that the automatic faucet will operate for a maximum of 60-seconds and a minimum time of 10-seconds. Reference: Section 606.4, ICC/ANSI A117.1-09. 3. The plumbing fixture schedule does not specify which thermostatic mixing valve is to be used with the restroom lavatories. Provide tempered water for the lavatories and public hand-washing sinks in restrooms using approved devices conforming to ASSE 1070. Reference: Section 607.1.2, IPC 2012. 4. Coordinate the description for the sink, P-22, in the two plumbing fixture schedules on sheets P-901 and P-903. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 5. If the shower (P-10) does not have a pre-fabricated receptor, provide details to show that the construction of the receptor complies with the requirements of Section 417.5.2, IPC 2012. 6. Provide the dimensions and slopes for the gutters serving the sloped roofs. Verify that each gutter has an adequately-sized downspout. Include any contributing roof areas (e.g. the scuppers on the kennel buildings that discharge onto a sloped roof). Reference: Sections 1106.1 and 1106.6, IPC 2012. 7. The minimum dimension for a scupper is 4". Reference: Section 1108.3, IPC 2012. 8. The scupper sizes appear to have been determined using a head of 4". With an overflow scupper that has a low point 2" above the low point of the roof (Detail 16/A133), a 4" head would result in a water depth of 6" for a rain load of 31 PSF. Have the structural engineer verify that the roof is capable of supporting this load. Reference: Section 1101.7, IPC 2012 and Sections 1611.1 and 1611.3, IBC 2012. 9. Verify the size of the gas pipe serving RTU A-4 (Gas Meter #1); based on Table 402.4 (2), IFGC 2012, a load of 120 CFH with a developed length of 90-feet requires a 1" pipe. Reference: Sections 402.1 and 402.3, IFGC 2012. 10. The medical clinic building has a surgical suite as well as prep and recovery areas. Will any medical gas or vacuum systems be installed? |
| 12/05/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | WATER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Clarify how a water demand of 110 GPM was determined. It appears that you did not include the demand contribution of the many hose bibbs or hose reels. If the total water demand is in excess of 120 GPM, a 2" water meter may be too small for your use. |
| 12/06/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: 635 W. Roger Road T16CM08564 Building Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 6, 2016 1. The building plans have been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Until development package DP16-0150 has been approved Zoning cannot approve the building plan. 3. Until the above comments have been addressed and all other PDSD review agencies have approved the building plans zoning cannot approve. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 12/07/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | MECHANICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide heating and cooling load calculations that justify the capacities of the heating and cooling equipment specified for the project. Reference: Sections C403.2.1 and C403.2.2, IECC 2012, and Section 312.1, IMC 2012. 2. Clarify which envelope compliance certificate applies to which building; the building titles on the drawings do not match the titles on the COMcheck documents. Reference: Section C103.2, IECC 2012. 3. The exterior walls labeled X1 appear to be shown on the envelope compliance certificates as having a continuous insulation layer equivalent to R-5.7. This would be incorrect as the insulation inside the block cores is already included in the basic wall description. Adding a continuous insulation value would be appropriate if an EIFS treatment was applied to the wall. Note: wall sections that have more than one type of construction (e.g. type X3, masonry wainscoting with a metal stud wall above the masonry) should be entered as individual wall types of the appropriate areas. Reference: Section C402.2.3, IECC 2012. 4. Provide NFRC fenestration product ratings for the U-factors for the opaque doors and the U-factors and SHGC values for glazed and on COMcheck or use the appropriate default U-factor and SHGC values from Tables C303.1.3 (1), C303.1.3 (2) and C303.1.3 (3), IECC 2012. Reference: Sections C202 (Fenestration) and C303.1.3, IECC 2012. 5. Provide the mechanical energy code compliance certification (COMcheck) for all of the proposed HVAC systems. The envelope compliance certifications for all of the buildings indicate that Efficient HVAC Performance, C406.2, IECC 2012 has been selected to be the required additional energy efficiency option. Reference: Section C303.1, International Energy Conservation Code 2012. 6. Show how adequate access is being provided for the equipment located on the roof. Reference: Section 306.5, IMC 2012. 7. Provide an auxiliary or secondary condensate drain system for all of the fan coil units for which overflow of the condensate can cause damage to the building components. Reference: Section 307.2.3, IMC 2012. 8. Ventilation for animal areas requires mechanical exhaust of at least 0.9 CFM per square foot with no recirculation of air. Reference: Section 403.2.1 (3) and Table 403.3, IMC 2012. 9. Provide an air balancing report prior to the final mechanical inspection to verify that the HVAC systems are capable of supplying and exhausting at least the minimum air flow rates called for in the design drawings. The balancing shall be performed by a qualified balancing contractor in accordance with the procedural standards of either the National Environmental Balancing Bureau (NEBB) or the Associated Air Balance Council (AABC). Reference: Section 403.7, IMC 2012. |
| 12/12/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | BUILDING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. SHEET G100; CODE ANALYSIS PLAN: THE PLAN TITLE SHOULD INDICATE BUILDINGS 1 AND 2. PLEASE REVISE. 2. SHEET G100; CODE ANALYSIS PLAN: THE FIRE SEPARATION LINE AT THE SOUTH END OF BUILDING 1 INDICATES 'FIRE SEPARATION LINE BETWEEN BUILDING 1 AND BUILDING 3'. THE CODE ANALYSIS REFERENCE PLAN ON THIS SHEET INDICATES THE BUILDING SOUTH OF THE KENNELS (BUILDING 1) IS BUILDING 2. PLEASE CLARIFY. 3. SHEET G100; FIRE RESISTANCE RATING TABLE: THE TABLE INDICATES A TWO HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATING CMU BLOCK EXTERIOR WALL IS USED AT THE SOUTH END OF BUILDING 1. IS THERE A REASON FOR THE TWO HOUR RATING, OR IS THIS A MAINTENANCE ISSUE? PLEASE VERIFY. 4. SHEET G100; GENERAL BUILDING SUMMARY: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS HOW THE TOTAL BUILDING AREAS FOR BUILDINGS 1, 2, AND 3 WERE DETERMINED. BE SURE TO INCLUDE THE KENNEL AREAS IN THE AREA TOTALS. 5. SHEET G100; CODE ANALYSIS PLAN: THE OCCUPANT LOADS INDICATED ON THE PLAN FOR BUILDINGS 1 AND 2 (186 AND 86) DO NOT MATCH THE OCCUPANT LOADS LISTED ON THIS SHEET UNDER CHAPTER 10 (261 AND 82). PLEASE CLARIFY. 6. SHEET G100; BUILDING 2 COMPLIANCE TABLE: THE GENERAL BUILDING SUMMARY TABLE INDICATES BUILDING 2 HAS AN ACTUAL SF OF 14,881. THE BUILDING 2 COMPLIANCE TABLE INDICATES 14,949 SF. PLEASE CLARIFY. 7. SHEET G100 (EXTERIOR WALL FIRE RESISTANCE RATING); SHEET G101 (TWO HOUR CMU WALL): SHEET G100 INDICATES THE U.L. LISTING NUMBER IS U906, WHILE SHEET G101 INDICATES U905. PLEASE CLARIFY. 8. SHEET G100 (GENERAL BUILDING SUMMARY); SHEET G101 (CODE ANALYSIS PLAN): THE GENERAL BUILDING SUMMARY INDICATES BUILDING 3 HAS 2173 SF, WHILE THE CODE ANALYSIS PLAN INDICATES 1420 SF. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS HOW THE TOTAL BUILDING AREA WAS DETERMINED. 9. SHEET G101; CODE ANALYSIS PLAN: THE PLAN TITLE SHOULD INDICATE BUILDING 3. PLEASE REVISE. 10. SHEET G101; COMPLIANCE TABLE: THE HEADING FOR THIS TABLE INDICATES BUILDING 4. PLEASE REVISE. 11. SHEET G101; PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT: THE PLUMBING FIXTURE CALCULATIONS FOR OCCUPANCY B INDICATES BUILDINGS 1 THROUGH 4. WHERE IS BUILDING 4? 12. SHEET G101; PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT: PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD OF BUILDINGS 1, 2, AND 3. THE PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT INDICATES 357 TOTAL OCCUPANTS (156 + 201). 13. SHEET G101; PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT (B OCCUPANCY): THE WATER CLOSET AND LAVATORY COUNT SHOULD BE CALCULATED USING 100 MALES AND 101 FEMALES. MEN AND WOMEN WOULD REQUIRE 3 EACH, WHILE 7 WERE PROVIDED (+ FAMILY). THE LAVATORY COUNT WOULD BE 3 EACH, WHILE 7 WERE PROVIDED (+ FAMILY). PLEASE REVISE ON THE DRAWINGS. 14. SHEET S1.0 (GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES); GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: THE GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES INDICATE A DESIGN SOIL BEARING VALUE OF 1500 PSF, WHILE THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT INDICATES AN ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE OF 2500 PSF (PAGE 9). PLEASE CLARIFY. 15. SHEET S2.0; FOUNDATION PLAN: THE MOMENT FRAME FOOTING ON GRID 1.U NEEDS TO BE COMPLETED. 16. SHEETS S2.3 AND S2.4 (ROOF FRAMING PLANS); STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: NO CALCULATIONS WERE LOCATED FOR THE SHORT BEAMS (B10) TYPICALLY LOCATED AT THE MECHANICAL UNIT SUPPORTS. PLEASE VERIFY. 17. SHEET S2.3; ROOF FRAMING PLAN: AT THE ROOF AREA BETWEEN GRIDS 1.H AND 1.L AND GRIDS 1.5 (APPROXIMATELY) AND 1.8 (APPROXIMATELY), THE ROOF DECK AT THE NORTH AREA HAS KEYNOTES 1 (26 GA. STANDING SEAM DECK) AND 3 (22 GA. DECK) INDICATED ON THE SAME DECK. PLEASE CLARIFY. 18. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 201); ROOF FRAMING PLANS (S2.3 AND S2.5): THE X-BRACING DESIGN IN THE CALCULATIONS INDICATES A 5/8" DIAMETER ROD, WHICH MATCHES THE BRACING INDICATED ON SHEET S2.5 (KEYNOTE 2), BUT DOES NOT MATCH SHEET S2.3 (3" STRAP PER KEYNOTE 2). PLEASE CLARIFY. 19. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (PAGE 210); SHEET S2.0 (FOUNDATION PLAN): THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE THE MOMENT FRAME COLUMN AT MF1 IS A W10X49, WHILE THE PLAN INDICATES A W10X45 (C1). PLEASE CLARIFY. 20. SHEET A101; PARTITION SCHEDULE: THIS SCHEDULE REFERENCES SHEET A900 FOR DETAILS. PLEASE REVISE THE SHEET REFERENCE. 21. SHEET A101; FLOOR PLAN: IS THE POINT OF USE WATER DISPENSER (KEY NOTE 22.12) LOCATED FOR PUBLIC USE? IT APPEARS TO BE HIDDEN IN THE WORK ROOM 1305. IS THIS ACCESSIBLE FOR MANEUVERING CLEARANCES? PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLAN. 22. SHEETS A101, A150, AND G200; PLANS: IN THE CAT HABITAT AREA, A GRID NUMBER 1.14.5 SHOWS UP ON THE PLAN. PLEASE MOVE THAT GRID NOTIFICATION. 23. SHEETS A101, A102, AND A103; EXTERIOR WALL SCHEDULE: THE XR1 WALL MARK INDICATES A U905 U.L. LISTING IN THE DESCRIPTION, BUT A U906 IN THE U.L. NUMBER. PLEASE COORDINATE. 24. SHEET A102 (FLOOR PLAN); SHEET A301 (SECTION 12): SECTION 12 INDICATES A WALL BETWEEN GRIDS 1.17 AND 1.18, WHILE THE PLAN SHOWS NO WALL. PLEASE CLARIFY. 25. SHEET A133; DETAIL 21: PLEASE VERIFY THE HEIGHT OF THE GUARDRAIL ABOVE THE ROOF SURFACE MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE IBC SECTION 1013.3. 26. SHEET A405; RESTROOM/SHOWER FLOOR PLAN 3: PER THE ICC/ANSI SECTION 608.2, ACCESSIBLE SHOWER COMPARTMENTS SHALL HAVE SEATS COMPLYING WITH THIS SECTION. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEAT AND DETAIL FOR THIS SHOWER ON THE DRAWINGS. 27. SHEET A405; RESTROOM/SHOWER FLOOR PLAN 3: PLEASE PROVIDE ON THE DRAWINGS DETAILS FOR THE ACCESSIBLE SHOWER GRAB BAR LENGTHS AND LOCATIONS AND THE SHOWER CONTROL AND HANDSHOWER LOCATIONS PER THE ICC/ANSI SECTION 608. 28. SHEET A405; CASEWORK SCHEDULE: THE SCHEDULE OVERLAPS THE KEY NOTES. PLEASE CLEAR UP. 29. SHEET A701; DETAIL 14: PROVIDE A CONNECTION OF THE STUD WALL TO THE MASONRY WALL ON THIS DETAIL, OR PROVIDE A REFERENCE TO ANOTHER DETAIL. 30. GENERAL: MANY ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS DISPLAY THE EXTERIOR WALL SCHEDULE AND THE DESCREPANCY IN COORDINATING THE U.L. NUMBER FOR WALL XR1. PLEASE REVISE. 31. GENERAL: PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO ALL REVIEW COMMENTS. |
| 12/16/2016 | DAN SANTA CRUZ | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | T16CM08564 HUMANE SOCIETY Please address the following electrical plan review comments. Also provide a written response. #1. Ref: plan sheets E4.0, E5.0, E5.1, E5.2, E5.3. (a) The voltage and or amperage ratings for Panels AH2, ALD2, BH2, MH1, do not correlate between the one- line diagram and the Panel Schedule information. Should panel MLD be MLD1 on the one line? (b) E4.0: The one line diagram shows all the panels with MCB's, but does not reflect this on the panel schedules. (c) E4.0: The feeders for Panels MCH1, MH1, are both shown originating from Transformer BT1 instead of MSB. (d) E4.0: Please provide more detail for the grounding of the transformers. Is the COLD WATER PIPING per the one-line keynote 403 intended to function as a grounding electrode as required per NEC art 250.30A(4) and 250.52A(1) or just for the water pipe bonding as required per NEC art 250.104D1. Please include BUILDING STEEL per art 250..104D1, if applicable. (e) Provide for signage for the equipment tied in to the emergency systems NEC art's 700.7, 700.10. (f) Why is the oneline keynote # 402 and #404 both shown for the 200 amp circuit breaker at the bottom of MSB? REF: 2012 IBC 107.2.1, 2011 NEC Dan.santacruz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/16/2016 | ERIC NEWCOMB | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE | COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEE PROCESSING | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/09/2017 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |